| Revision as of 02:57, 24 May 2020 editDocumentError (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,388 edits Notification: Your Articles for creation submission has been accepted (AFCH 0.9.1)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:47, 3 November 2024 edit undoCan I Log In (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,880 editsmNo edit summaryTag: Manual revert | ||
| (184 intermediate revisions by 36 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| | archive = User talk:Can I Log In/Archive %(counter)d | | archive = User talk:Can I Log In/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| | counter = 1 | | counter = 1 | ||
| | maxarchivesize = |
| maxarchivesize = 1969K | ||
| | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | | archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}} | ||
| | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Notification preferences|ping|Can I Log In}} | {{Notification preferences|ping|Can I Log In}} | ||
| {{If IP|{{Usertalkback|icon=stop|iconsize1=100px|you=notifications}}|{{Usertalkback|icon=info|iconsize1=100px|you=notifications|me=notifications}}}} | |||
| <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="font-size:200%;">'''''Registered''''' users</span></div> | |||
| {{Usertalkback|icon=info|iconsize1=100px|you=notifications|me=notifications}} | |||
| <div class="center" style="width: auto; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><span style="font-size:200%;">'''''IP''''' users</span></div> | |||
| {{Usertalkback|icon=stop|iconsize1=100px|you=notifications}} | |||
| {{Collapse top|A belated welcome!}} | {{Collapse top|A belated welcome!}} | ||
| {{User talk:Can I Log In/A belated welcome!}} | {{User talk:Can I Log In/A belated welcome!}} | ||
| {{collapse bottom}} | {{collapse bottom}} | ||
| == Quick note re: NYL == | |||
| == Kumbharia Jain Temples == | |||
| Hi Can I Log In! Thanks again for your feedback at ] and adding the request edit template to the follow-up I'd posted. Do you think you might be able to look again? It seems like the edit request queue is a little more backlogged than usual, and since you're familiar with the ask I wanted to see if it might be at all possible for you to take a look at my reply. Thank you in advance! ] (] · ]) 21:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| Hi ] Thanks a lot for your help in improving the quality of the article ]. - ] <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 18:45, September 9, 2020</small> | |||
| == Notice == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 00:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Note that I have closed the thread with a ]. ] (]) 15:06, 24 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Just to add onto this formal warning, if you circumvent an automated-editing rule such as this again in order to automate your edits without approval, you ''will'' be blocked indefinitely as an ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 09:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == April 2020 == | |||
| Please don't mess with RfD or other deletion templates, as you did . These templates are working as intended. If you would like to express an opinion about whether the redirect should be kept or not, you can participate in the discussion that the template links to. <sub>signed, </sub>] <sup>]</sup> 17:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == RfC close == | |||
| Just a note that I've reverted your RfC close , as you don't appear to be taking it seriously, and you're just counting votes. I'd recommend leaving it for someone with more experience. – ]] 17:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Bradv}}, no I'm not counting the votes merely. I've summarized as a saw it. What further concern is there? {{]}} ] ] 17:54, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::First of all, you listed the numbers at the top, as if that was somehow the determining factor for how the RfC was to be closed. Secondly, your summaries of the arguments were rather dismissive of the time and effort people put into constructing them. It's fine to summarize arguments, but they must be respectful. Thirdly, what's with that weird writing at the end with a mix of upper- and lowercase letters? Is that a joke? Fourthly, the fact that I have to explain this to you in such detail is ''prima facie'' evidence that you don't have enough experience to close RfCs yet. Hence my recommendation that you leave it for someone else to close. I hope this helps. – ]] 18:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::If I closed it merely by a vote, then it would be "Vote count: (1/2/3) Option C" and no other statements. Clearly I didn't close it by the plain vote. For the summary of the arguments, nearly all of the Option A !votes had to do with "useful". So in a short summary, it was useful. Option B !votes were to move out of template space so readers wouldn't get confused between an article and a template. Option C, templates shouldn't be treated as articles. I'm not sure what was dismissive and disrespectful. The rest is irrelevant, but '''what matters how I addressed the consensus'''. <br>I appreciate constructive criticism and feedback, but I also think your closing revert was not warranted since nothing seemed excessively wrong. I'd think a closing review would be appropriate (which I think there is. I forgot where it is.) {{]}} ] ] 19:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Hey Can I Log In, I appreciate you trying to help. I can tell that you're doing your best to contribute in the ways that you find interesting, and I'm glad you're working on. I remember how excited I was to work in certain administrative areas when I first started editing as well. This is a discussion that would be difficult for anyone to close; I've been an active editor for well over half a decade now, and it would take me several hours of reading, contemplation, and writing to close this discussion. I hope you understand why other editors here are disappointed that you've closed this discussion, and in the manner that you have. Your summaries of the positions of the supporters of the three options were not representative of the actual opinions voiced, and can be perceived as disrespectful. Your closure did not demonstrate an understanding of the issues at play. You did not substantively address the discussion other than declaring simply that {{tq|1=The main consensus here is to move them out of template space and preserve it}}. If you brought this for review at an administrative noticeboard, I wouldn't fancy your chances. And since you don't seem to be aware of that, I really don't think you should be closing discussions or working in similar areas for the time being. I don't mean that as criticism; it takes anyone a ''long'' time (years and years) to understand the norms and culture critical to engaging well in these areas. Best, ''']''' (<small>aka</small> ] '''·''' ] '''·''' ]) 19:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Thanks for your feedback. And if ever I do close another not so clear discussion, I ''will'' take these feedback into consideration when closing whether that's in an hour, tomorrow, months, years, whenever.<br>Of course, we all want to try something new, and it may not be what people want to expect at the end result even though we try to attempt to do it in <s>good faith</s> <u>not intended to cause problems</u>, like in this situation. {{]}} ] ] 19:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've got a significant concern that you're ] and shouldn't be doing much more than playing with userboxes on your user page at this time. ] (]) 18:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC); edited 00:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{u|Nick}}, I'm not sure what part of ] you're referencing. Which of my last show me being incompetent? Please show and connect and make sure it's not in ]. I'm waiting. And if you think all I should be doing is editing in my userspace, then how is that contributing to the encyclopedia? Please tell me and I'll take your advice. ]" <br> Now if you'll excuse me, I need to ignore your advice and answer a ]. {{]}} ] ] 19:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Isn't the dreadful closure above and the risk of an indefinite block for automated editing enough to question your competence ? ] (]) 19:30, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::::The "dreadful" closure was made in <s>good faith</s> <u>not intended to cause problems</u>. Of course, we all do things differently when we try to do it well. As for the ''unapproved'' automated editing, well 1 warning and done. If I ignore the warning, then that would mean I agree to be sanctioned. Since I am complying with the warning, no sanctions for the incident is neccessary.<br>You are citing ''non-chronic'' problems which were ''first time'' issues. If I were to cause problems ''intentionally, repeatedly, and severely'', then sure my competence can be questioned. But my past behavior doesn't meet all three. {{]}} ] ] 19:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC); edited 00:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::{{u|Can I Log In}} I would hope you would take the feedback of the three veteran editors (now four with me) seriously. If you're upset by comments here (and I understand why you would be) you can always step away and come back to edit when you're in a better frame of mind. The best way to show your competent is to have your next edits show that competency rather than continuing to reply here. ] (]) 19:56, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::Yes, I do ''strongly'' acknowledge and take the feedback that I receive from the admins or anyone.<br>I do wonder all a sudden, where are these uninvolved admins coming from? Do you watch the talk pages of recent problematic users? I assume this is the case. {{]}} ] ] 20:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::I think they watch list of ongoing RfCs, or recently closed RfCs, or RfCs whose closure has been undone; or all of these. —usernamekiran ] 20:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::] reply by an admin and these replies by the same admin ] show something different. And plus, do they even go on the talk pages of users who closed RfCs (if uninvolved with the closer)? {{]}} ] ] 20:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::I saw that you edited bbb23's userpage, and I checked your contributions in an attempt to find out why. That's how I found this RfC close. The other admins here may have been drawn by the same edit, or by your post on my talk page. Admins tend to watch each other's talk pages, and an edit to an admin's user page is always going to draw a fair amount of attention. – ]] 22:00, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::OH regarding that edit, it was including subcats. So I edited it to remove the subcat counts. Well later, it was reverted, now that inaccuracy remains, and here we are. '''Something small can be big.'''<br>How is one's contributions supposed to be a clue in investigating an edit to a userpage? {{]}} ] ] 22:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :{{od|:::::::::::}}Speaking as the editor who reverted that change (though actually I've had your page on my watchlist for a while, ever since I wrote you a note about your April Fool's Day activities): when an editor does something problematic, it's pretty standard procedure to look at that user's recent contributions to see if they're being disruptive. And please don't deflect by saying it's "inaccurate": it's not your userpage, and unless you're reverting vandalism or you know the editor sufficiently well that you are sure that they won't have a problem with your edits, you should never touch someone else's userpage. Period. | |||
| : | |||
| :Now, speaking as a fellow editor who jumped into the deep end of the wiki a little too early: "good faith" doesn't mean "correct" and doesn't excuse you from getting a boot for messing up. If someone significantly more experienced than you is telling you that you did something wrong, don't start a policy argument, don't assume that everyone's out to get you, just stop. If you don't understand what the problem is, ask, but think about your phrasing - don't say "you're wrong because of policy X," say "I thought policy X said that I was supposed to do Y, could you explain why Y was wrong?" ] (]) 23:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh did I say that "good faith" = "correct"? I'm pretty sure what I was trying to say was "good faith" = "not intended to cause problems". Hold on, let me fix that. <span class="nowrap">] '''Done'''</span><!--template:done--> <br>Also, are you calling my edit to Bbb's userpage "problematic"? In addition, I'm not sure where the policy argument took place, so I'm not sure why you are stating this. I even ''asked'' instead of arguing. Of course if I did something wrong (probably for first time doing something) that is unclear to me, I would ask, and I clearly did. What more is there? {{]}} ] ] 00:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ===RfC closed=== | |||
| So the RfC in concern has been closed. So if someone drives by and would be willing to ''constructively'' explain to be the difference between and , it would be great. {{]}} ] ] 04:05, 29 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :I find the differences to be minimal. There is one substantive one - they did not insert a joke at the end of the close - but that isn't really enough to say they're different. So my issues continue and know that at least I am contemplating what my next step is in regards to this close. Best, ] (]) 04:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Final warning == | |||
| Hi, I’m letting you know that while you may have good intentions, your behavior in project space and the behind the scenes area of Misplaced Pages are disruptive, because you don’t know enough about how our project works to act in a way that follows our generally accepted norms. Please focus on content and actions that help improve the public facing side of this project. Continued disruption in project space and similar areas may result in sanctions. This could include an indefinite block if it’s needed to prevent disruption. ] (]) 00:56, 4 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :By recent, I assume you are rererring to and . A grammatical and interpretation dispute. {{]}} ] ] 01:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::And the other discussions on this talk page and the events that led to them. I count closing RfCs as behind the scenes work, same with messing with deletion templates and reverse engineering a script that requires permission to use. ] (]) 01:10, 4 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::Hi Can I Log In. I see that you got a warning from one of our fellow admins TonyBallioni. As he said, I think your best bet would be to focus on our mission in the areas that people are more likely to see. I have been given before for similar behavior. Admins only block if there is a risk of disruption, so one way you can stop disrupting is to read our ] for rules and best practices in the areas where you may be causing disruption. You can do the same for articles as well, though you can make any edit using your own common sense (maybe with a little help from the ]). I trust that you can ]. <span style="font-variant: small-caps;">]]]]]</span> 07:21, 4 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Stay out of Misplaced Pages space == | |||
| For what earthly reason are you ? You are not an admin nor an experienced user. | |||
| And . | |||
| You were just warned about your behavior in the back end of Misplaced Pages and you're still out doing this? ] (]) 18:24, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm cutting down my Misplaced Pages space edits. My current focus is ] (for the most part). I've understood the above messages, and I'm not going to continue this behavior anymore. <code>{{]|]}}</code>'s ] page! 18:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{u|Can I Log In}}, I hope you continue improving articles through GOCE. I hope you also realize the difference between making a general comment at Eek's RfA about using correct pronouns (something I truly and deeply believe in even though I make mistakes sometimes including with Eek) and calling out a specific editor. Especially because your comment to that editor was pretty aggressive. ] (]) 18:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == My ] request == | |||
| {{atop|{{moved to|]}}}} | |||
| Hello, I am here to explain myself and reply to your comments. About the first section, In the book ''Trucking in the Age of Information'' Chelsea White covers J.B. Hunt technology use for their load optimization. I cannot share with you the book but I can send you the link to a paragraph in the 2nd chapter of the book that I think will suffice. <ref>{{cite web |last1=Iii |first1=Chelsea White |title=Trucking in the Age of Information |url=https://books.google.co.ve/books?id=WLlHDwAAQBAJ&q=software#v=onepage&q=Load%20optimization&f=false |publisher=Routledge |language=en |date=18 January 2018}}</ref> | |||
| About the second section, I understand and I was not aware I was violating copyrights but the information is correct. Allow me to rephrase: | |||
| <nowiki>==== Safety ====</nowiki> | |||
| J.B. Hunt has implemented hair testing for all pre-employment tests since May 2006, in addition to ] (FMCSA) mandated urine testing.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fiorentino |first1=Dary |title=Operator drug- and alcohol-testing across modes |publisher=Transportation Research Board |isbn=9780309223447 |page=31}}</ref> Hair testing can detect prior drug usage for up to 90 days.<ref>{{cite web |title=Hair follicle drug test: How it works, what to expect, and accuracy |url=https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/325013#what-is-it |website=www.medicalnewstoday.com |language=en}}</ref> Drivers are also trained and certified in the safety training program Smith System, the company understand that the drivers' education is paramount to reduce accidents and save lives.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Babcock |first1=Stephane |title=Fleets Share COVID-19 Driver Safety Insights |url=https://www.truckinginfo.com/356173/ata-webinar-fleets-highlight-their-covid-19-experiences |work=www.truckinginfo.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Schmidt |first1=Ally |title=What sets J.B. Hunt apart from its competitors? |url=https://marketrealist.com/2015/01/sets-j-b-hunt-apart-competitors/ |website=Market Realist |date=2 January 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Public Safety |url=https://www.jbhunt.com/company/investor_relations/esg/public-safety/}}</ref> | |||
| Thanks, let me know your opinion. {{reflist-talk}} ] (]) 21:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, I am just asking about your username. It is a bit odd. Could you explain why you chose that? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Yes, I'll take a look at this soon (within 24 hours). <code>{{]|]}}</code>'s ] page! 22:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| {{abottom}} | |||
| ::Hello, I hope you are doing very well. I am here again to ask for your opinion on my new request ], RandomCanadian answered but I don't think his statement was solid as he only says that the request probably doesnt go. Thanks ] (]) 12:42, 17 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Congraulations! == | |||
| <!--https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Can_I_Log_In&diff=955451411&oldid=955450590--> | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Contrib Contest: 1st place!''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You have the most contributions of any user I have seen, and I have seen thousands upon thousands! Amazing, huh? ] (]) 21:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :{{re|Oneillge2029}} Hi. On wikipedia there are 11 editors who have more than 1 million each. You can see more info at ]. Regards, —usernamekiran ] 22:06, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the barnstar. {{u|Oneillge2029}} you might want to check out ]. <code>{{]|]}}</code>'s ] page! 22:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yup. for ]. I'll quarentine this as a non-so deserving barnstar. <code>{{]|]}}</code>'s ] page! 22:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Ecem Güzel == | |||
| Hello: | |||
| I had a look at the article ] which you copy edited. Apart from a few words that I tweeked, and the addition of a wiki link in the opening paragraph, your copy edit was fine. Thanks so much for your work on the drive and welcome to the Guild! If you ever have any questions do not hesitate to contact me. | |||
| Regards, | |||
| ] (]) 12:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the feedback. I was checking for a ] in a ] ], and it turns out your feedback contains a ! <code>{{]|]}}</code>'s ] page! 21:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Copy edit of Lori Loughlin == | |||
| Providing some feedback on your copy edit of ]: | |||
| *Starting in the infobox and throughout the article you changed en dashes to the rarely used figure dash (‒). I'm not sure what that was about. An en-dash is the appropriate character for indicating a range (in the majority of uses) and later as a spaced en-dash to indicate a break in thought. See ] for more information. The GOCE expects completed copy edits to be correct for punctuation, so it is important to understand Misplaced Pages's style rules for dashes and hyphens. (These should all be changed back to en dashes and hyphens for the hyphenated surnames.) | |||
| *You changed {{tq|She has one younger brother}} → {{tq|Loughlin has one younger brother}}. While ] recommends using surnames for tone, we should be careful when it might be confusing. That paragraph is talking about her family, where everyone shares the surname ''Loughlin''. I personally think that ''she'' was a shade less confusing in the flow of the passage, but it's a fairly minor point. In cases like this it might be worth considering a total rephrase. | |||
| *{{tq|Loughlin attended Oaks School #3}} We don't like using the numero characer (#) which is not universally understood to mean "number" and which has the possibility of being misinterpreted as markup code (]). Again, this is a matter of punctuation and should be addressed. Since it has a generic use and is not part of a title, change it to {{Abbr|No.|number}} | |||
| *You linked ]. Please consider carefully what to link based on what is likely to be useful to the reader. Here, I would consider this to be ] because a couple words later the article links '']'' which is more likely to be of interest to the reader. That article links to ABC in its lead, so the reader can get to the ABC article easily enough if they do happen to be interested in that. It is usually more useful to link to specific targets, which tend to have the more general targets linked in their leads (it's easier to navigate from a specific topic to a general topic than vice-versa) | |||
| *{{tq|From 1983 to 1988, Loughlin appeared in a number of feature films and television guest spots.}} You changed number → many. Both terms are vague. Her filmography, though it may not be complete, lists six movie and nine television appearances. So I'd probably use "more than a dozen". | |||
| *{{tq|From 1988 to 1995, Loughlin was cast in the ABC sitcom '']'' as ], ]'s (]) co-host, and later, ]' (]) wife.}} Way too much overlinking there, and I don't know why all that context is necessary. I'd trim everything after the second comma. | |||
| **Oh, it should be ]'s (]). I missed that the first time, it's easy to miss punctuation around references and wikilinks, so try to pay attention in those places. | |||
| *You changed {{tq|Initially set for a six-episode arc}} → {{tq|She was initially set for a six-episode arc}} which changes the subject from her appearance to the actor herself. I feel that a rephrase would be in order, changing the verb to something clearer. | |||
| *{{tq|From 2004 to 2005, Loughlin co-created, produced, and starred in}} you added the ] before ''and''. If you decide that this suits the style of the article, please make sure to apply it consistently throughout the article (there is a place in the lead missing a serial comma). | |||
| *I noticed that at the end of the last paragraph, you moved a reference into a citation template but did not preserve all of the parameter data. | |||
| * In the lead, you changed {{tq|charged with conspiracy to commit ] and ]}} → {{tq|charged with conspiracy to commit ]}}. I agree that the lead should be a summary and specifying all the charges there isn't necessary. However, the individual charges don't seem to be given in the bribery scandal section, and by removing them from the lead you're removing them from the article altogether. This is really the fault of the editors who were previously working on the article, who added to the lead instead of adding to the body. Nonetheless, copy editors should be cautious about this when removing content. I feel that the charges could be added near the beginning of the second paragraph of the bribery scandal section (with citation, the NBC one will do), and all the charges be summarized in the lead (more charges were added in October 2019) perhaps "charged with fraud- and bribery-related offences" or similar. | |||
| *{{tq|put their ] home on sale}} Needs a comma after ''Colorado'' (]). This is easy to miss because of the wikilink brackets, so try to watch in those places. | |||
| Other notes: | |||
| *The lead could probably use a rewrite. The first paragraph is too "listy" and not a proper summary/introduction for the article. Also, if you set the list aside, it gives too much prominence to the recent charges which makes it unbalanced. | |||
| *The bribery scandal section gets a bit repetitive, and could probably use a rewrite. However, it's a breaking-news thing which is going to keep getting updated, and may not be worth spending a lot of time on it until it stabilizes. | |||
| I know some of this is pretty picky, but copy editing is about paying attention to these little details. I hope you take this constructively. I think you overall made improvements to the article and are on the right track, but I'd appreciate it if you went back and fixed the punctuation and a couple other things. Please ping me if you have any questions. – ] (]) 13:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :Got it. I will resume the copy edit. <code>{{]|]}}</code>'s ] page! 16:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :{{u|Reidgreg}}, to address the feedback about the dash, I use U+2012 for en-dash instead of using {{tlx|endash}} or <code>&ndash;</code>. They were initially em-dashes as I saw it with ctrl-F and U+2013, so I massed change them with the source editor's advanced search and replace tool. <code>{{]|]}}</code>'s ] page! 19:22, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::It is possible that you have the wrong code? ] says that the en dash is U+2013 and the em dash is U+2014. You can also use the markup &ndash; and &mdash; which are less cryptic. – ] (]) 22:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::Yup. Got the Unicode wrong by 1 unit. Always use the HTML wikitext. ‒ (U+2012) is not – (U+2013), even though they look the same. <code>{{]|]}}</code>'s ] page! 22:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == on my JABBERWOKY edits == | |||
| I tried to find a place to message you dumb editors but it is impossible to find. So instead I just put the message in the page knowing you editors would get it. | |||
| Honestly, wikipedia has become a top heavy dictatorship of "don't touch our stuff." I have had first hand knowledge content I offered sometime back removed despite knowing more about the subject than any person alive (Towers in Canada). | |||
| When I visited the Jabberwoky page and saw the cacophony of ridiculous and pathetic over editing, clearly by the editors, with ZERO evidence of the poem, I knew Misplaced Pages was doomed instantly. | |||
| I used to love visiting Misplaced Pages, but the editors, as can be very clearly seen on the Jabberwoky page, have become the uber-bureaucratic garbage that Misplaced Pages was set up to address as being destructive to Encyclopedic knowledge. I have no idea what happened to Misplaced Pages, but it is getting worse everyday and is now becoming the new Yahoo search Engine. | |||
| So sad. P.S. Where the fuck is the Jabberwoky Poem and a fucking link where I just send you schmucks a message over such things??? | |||
| Thank you for your time, and I hope you are all safe and healthy during this terrible pandemic. The above is nothing personal, seriously, I just want to get your attention over this terrible example of a Wiki page that's inexplicable. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:44, May 22, 2020 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign --> | |||
| == Your submission at ]: ] has been accepted == | |||
| <div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> | |||
| Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br /> | |||
| The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its ]. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they ] over time. You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article. | |||
| <div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now ] without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to ] if you prefer.</div> | |||
| If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to ] without posting a request to ].</span> | |||
| If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}. | |||
| Thanks again, and happy editing! | |||
| ] (]) 02:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> | |||
Latest revision as of 03:47, 3 November 2024
User Page Dashboard Biography Talk Page
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is Can I Log In's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
Can I Log In prefers to receive notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to him on other pages. No talkback messages are needed.
 |
|
 |
{{Ping|Can I Log In}}), so that I will be notified. |
| A belated welcome! |
|---|
  Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Misplaced Pages, Can I Log In. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Misplaced Pages:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Misplaced Pages:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! User:SSSB (talk) 17:17, 6 July 2019 (UTC) SSSB (talk) 16:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC) |
Kumbharia Jain Temples
Hi Can I Log In Thanks a lot for your help in improving the quality of the article Kumbharia Jain Temples. - Pratyk321 —Preceding undated comment added 18:45, September 9, 2020