Revision as of 12:11, 28 May 2020 editOrgullomoore (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,243 edits continue work on refsTags: content sourced to vanity press Visual edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:41, 7 November 2024 edit undoMeters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers172,203 edits Undid revision 1255929938 by Tjmkxita (talk) MOSTag: Undo | ||
(31 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Jokes about lawyers}} | |||
{{citation style|date=August 2016}} | |||
'''Lawyer jokes''', which |
'''Lawyer jokes''', which pre-date ]'s era, are commonly told by those outside the profession as an expression of ], ] and ].<ref name="Galanter">{{cite book|author=Galanter|first=Marc|url=https://archive.org/details/loweringbarlawye0000gala_b4m7 |url-access=registration |via=] |title=Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes and Legal Culture|publisher=University of Wisconsin Press|year=2006|isbn=978-0-299-21354-1}}</ref> They serve as a form of ] or ] reflecting the ]. | ||
⚫ | ==Historical examples== | ||
Shakespeare's ''Henry VI, Part 2'' has the joke: | |||
{{quote|The first thing we do, ]|"Dick the Butcher" in Shakespeare's '']'', act 4, scene 2, line 73<ref>{{Cite book|title=Kill all the lawyers?: Shakespeare's legal appeal|last=Kornstein|first=Daniel|publisher=University of Nebraska Press|year=2005|isbn=978-0803278219|pages=22|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gh8iA6IeNNkC&pg=PA22}}</ref>|title=|source=}} | {{quote|The first thing we do, ]|"Dick the Butcher" in Shakespeare's '']'', act 4, scene 2, line 73<ref>{{Cite book|title=Kill all the lawyers?: Shakespeare's legal appeal|last=Kornstein|first=Daniel|publisher=University of Nebraska Press|year=2005|isbn=978-0803278219|pages=22|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gh8iA6IeNNkC&pg=PA22}}</ref>|title=|source=}} | ||
⚫ | ==Historical examples== | ||
In 1728, ] wrote this verse as part of '']'': | In 1728, ] wrote this verse as part of '']'': | ||
{{poemquote|A Fox may steal your hens, sir | {{poemquote|A Fox may steal your hens, sir | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
It ever was decreed, sir | It ever was decreed, sir | ||
If Lawyer's Hand is fee'd, sir | If Lawyer's Hand is fee'd, sir | ||
He steals your whole estate<ref name="Galanter" />{{rp|72}} | He steals your whole estate<ref name="Galanter" />{{rp|72}}}} | ||
At the end of the 1800s, ] satirically defined ''litigation'' as "a machine which you go into as a pig and come out as a sausage".<ref>{{citation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5koRKbRGXMIC&pg=PA132 |title=Dracula was a Lawyer: Hundreds of Fascinating Facts from the World of Law |author= |
At the end of the 1800s, ] satirically defined ''litigation'' as "a machine which you go into as a pig and come out as a sausage".<ref>{{citation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5koRKbRGXMIC&pg=PA132 |title=Dracula was a Lawyer: Hundreds of Fascinating Facts from the World of Law |author=Erin Barrett |author-link=Erin Barrett |author2= Jack Mingo |publisher=Conari Press |date=Jan 31, 2002 |isbn=9781573247184}}</ref> | ||
The line "Doesn't it strike the company as a little unusual that a lawyer should have his hands in his own pockets?" is cited by Samuel Clemens (]) but likely originated earlier.<ref name="Galanter" />{{rp|71}} | The line "Doesn't it strike the company as a little unusual that a lawyer should have his hands in his own pockets?" is cited by Samuel Clemens (]) but likely originated earlier.<ref name="Galanter" />{{rp|71}} | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Recurring themes== | ==Recurring themes== | ||
In the modern era, many complaints about lawyers fall into five general categories: | In the modern era, many complaints about lawyers fall into five general categories: | ||
* abuse of litigation in various ways, including using dilatory tactics and false evidence and making frivolous arguments to the courts | * abuse of litigation in various ways, including using dilatory tactics and false evidence and making frivolous arguments to the courts | ||
* preparation of ], such as false deeds, contracts, or wills | * preparation of ], such as false deeds, contracts, or wills | ||
* ] clients and other persons and misappropriating property | * ] clients and other persons and misappropriating property | ||
* ] in dealings with clients | * ] in dealings with clients | ||
* charging excessive ]s<ref>{{Cite book| |
* charging excessive ]s<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Hazard|first1=Geoffrey C.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1pcFGm5DZDkC&pg=PA60|title=Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study|last2=Dondi|first2=Angelo|date=2004|publisher=Stanford University Press|isbn=978-0-8047-4882-7|pages=60|language=en}}</ref> | ||
A recurring theme, historically and today, is that of exorbitant legal fees consuming the entire value of property at stake in an estate or a dispute: | A recurring theme, historically and today, is that of exorbitant legal fees consuming the entire value of property at stake in an estate or a dispute: | ||
{{quote|How many lawyers does it take to ]?<br/>How many can you afford?}} | {{quote|How many lawyers does it take to ]?<br />How many can you afford?}} | ||
Or: | Or: | ||
Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The tale of the freshly-acquitted horse thief pleading that the judge issue an arrest warrant for "that dirty lawyer of mine" because "Your honour, you see, I didn't have the money to pay his fee, so he went and took the horse I stole"<ref>{{Cite book|last=Alley|first=Ken|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u4k2UNKR9VIC&pg=PA310|title=The Encyclopedia of Wit, Humor, and Wisdom: The Big Book of Little Anecdotes|date=2000-07-11|publisher=iUniverse |
The tale of the freshly-acquitted horse thief pleading that the judge issue an arrest warrant for "that dirty lawyer of mine" because "Your honour, you see, I didn't have the money to pay his fee, so he went and took the horse I stole"<ref>{{Cite book|last=Alley|first=Ken|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u4k2UNKR9VIC&pg=PA310|title=The Encyclopedia of Wit, Humor, and Wisdom: The Big Book of Little Anecdotes|date=2000-07-11|publisher=iUniverse|isbn=978-1-4620-9229-1|pages=310|language=en}}</ref> is often modernised to "he went and took the car I stole"<ref>{{Cite book|last=Callaway|first=Robert W.|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AW41gB7RpJgC&pg=PA12|title=Party Jokes|date=2004-12-01|publisher=AuthorHouse|isbn=978-1-4208-1401-9|pages=12|language=en}}</ref> with little or nothing else changed. | ||
While telling an ] risks the label of ], lawyers are perceived as a highly privileged class, seemingly accountable only to other lawyers; the Bar Association, the judges, even many of the politicians and legislators are their fellow lawyers who inevitably give them free rein. After all, one does not choose one's ethnicity but may choose whether to pursue a career in law.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/738380488|title=Studies in applied interpersonal communication|publisher=SAGE|year=2008|isbn=978-1-4129-9030-1|editor-last=Motley|editor-first=Michael T.|location=Los Angeles|pages=236|oclc=738380488}}</ref> | While telling an ] risks the label of ], lawyers are perceived as a highly privileged class, seemingly accountable only to other lawyers; the Bar Association, the judges, even many of the politicians and legislators are their fellow lawyers who inevitably give them free rein. After all, one does not choose one's ethnicity but may choose whether to pursue a career in law.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/738380488|title=Studies in applied interpersonal communication|publisher=SAGE|year=2008|isbn=978-1-4129-9030-1|editor-last=Motley|editor-first=Michael T.|location=Los Angeles|pages=236|oclc=738380488}}</ref> | ||
Line 46: | Line 45: | ||
Of those of all the professions, lawyer jokes are often the most blunt and to the point: | Of those of all the professions, lawyer jokes are often the most blunt and to the point: | ||
{{quote|What is the difference between a catfish and a lawyer?<br/>One is a scum-sucking, bottom-feeding scavenger. The other is a fish.}} | {{quote|What is the difference between a catfish and a lawyer?<br />One is a scum-sucking, bottom-feeding scavenger. The other is just a fish.}} | ||
Or: | Or: | ||
{{quote|Why don't sharks eat lawyers?<br/>Professional courtesy.<ref>{{citation |
{{quote|Why don't sharks eat lawyers?<br />Professional courtesy.<ref>{{citation |title=The book of legal anecdotes |author=Peter Hay |publisher=Barnes & Noble|date= 1989 |isbn=9780880299763}}</ref>}} | ||
Much like the foul-mouthed ] or the ], the heartless, cynical attorney is a stock character in many joke collections. | Much like the foul-mouthed ] or the ], the heartless, cynical attorney is a stock character in many joke collections. | ||
Often told is the anecdote where a wealthy lawyer, solicited for a charitable donation, replies "Do you realise my mother is dying of a long-term illness and has medical bills several times her income? Did you know that my brother, a disabled veteran, is blind and in a wheelchair? Do you understand my sister is widowed and penniless with three dependent children? Well, since I don't give any money to them, why should I give any to you?"<ref>{{Cite book |
Often told is the anecdote where a wealthy lawyer, solicited for a charitable donation, replies "Do you realise my mother is dying of a long-term illness and has medical bills several times her income? Did you know that my brother, a disabled veteran, is blind and in a wheelchair? Do you understand my sister is widowed and penniless with three dependent children? Well, since I don't give any money to them, why should I give any to you?"<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1QZhHbxsoeIC&pg=PA68|title=Laughter Ever After Ministryof Good Humor|publisher=Chalice Press|isbn=978-0-8272-2145-1|pages=68|language=en}}</ref> | ||
Similarly: | Similarly: | ||
{{quote|Lawyer: "I have some good news for you"<br/>Client: "What good news? You lost my case, I was convicted of a murder I did not commit and was sentenced to die in the ]."<br/>Lawyer: "That's all true, but I got the voltage lowered."<ref |
{{quote|Lawyer: "I have some good news for you"<br />Client: "What good news? You lost my case, I was convicted of a murder I did not commit and was sentenced to die in the ]."<br />Lawyer: "That's all true, but I got the voltage lowered."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Wallwork|first=Adrian|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AThDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA67|title=Jokes: Have a Laugh and Improve Your English|date=2017-12-14|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-319-67247-2|pages=67|language=en}}</ref>|author=|title=|source=}} | ||
Other anecdotes are based on ], such as a lawyer defending a client on trial for killing his parents: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I appeal to your basic decency to take mercy on this poor, defenceless ]!"<ref>{{cite book|author1=John Capps|author2=Donald Capps|title=You've Got To Be Kidding!: How Jokes Can Help You Think|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DAcJ7aUXZ44C&pg=PA55|date=15 September 2009|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-4051-9665-9|page=55}}</ref> | Other anecdotes are based on ], such as a lawyer defending a client on trial for killing his parents: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I appeal to your basic decency to take mercy on this poor, defenceless ]!"<ref>{{cite book|author1=John Capps|author2=Donald Capps|title=You've Got To Be Kidding!: How Jokes Can Help You Think|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DAcJ7aUXZ44C&pg=PA55|date=15 September 2009|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-4051-9665-9|page=55}}</ref> | ||
Line 66: | Line 65: | ||
] is the patron saint of lawyers. In some jokes, he is the only lawyer in heaven, and can't be made to leave, since there is no other lawyer in heaven.<ref name="Galanter" />{{rp|107}} | ] is the patron saint of lawyers. In some jokes, he is the only lawyer in heaven, and can't be made to leave, since there is no other lawyer in heaven.<ref name="Galanter" />{{rp|107}} | ||
==Gag names== | |||
]'') is visible in 2004 on the third floor window above the corner of Brattle and JFK Streets, in ], ].]] | |||
A common theme in lawyer jokes is to present a lawyer or law firm, particularly in ] settings, with a ] such as the commonly used "]"<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KwatUOmKCrUC&q=dewey+cheatem+and+howe&pg=PA108|author=Gerald P. Koocher, Patricia Keith-Spiegel|publisher=]|year=1998|title=Ethics in psychology: professional standards and cases |page=108|isbn=978-0-19-509201-1}}</ref> (a ] on the phrase "Do we ] 'em? ]!"<ref>{{cite book |last1=Jackson |first1=William J. |title=American Tricksters: Thoughts on the Shadow Side of a Culture's Psyche |date=18 December 2014 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-62564-790-0 |page=116 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UUwSBgAAQBAJ&dq=Dewey+Cheatem+%26+Howe&pg=PA116 |access-date=12 January 2023 |language=en}}</ref>). The gag name pokes fun at the perceived propensity of legal professionals to take advantage of their clients. This gag name is also used more broadly as a ] for any hypothetical law firm.<ref>{{cite web|title=The Fullname Citation Style|url=http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/~shieber/Distrib/Sources/fullname/fullname-doc.ps|publisher=]|access-date=2010-03-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=LaTeX letter using "appmhead" styles|url=http://amath.colorado.edu/documentation/LaTeX/Letterhead/Sample1.html|publisher=]|access-date=2010-03-09|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100611171817/http://amath.colorado.edu/documentation/LaTeX/Letterhead/Sample1.html|archive-date=2010-06-11}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Math 103, Fall 2009, questions for final exam televised review, with solutions|url=http://rutv.rutgers.edu/pdf/math-103-f09-solutions.pdf|publisher=]|access-date=2010-03-09|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100702220834/http://rutv.rutgers.edu/pdf/math-103-f09-solutions.pdf|archive-date=2010-07-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Meet Your Clients - Consumer Protection - Fall 2002|url=http://law.gsu.edu/mbudnitz/fall02/meetclients_law7155.pdf|publisher=]|access-date=2010-03-09|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091115062752/http://law.gsu.edu/mbudnitz/fall02/meetclients_law7155.pdf|archive-date=2009-11-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Research Memo Assignment|url=http://faculty.law.lsu.edu/ccorcos/fall2002/Researchmemoassignment.htm|publisher=]|access-date=2010-03-10}}</ref> In this variation, the second name often varies somewhat with regards to spelling (Cheetem, Cheater, Cheethem, Cheatham, etc.), but also to the word upon which it is based (Screwum, Burnham, etc.).{{Citation needed|date=January 2023}} Another example is "]", often used as a comedic stand-in for ] lawyers in the UK.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Cross |first=Michael |date=2018-04-23 |title=Goodbye Sue, Grabbit & Runne? Defamation cases at new low |url=https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/goodbye-sue-grabbit-and-runne-defamation-cases-at-new-low/5065798.article |access-date=2023-10-28 |website=Law Gazette |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Eye of the storm |url=https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/eye-storm-0 |access-date=2023-10-28 |website=New Law Journal |language=en}}</ref> | |||
A popular poster for '']'' features the Stooges as bumbling members of such a firm,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.threestooges.com/2015/01/09/a-three-pattern-with-a-twist/|title=A Three Pattern with a Twist!|date=January 9, 2015|website=The Three Stooges}}</ref> with the actual episode using the name "Dewey, Burnham, and Howe". ] uses this example, among similar ones such as ] "Proba, Keister, and Wince" and ] "Ditcher, Quick, and Hyde." In the film ''Heavenly Daze'', Moe and Larry deal with a crooked attorney named "I. Fleecem" (I fleece 'em). ] used the phrase in the premiere 1986 edition of HBO's telethon "Comic Relief",<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58kexiDYTZ8&t=1516s| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200904050750/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58kexiDYTZ8&t=1516s| archive-date=2020-09-04 | url-status=dead|title=- YouTube|website=www.youtube.com}}</ref> and ] claimed that it was the name of his law firm in 1972.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.newspapers.com/clip/24096185/chicago-tribune/|title=Clipped From Chicago Tribune|date=January 7, 1972|pages=39|via=newspapers.com}}</ref> "Sue, Grabbitt and Runne" recurred in the British satirical magazine '']''.<ref name=":0" /> ], of ] '']'' radio program, named their business corporation "Dewey, Cheetham & Howe".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cartalk.com/content/about/history/|publisher=] (cartalk.com)|title=The History of Car Talk|access-date=2010-03-09}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= As the neighborhood changes, Harvard Square's 'Dewey, Cheetham & Howe' window lives on |website= Boston.com |access-date=1 September 2024 |first=Spencer |last= Buell |url= https://www.boston.com/news/the-boston-globe/2023/09/12/dewey-cheetham-howe-car-talk-harvard-square/ |quote=they hired someone to install authentic gold-leaf lettering like you’d find outside a respectable law firm...they had a lawyer pun spelled out: “Dewey, Cheetham & Howe”...Magliozzi admits they lifted it from “The Three Stooges”}}</ref> In 2001, a banker in Texas, who had experience coming up with gag names for staff training, reported a ] to the FBI when he noticed it was payable to "Howe" or "Howie Dewey Cheatham", leading to the client's conviction for ] and ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Adams |first1=Noah |author1-link=Noah Adams |title=Howe, Dewey, Cheatem |url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1128286 |access-date=12 January 2023 |work=] |publisher=] |date=2001-08-31 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Jennings |first1=Diane |title=No Stooges Need Apply: A Gag Trips Up Fraud |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/08/30/no-stooges-need-apply-a-gag-trips-up-fraud/4c165f8b-d744-41cf-8860-06fbdcb0c25d/ |access-date=12 January 2023 |newspaper=] |date=30 August 2001}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | == See also == | ||
* "]", an infamous joke told by a lawyer | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{ |
{{Reflist}} | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 09:41, 7 November 2024
Jokes about lawyersLawyer jokes, which pre-date Shakespeare's era, are commonly told by those outside the profession as an expression of contempt, scorn and derision. They serve as a form of social commentary or satire reflecting the cultural perception of lawyers.
Historical examples
Shakespeare's Henry VI, Part 2 has the joke:
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers
— "Dick the Butcher" in Shakespeare's Henry VI, Part 2, act 4, scene 2, line 73
In 1728, John Gay wrote this verse as part of The Beggar's Opera:
A Fox may steal your hens, sir
A Whore your health and pence, sir
Your daughter rob your chest, sir
Your wife may steal your rest, sir
A thief your goods and plate
But this is all but picking
With rest, pence, chest and chicken
It ever was decreed, sir
If Lawyer's Hand is fee'd, sir
He steals your whole estate
At the end of the 1800s, Ambrose Bierce satirically defined litigation as "a machine which you go into as a pig and come out as a sausage".
The line "Doesn't it strike the company as a little unusual that a lawyer should have his hands in his own pockets?" is cited by Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain) but likely originated earlier.
Recurring themes
In the modern era, many complaints about lawyers fall into five general categories:
- abuse of litigation in various ways, including using dilatory tactics and false evidence and making frivolous arguments to the courts
- preparation of false documentation, such as false deeds, contracts, or wills
- deceiving clients and other persons and misappropriating property
- procrastination in dealings with clients
- charging excessive fees
A recurring theme, historically and today, is that of exorbitant legal fees consuming the entire value of property at stake in an estate or a dispute:
How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb?
How many can you afford?
Or:
It takes only one lawyer to change your lightbulb to his lightbulb.
The tale of the freshly-acquitted horse thief pleading that the judge issue an arrest warrant for "that dirty lawyer of mine" because "Your honour, you see, I didn't have the money to pay his fee, so he went and took the horse I stole" is often modernised to "he went and took the car I stole" with little or nothing else changed.
While telling an ethnic joke risks the label of racism, lawyers are perceived as a highly privileged class, seemingly accountable only to other lawyers; the Bar Association, the judges, even many of the politicians and legislators are their fellow lawyers who inevitably give them free rein. After all, one does not choose one's ethnicity but may choose whether to pursue a career in law.
Of those of all the professions, lawyer jokes are often the most blunt and to the point:
What is the difference between a catfish and a lawyer?
One is a scum-sucking, bottom-feeding scavenger. The other is just a fish.
Or:
Why don't sharks eat lawyers?
Professional courtesy.
Much like the foul-mouthed parrot or the dumb blonde, the heartless, cynical attorney is a stock character in many joke collections.
Often told is the anecdote where a wealthy lawyer, solicited for a charitable donation, replies "Do you realise my mother is dying of a long-term illness and has medical bills several times her income? Did you know that my brother, a disabled veteran, is blind and in a wheelchair? Do you understand my sister is widowed and penniless with three dependent children? Well, since I don't give any money to them, why should I give any to you?"
Similarly:
Lawyer: "I have some good news for you"
Client: "What good news? You lost my case, I was convicted of a murder I did not commit and was sentenced to die in the electric chair."
Lawyer: "That's all true, but I got the voltage lowered."
Other anecdotes are based on logical fallacy, such as a lawyer defending a client on trial for killing his parents: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I appeal to your basic decency to take mercy on this poor, defenceless orphan!"
Occasionally, lawyers themselves use self-deprecating humour about lawyers or the legal profession in an attempt to add levity to otherwise bland topics. Lawyers giving a talk, especially to the profession, often employ jokes as icebreakers.
St. Ives is the patron saint of lawyers. In some jokes, he is the only lawyer in heaven, and can't be made to leave, since there is no other lawyer in heaven.
Gag names
A common theme in lawyer jokes is to present a lawyer or law firm, particularly in parody settings, with a gag name such as the commonly used "Dewey, Cheatem & Howe" (a pun on the phrase "Do we cheat 'em? And how!"). The gag name pokes fun at the perceived propensity of legal professionals to take advantage of their clients. This gag name is also used more broadly as a placeholder for any hypothetical law firm. In this variation, the second name often varies somewhat with regards to spelling (Cheetem, Cheater, Cheethem, Cheatham, etc.), but also to the word upon which it is based (Screwum, Burnham, etc.). Another example is "Sue, Grabbit and Runne", often used as a comedic stand-in for defamation lawyers in the UK.
A popular poster for The Three Stooges features the Stooges as bumbling members of such a firm, with the actual episode using the name "Dewey, Burnham, and Howe". The 2012 Three Stooges film uses this example, among similar ones such as proctologists "Proba, Keister, and Wince" and divorce lawyers "Ditcher, Quick, and Hyde." In the film Heavenly Daze, Moe and Larry deal with a crooked attorney named "I. Fleecem" (I fleece 'em). Catherine O'Hara used the phrase in the premiere 1986 edition of HBO's telethon "Comic Relief", and Soupy Sales claimed that it was the name of his law firm in 1972. "Sue, Grabbitt and Runne" recurred in the British satirical magazine Private Eye. Tom and Ray Magliozzi, of NPR's Car Talk radio program, named their business corporation "Dewey, Cheetham & Howe". In 2001, a banker in Texas, who had experience coming up with gag names for staff training, reported a cashier's check to the FBI when he noticed it was payable to "Howe" or "Howie Dewey Cheatham", leading to the client's conviction for money laundering and fraud.
See also
- "When a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this, they are going to have the last word", an infamous joke told by a lawyer
References
- ^ Galanter, Marc (2006). Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes and Legal Culture. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-21354-1 – via Open Library.
- Kornstein, Daniel (2005). Kill all the lawyers?: Shakespeare's legal appeal. University of Nebraska Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0803278219.
- Erin Barrett; Jack Mingo (Jan 31, 2002), Dracula was a Lawyer: Hundreds of Fascinating Facts from the World of Law, Conari Press, ISBN 9781573247184
- Hazard, Geoffrey C.; Dondi, Angelo (2004). Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study. Stanford University Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-8047-4882-7.
- Alley, Ken (2000-07-11). The Encyclopedia of Wit, Humor, and Wisdom: The Big Book of Little Anecdotes. iUniverse. p. 310. ISBN 978-1-4620-9229-1.
- Callaway, Robert W. (2004-12-01). Party Jokes. AuthorHouse. p. 12. ISBN 978-1-4208-1401-9.
- Motley, Michael T., ed. (2008). Studies in applied interpersonal communication. Los Angeles: SAGE. p. 236. ISBN 978-1-4129-9030-1. OCLC 738380488.
- Peter Hay (1989), The book of legal anecdotes, Barnes & Noble, ISBN 9780880299763
- Laughter Ever After Ministryof Good Humor. Chalice Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-8272-2145-1.
- Wallwork, Adrian (2017-12-14). Jokes: Have a Laugh and Improve Your English. Springer. p. 67. ISBN 978-3-319-67247-2.
- John Capps; Donald Capps (15 September 2009). You've Got To Be Kidding!: How Jokes Can Help You Think. John Wiley & Sons. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-4051-9665-9.
- Gerald P. Koocher, Patricia Keith-Spiegel (1998). Ethics in psychology: professional standards and cases. Oxford University Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-19-509201-1.
- Jackson, William J. (18 December 2014). American Tricksters: Thoughts on the Shadow Side of a Culture's Psyche. Wipf and Stock. p. 116. ISBN 978-1-62564-790-0. Retrieved 12 January 2023.
- "The Fullname Citation Style". Harvard University. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- "LaTeX letter using "appmhead" styles". University of Colorado Boulder. Archived from the original on 2010-06-11. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- "Math 103, Fall 2009, questions for final exam televised review, with solutions" (PDF). Rutgers University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-07-02. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- "Meet Your Clients - Consumer Protection - Fall 2002" (PDF). Georgia State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-11-15. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- "Research Memo Assignment". Louisiana State University. Retrieved 2010-03-10.
- ^ Cross, Michael (2018-04-23). "Goodbye Sue, Grabbit & Runne? Defamation cases at new low". Law Gazette. Retrieved 2023-10-28.
- "Eye of the storm". New Law Journal. Retrieved 2023-10-28.
- "A Three Pattern with a Twist!". The Three Stooges. January 9, 2015.
- "- YouTube". www.youtube.com. Archived from the original on 2020-09-04.
- "Clipped From Chicago Tribune". January 7, 1972. p. 39 – via newspapers.com.
- "The History of Car Talk". Car Talk (cartalk.com). Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- Buell, Spencer. "As the neighborhood changes, Harvard Square's 'Dewey, Cheetham & Howe' window lives on". Boston.com. Retrieved 1 September 2024.
they hired someone to install authentic gold-leaf lettering like you'd find outside a respectable law firm...they had a lawyer pun spelled out: "Dewey, Cheetham & Howe"...Magliozzi admits they lifted it from "The Three Stooges"
- Adams, Noah (2001-08-31). "Howe, Dewey, Cheatem". All Things Considered. NPR. Retrieved 12 January 2023.
- Jennings, Diane (30 August 2001). "No Stooges Need Apply: A Gag Trips Up Fraud". The Washington Post. Retrieved 12 January 2023.