Talk:Ruined orgasm: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:04, 21 December 2006 editFT2 (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 edits merged← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 14:46, 1 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk \| contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,733 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Old AfD multi\| date = 6 March 2009 (UTC) \| result = '''merge to ]''' \| page = Ruined orgasm }}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Stub\|
			{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality\|importance=low}}
			}}



	"Some information in this article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable."		"Some information in this article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable."

Line 5:		Line 12:
	This is part of a highly private subculture. theres not likely to be written sources. The only sources are to read sexually oriented forums like		This is part of a highly private subculture. theres not likely to be written sources. The only sources are to read sexually oriented forums like

	http://www.lockmeup.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi {{unsigned\|Lincspoacher }}		http://www.lockmeup.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

	:]. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Misplaced Pages. ] 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)		:]. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Misplaced Pages. ] 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Line 12:		Line 19:

	Merged into ] -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] \| ])</span></sup> 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)		Merged into ] -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] \| ])</span></sup> 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
			:I have not previously been monitoring this article, so I didn't know about the merge. Had I known, I would have objected, because ruined orgasm is not the same as erotic sexual denial. I've now restored the article and shall try to improve it. Of course, if anyone still wishes to make it a re-direct, I shall be happy to debate it.--] 21:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:46, 1 February 2024

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Erotic sexual denial.

This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Some information in this article or section has not been verified and may not be reliable."

pfffft

This is part of a highly private subculture. theres not likely to be written sources. The only sources are to read sexually oriented forums like

http://www.lockmeup.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lincspoacher (talk • contribs)

The threshold for inclusion in Misplaced Pages is verifiability, not truth. If it can't be verified, it shouldn't be on Misplaced Pages. Mdwh 23:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Merged

Merged into Erotic sexual denial -- covers very similar territory and repeats similar material. FT2 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I have not previously been monitoring this article, so I didn't know about the merge. Had I known, I would have objected, because ruined orgasm is not the same as erotic sexual denial. I've now restored the article and shall try to improve it. Of course, if anyone still wishes to make it a re-direct, I shall be happy to debate it.--Taxwoman 21:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Categories: