| Revision as of 09:10, 3 May 2020 editSerial Number 54129 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,432 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2019 Sydney stabbing attack. (Mechanized Unit)← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:55, 22 January 2021 edit undoDreamy Jazz Bot (talk | contribs)Bots106,824 edits Adding Template:Bots and excluding this page from mass messages as this user is vanished. (Task 5 - BRFA - report errors here) |
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== May 2020 == |
|
== May 2020 == |
|
|
<div class="notice" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has ''also'' been revoked.</div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then submit a request to the '']''. ] 02:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> |
|
|
|
|
|
:I think that what happened is unfortunate. I didn't read the history of this talk page which apparently was also related to the block, but have noticed the stabbing article. I also noticed your message on Serial's page about leaving Misplaced Pages. You appear to be able to write articles. I understand that it can be frustrating for an article we wrote to be nominated for deletion. Misplaced Pages indeed has policies like ] and ], the bar for inclusion is higher than it used to be long ago too. Other policies have to do with collaboration, these include discussing content and using standard processes patiently rather than considering editing like a conflict against other editors. Your block is short and I hope that you will consider collaborating again but with an approach that is compatible with Misplaced Pages. The other editors are likely to be helpful if you are careful with the approach. Deletion of an article is also not rejection of the person who wrote it... It's of course your choice to stop editing, but this block is short and opportunities remain open. —]] – 13:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. |
|
|
|
{{bots|deny=all|optout=MassMessage}} |
|
|
|
|
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]]] 09:10, 3 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
