Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:39, 24 December 2006 editLance6968 (talk \| contribs)1,551 edits →[] reported by User:CJCurrie (Result:)← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 22:24, 27 December 2024 edit undoToBeFree (talk \| contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators127,495 edits →User:103.84.130.238 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ): Page protected (using responseHelper)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Short description\|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
	<center>'''Do not continue a dispute on this page: Please keep on topic.'''</center>
			<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}\|{{pp\|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
	{{Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRHeader}}
			{{pp-move\|small=yes}}
	{{adminbacklog}}
			{{User:MiszaBot/config
	<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-3 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive31--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE-->
			\|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
			\|maxarchivesize = 250K
			\|counter = 490
			\|algo = old(2d)
			\|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
			\|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
			}}</noinclude>
			<!-- NOTE: THE BOTTOM IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Warned users) ==
	==Violations==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Giganotosaurus}} <br />
	Please place new reports '''at the bottom'''.
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|PaleoFile}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	===] reported by User:JDG (Result:)===
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->
	] violation on
	{{article\|Shroud of Turin}}. {{3RRV\|Codex_Sinaiticus}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	* Previous version reverted to:
			#
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:		#
	* 2nd revert:		#
	* 3rd revert:		#
	* 4th revert:

	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

	<!--
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
	-->
	''' Comments:''' This user, Codex Sinaiticus, is destroying a balance in the first paragraph of ] that took many weeks to work out back when the article was elevated to FA. He is doing this by inserting unproven/unprovable statements about the exact nature of image formation on the Shroud: that is, he insists it is a literal photographic negative process. Debate about the "negativeness" of the image is handled very well and in detail in the body of the article. Repeatedly inserting one-sided material on it in the intro paragraph is having an extremely destructive effect on the piece as a whole. ] 20:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC) <!-- Optional -->
	:This 3RR "violation" should be retracted, since the so-called "4th revert" above was not a revert at all, but the placement of a NPOV tag, since I am disputing the NPOV of the article. And while completely irrelevant to this page, the above is a total mischaracterization of my position; I am insisting nothing of the sort, only that this is one of the positions that should be represented, not suppressed. Thanks ] (]) 20:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

	rv 4 is the placement of an NPOV tag. To my surprise, this tag hasn't been warred over recently - unless you can show it has been within, say, a month, then its only 3R ] 21:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)
	===] reported by User:] (Result: 24h)===
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead
	] violation on
	{{Article\|Michael Savage (commentator)}}. {{3RRV\|EnglishEfternamn}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

	* ~~Previous~~ ~~version~~ ~~reverted~~ to:		'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	* 5th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			] \| ] 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
	<!--
			*Both users have been {{AN3\|w}}. ] (]) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
			*:Those users and {{userlinks\|Mei23448}} seems continuing edit wars on '']'' and '']'' articles.
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
			*:1.
	-->
	* ~~1st 3RR Warning~~		*:2.
	* ~~2nd 3RR Warning (by an admin)~~		*:3.
			*:4.
	''' Comments:''' This user continues to revert to his version of a ] article, inserting unsourced, POV information in violation of ], ] and others. When it is removed, he reinstates it, calling the removal "vandalism". He violated yesterday and was not reported. At least 5 editors, including two admins have attempted to explain what is wrong with his edits, but it has become clear he is just being obstinate. He has been warned at least three times by two different admins, both on his talk page and on the talk page of the article yet he continues to revert over 5 times just today.--] 21:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
			*:5.
			*:6.
			*:In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.
			*:Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing, while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) ] (]) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
			*::17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. ] (]) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
			*:::If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's ]. ] \| ] 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
			*::Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. ] (]) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
			*{{ping\|ToBeFree}} The problem persists, ] and ] continue their edit war / vandalism on both pages. --] (]) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
			*:Thank you very much for the notification, {{u\|Jens Lallensack}}. Both blocked indefinitely, the latter unlikely to be unblocked any time soon. ] (]) 13:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==
	24h ] 09:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Lindy Li}} <br />
	===] reported by ] (Result:)===
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Napoleonjosephine2020}}
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	] violation on
	{{Article\|Rated-RKO}}. {{3RRV\|67.80.238.244}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	* Previous version reverted to:
			#
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:		#
	* 2nd revert:		#
	* 3rd revert:		#
	* 4th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

	<!--
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
	-->

	''' Comments:''' I see that this is an anon user and probably doesn't know the rules, but I started a discussion for the (minor) change on the talk page and directed people in there in an edit summary, then dropped a note on the IPs talk page. Since their last edit was from that same IP they should have seen it.
	: Ok, just a comment myself. I read (did you?) the first paragraph which says, ''"If you find yourself in a revert war, it is a good idea to ensure that the "other side" is aware of the 3RR, especially if they are new, by leaving a warning about WP:3RR on their talk page. Administrators are unlikely to block a user who has never been warned. If you report a 3RR violation here it is good form to inform the person you are reporting of this on their talk page and provide a link to this page ]."'' Why even make this report when you haven't explained to them the WP:3RR rule yet, nor told them that you have made this report??


			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	''2006-12-21T23:41:12 Zoe (Talk \| contribs \| block) blocked "67.80.238.244 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 48 hours (multiple vandalisms to Team-RKO)'' ] 10:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' Zilch.
	===] reported by ] (Result: 24h)===

			'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
	] violation on
	{{Article\|History of Romania since 1989}}. {{3RRV\|Anonimu}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
	* Previous version reverted to: for first three and for the last one.
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. ] • ] • ] 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
	I've warned him on about the three reverts rule. He was also warned previously on by ]. He was previously blocked for violating the rule, as stated on his talk page.

			:The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? ] (]) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
	''' Comments:''' He preferred reverting to discussing these changes on the talk page. Also, his last revert is of a different section, but on the same issue. The recording has, in Romanian, ] saying (as mentioned by me on the commit): "Thanks for answering our call again", "The delegation of miners, lead by ], will head towards the University Square, which we want you to re-occupy", "I thank you all people you can count on, for good and especially for worse". Also, the French bit states "Iliescu appealed to the miners to re-establish order".
			::@]
			::"This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand ] and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. ] • ] • ] 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
			:::You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. ] (]) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
			::::Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. ] • ] • ] 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
			::::Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). , for those curious. ] (]) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
			*{{AN3\|b\|24 hours}} ] ] 06:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

			== ] and ] reported by ] (Result: Page already protected) ==
	:Gcbirzan was also in violation of 3RR. He should be blocked as well, correct? Or am I missing something? :) --]<sup>]</sup> 12:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Warburg effect (oncology)}} <br />
	:: Sorry. Forgot to note: 24h. As to Gcb... probably, though I haven't checked. Feel free ] 12:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C}} and {{userlinks\|2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE}}
	:: Hum. While I admit I was close to it, I haven't (I think, might be wrong.). The wasn't a revert. I cited sources. (Albeit unnecessarily, in my opinion...) ]<sup>]</sup> 15:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	===] reported by ] (Result:)===
			#
			#
			#
			# (second IP)


	] violation on
	{{Article\|Holodomor}}. {{3RRV\|A4}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

	* Previous version reverted to:

	* ~~1st~~ ~~revert~~:		'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page

			'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
	''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->
	User has been pushing a heavy POV agenda on this article for quite some time now (with offensive summaries like "remove trolling") and broke the 3RR rule, therefore a block is in order. Incidentally, user , so a little longer one might be in order. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 18:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
	===] reported by User:Pmanderson (Result:)===

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
			I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a stating {{tq\|I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here.}}, and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. {{userlinks\|CipherRephic}} was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. ] \| ] 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
			*{{AN3\|p}} ] (]) 16:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) ==
	] violation on
	{{Article\|History of the United States Congress}}. {{3RRV\|Rjensen}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Marc Benioff}}
	* Previous version reverted to:

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|99.98.190.59}}
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	''' Comments:''' four exact reversions, of two different versions, by two different editors; the edit summaries should make clear this is a substantive editing disagreement. The text reverted to, despite the lapse of time, is just before the first reverted edit. ] <small>]</small> 22:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	===] reported by User:] (Result:)===
			# {{diff2\|1265027253\|18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->
			# {{diff2\|1265009969\|16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
			# {{diff2\|1264902002\|03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
			# {{diff2\|1264865734\|23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	] violation on
			# {{diff2\|1265024674\|18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]."
	{{Article\|OffTopic.com}}. {{3RRV\|Jordanmills}}:
			# {{diff2\|1265033023\|18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule."
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	* Previous version reverted to:
			# {{diff2\|1265024924\|18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more"
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	<!--
			*{{AN3\|b\|2 weeks}} ] (]) 16:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
	-->

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 2 weeks) ==
	''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional --> Also note ], which uses the same exact edit summary ("rv repeated vandalism") and happened to come up at just the same time as Jordanmills did. ] 23:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Dune: Part Two}}
	:<s>] also performed the same revert and also blanked the talk page when someone warned him about his/her revert. ] 23:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)</s> Jackman added nonsense, but he didn't revert, sorry about that. ] 02:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|ChasePlowman2014}}
	===] reported by User:] (Result:)===
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	] violation on
	{{Article\|Console wars}}. {{3RRV\|ZakuSage}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	* Previous version reverted to:
			# {{diff2\|1265161751\|12:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
			# {{diff2\|1265079289\|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
	* 1st revert:
			# {{diff2\|1265038799\|19:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
	* 2nd revert:
			# {{diff2\|1264974672\|12:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	* 5th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	<!--
			# {{diff2\|1265079184\|00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring."
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
			# {{diff2\|1265080757\|00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule."
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
	-->

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional --> Ridiculous edit war. Filing a RFPP afer this 3RR report.
			# {{diff2\|1265080353\|00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section"
	:In my admittedly feeble defense, I was trying to bring the page back to pre-dispute status in order to get a proper discussion going of the proposed edits. Additionally, even though it really wouldn't matter after the third, the 4th listed is not a revert. - ]

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	===] reported by User:] (Result:)===
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

			User continues edit warring and doesn't discuss edits even after having been requested to, not even explaining their reversions in their edit summary. ] (]) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
	] violation on
			:{{u\|ChasePlowman2014}} is completely unresponsive. I hope they try editing during the 2 weeks of their block and notice that they have a talk page. ] (]) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
	{{Article\|Console wars}}. {{3RRV\|Josquius}}:
			*{{AN3\|b\|2 weeks}} ] (]) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->
			**Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the ] explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- ] <small>(] \| ])</small> 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
			**:{{u\|Jasca Ducato}}, this isn't about the time taken to respond to the noticeboard report. {{u\|ChasePlowman2014}} isn't using edit summaries nor talk pages and ignores warnings on their talk page about their behavior. ] (]) 04:36, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Declined) ==
	* Previous version reverted to:
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Ambedkar Jayanti}} <br />
	<!--
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Callmehelper}}
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
	-->

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional --> Ridiculous edit war. Filing a RFPP afer this 3RR report. ] 03:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	===] reported by User:] (Result:)===
			#
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->
			#
			#
			#

	] violation on
	{{Article\|Mel_Mermelstein}}. {{3RRV\|195.29.133.237}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

	* Previous version reverted to:
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

	* (first edit to page)
	''' Comments:''' I feel it is fair to revert to the other version because "removal of unsourced or poorly sourced negative material about living people is an excepted from the <nowiki></nowiki> rule". Also note that this IP is going against both my wishes and the wishes of . ] 06:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	===] reported by User:] (Result:] blocked for 24h for 4RR)===
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	] violation on
	{{Article\|Mel_Mermelstein}}. {{3RRV\|Samboy}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

	* ~~1st~~ ~~revert~~:		'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />Frequent edit warring by this user with several editors on an article falling under contentious and general sanctions. Also edit warring on ]. ] (]) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
	''' Comments:''' The user abuses the 3RR rule to repetedly revert the page without having contributed to content AT ALL or discussing my edits. The reverted version also contains proven errors and unsubstantiated claims, which both he and another user refuse to address (see last section of talk page).<!-- Optional -->
	*I have blocked ] for 3RR violation for 24 hours. Samboy only had 3 reverts in the last 24. -]<small>(]·]·])</small> 06:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

			:It's me @].
	===] reported by User:] (Result:)===
			:'''Clarification by my side ; '''
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->
			:Firstly I never ever got any Edit Warning before.
			:* ''Disputes details'' ;
			:# Firstly , I edit ] check history of that page from to
			:#''' process of reverting by others and my responses'''
			:** then and we had a little discussion on my talk page for this disputes ] then i thought matter would be solved.
			:*But other editor revert again by saying no need to improvement and my response of revert and discussion on his talk page ]
			:Then instead of healthy discussion this guy response me by saying you have problem with ambedkar article as well so first solve there
			:Now I want to clarify that this guy totally misused the healthy discussion and try to show like there is editing warning on me about Ambedkar Main article talk ] but this matter solve 1 month ago by further discussion on ]
			:So here in ambedkar page, there is nothing issue about any dispute about that discussion specifically.
			:the current discussion on Ambedkar page is going on about my changes that is under ] or not about new fresh topic. check last discussion on talk page ] this discussion is currently going on as there is no response given further by anyone yet.
			:so there is nothing like editing warning on me regarding Ambedkar page .
			:'''Conclusion'''
			:So all my point is whenever I edit, i edit with much responsiblity that this should be based on fact and figures with the valuable citations. I gave explanation of everything what i edit with sources and editing summary.
			:Some editor, i don't know what's want? they don't discuss on facts and sources.
			:i left a discussion on ] page for further discussion as well but response are so weak in my POV amd also misleading my claim and sources ].
			:I think, i clarify my side well enough. for further discussioni am on.
			:
			:I hope Administrator will look up this discussion/dispute from NPOV.
			:Much Regards. ] (]) 09:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
			::{{AN3\|d}} Discussion has started on the talk page. Let's let it play out. ] (]) 20:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24h) ==
	] violation on
	{{Article\|Ireland}}. {{3RRV\|Somethingoranother}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Angelo Rules}} <br />
	* Previous version reverted to:
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Johnny test person}}
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			'''Previous version reverted to:''' ]
	<!--
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
	-->

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	''' Comments:''' The last 48 hours of this user's edit history and ] more or less speak for themselves on this. Please note that the user also blanked his talk page in an apparent attempt to obscure previous warnings. ] 20:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
			# ]
			# ]
			# ]
			# ]

	Excuse me but the edit war on the article ] has came to an end as a general consensus has been agreed upon and implemented. I'll kindly ask you to refrain from reporting me to Administrators simply as a way to try and get your own back on me because I disagreed with your views in the past. Regards ] 20:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' ]
	===] reported by User:] (Result:)===
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:''' ] and ]
	] violation on
	{{Article\|Foie_gras}}. {{3RRV\|Olivierd}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:''' ]
	* Previous version reverted to:
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
	<!--
			Editor repeatedly restoring unsourced content, making four reverts in just under an hour. - ] (]) 20:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
			:{{AN3\|b\|24 hours}} ] (]) 20:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
	-->

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Indefinitely blocked) ==
	''' Comments:''' Removed the same passage 4x. User has been previously blocked for 3RR, on ], no less. —] 01:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Grail Movement}}

	~~===]~~ reported ~~by User~~:~~Coelacan~~ ~~(Result:)===~~		'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Folawiki}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	] violation on
	{{Article\|Christian_extremist_terrorism}}. {{3RRV\|72.184.244.25}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	* Previous version reverted to:
			# {{diff2\|1265465790\|02:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "The claimed reason provided, "whitewashing", provides nothing concrete to justify such action. What is whitewashing? And what precisely in the edit qualified as such? Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	* 1st revert:
			# {{diff2\|1265465049\|02:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	* 2nd revert:
			# {{diff2\|1265464033\|02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	* 3rd revert:
			# {{diff2\|1265459461\|01:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	* 4th revert:

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
			# {{diff2\|1265461000\|01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]."
			# {{diff2\|1265464521\|02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* December 2024 */ ] notice"
			# {{diff2\|1265464576\|02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Disruptive editing on ]."
			# {{diff2\|1265465123\|02:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	''' Comments:''' Here is the 3RR warning: . Not all of these reverts are exactly the same, but the theme is the removal of religious motivations for these groups and replacing them all with racist motivations. This is probably preparatory work for user's stated intention to have the article deleted: .
			# {{diff2\|1265464764\|02:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "{{re\|Folawiki}} The whitewashing has to stop. ] (]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)"

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	===] reported by User:CJCurrie (Result:)===

			Cult whitewashing. ] (]) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
			*Indefinitely blocked.--] (]) 02:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: ) ==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Trisha Krishnan}}
	] violation on
	{{Article\|Palestine:_Peace_Not_Apartheid}}. {{3RRV\|Lance6968}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|TheHappiestEditor}}
	This one's a bit complicated, so bear with me.

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	* 1st revert:
	** Previous version reverted to:
	* 2nd revert:
	** Previous version reverted to:
	* 3rd revert:
	**Previous version reverted to: Same as 2nd revert
	* 4th revert:
	**This is a partial revert of
	* 5th revert:
	**Previous version partially reverted to:

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	Comment: During the time that Lance made these reverts, a discussion concerning the 3RR was taking place on the talk page. In the course of this discussion, I was wrongly accused of breaking the 3RR, and accused of "gaming the system" (a charge I've also denied). The person who made these complaints was silent about Lance's edits. ] 05:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
			# {{diff2\|1265432813\|22:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) She works in Malayalam cinema.There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha. The total number of Malayalam films is not two."
			# {{diff2\|1265165246\|13:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)}} "/* top */She works in Malayalam films too. There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha."

			*Diffs from other articles (language POV and edit war)
	:CJCurrie's reverts were 49 minutes outside the 3RR "limit" — diffs — which is why I was "silent" about reporting Lance's reverts. It seems a little unfair to report one series of complex, partial reverts and ignore the other for the sake of 49 minutes. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 05:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
			#
			#
			#

			#
	::SlimVirgin is mistaken. I self-reverted one of my prior reverts (the one from 01:00, 23 December 2006), and so did not even come close to violating the 3RR. More generally, I will note that SlimVirgin has spent extensive time criticizing me for my non-violation, and has been silent on Lance's actual violation (here, and on the talk page). Methinks a double standard is being imposed, and I can't help but wonder if the complaints against me constitute a form of harrassment.

			# - putting fake sources/infomation
	::None of this has anything to do with Lance's situation, of course. ] 05:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
			# - putting fake sources/infomation
	:::This is typical of the way you system game, to be honest, and I want to have nothing more to do with it. You had not self-reverted by the time I posted the diffs showing you'd violated 3RR. You were deliberately engaged in making it hard to see what you were doing, because of the reverting, self-reverting, then more reverting. Anyway, as I said, I've had enough. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 05:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
			# - putting fake sources/infomation

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	::::I self-reverted at 2:28, 23 December 2006. You posted the diffs at 9:43, 23 December 2006. So, I can understand why you might not want to discuss this further. Anyway, I'm getting tired of your ''ad hominem'' attacks against me, and your seeming inability to admit having made any mistakes yourself. ] 05:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
			#

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	::Also, I believe it's considered bad form to . ] 05:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

	Looking the history, you didn't self-revert your addition of the tag. All that happened was you later took the tag down because someone had removed the material you didn't like. That's not what's meant by "self-revert," and this is exactly what I mean about system-gaming and rules-lawyering. This is my last comment, I hope. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 05:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	:No, it was still a self-revert. You also left something out: right after I removed the tag, you restored the disputed information '''without''' restoring the tag as well. You also made a series of edits between 07:24 and 08:37, despite having made three reverts a few hours earlier: the very definition of a borderline 3RR violation, unless I'm quite mistaken. Who exactly was system gaming, here? ] 05:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

			POV pushing/cherry-picking "Malayalam" and edit warring in a lot of articles. Apart from the above listed, the user has been pushing "Malayalam" as one of the languages in which "actor XYZ" has acted 'predominantly' in but in actuality the entries are only a few . The editor has received multiple warnings for being disruptiove and a recent one for from {{u\|Krimuk2.0}}. - ] (]) 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
	== --] <sup>]</sup> 06:39, 24 December 2006 (UTC) replies==

			:{{u\|TheHappiestEditor}}, please respond to these allegations. ] (]) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
	I am not interested in ]'s petty edit war. His complaint is childish; and I wish he would leave me be. If necessary, I will self-revert to respect the 3RR rule.--] <sup>]</sup> 06:39, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==
	====Apology====

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Hariprasad Chaurasia}}
	God, what a mess.

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|103.84.130.238}}
	I'd like to apologize to everyone for letting this dispute get out of hand. I realize this isn't the place for it, and I'll endeavour not to let this happen again. ] 06:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	=== Sample violation report to copy ===

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	<pre>
			# {{diff\|oldid=1262480024\|diff=1265542339\|label=Consecutive edits made from 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) to 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}}
			## {{diff2\|1265541681\|12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
			## {{diff2\|1265542339\|12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} ""https://www.hariprasadchaurasia.com" check the site pandit is part of his name , the site is run by him, also there are other similar cases too on wikipedia "
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	===] reported by User:~~~ (Result:)===
			#
	<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter only your username manually -->
			#

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	] violation on
	{{Article\|ARTICLE_NAME}}. {{3RRV\|VIOLATOR_USERNAME}}:
	<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

	* Previous version reverted to:
	<!-- If all the reverts are the same, please just provide the version-reverted-to. For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous-version for each revert. -->
	* 1st revert:
	* 2nd revert:
	* 3rd revert:
	* 4th revert:
	<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up ] if you do not know what a diff is. -->

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	<!--
	- * Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.
	Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly.
	-->

			Keeps on adding (edit wars) honorifics despite explanation about ] and ] in edit summaries and warnings ] (]) 14:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
	''' Comments:''' <!-- Optional -->
			:The IP was initially reported to AIV, since disruptive edits continued after a warning, but was to report it here. - ] (]) 14:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
	</pre>
			*{{AN3\|p}} ] (]) 22:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result:Indefinitely blocked) ==
	Note on completing a 3RR report:

	* Copy the template above, the text within but not including <nowiki><pre>...</pre></nowiki>
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Angelo Rules}}
	* Replace <nowiki>http://DIFFS</nowiki> with a link to the ] and the DIFFTIME with the timestamp

	* We need to know that there are at least four reverts. List them, and replace <nowiki>http://VersionLink</nowiki> with a link to the version that the first revert reverted to. If the reverts are subtle or different, please provide an explanation of why they are all reverts. Even if the reverts are straightforward, it's helpful to point out the words or sentences being reverted.
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Johnny test person}}
	* Warnings are a good idea but not obligatory

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1265621270\|21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
			# {{diff2\|1265402736\|19:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
			# {{diff2\|1265399005\|19:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
			# {{diff2\|1265395466\|18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
			# {{diff2\|1265394604\|18:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''


			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>

			Back from an edit warring block with an additional personal attack (]) ] (]) 21:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
			* {{AN3\|b\| indef}} Two day old account with 19 edits, a block, and that personal attack? Bye. <b>]</b><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 21:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:24, 27 December 2024

Noticeboard for edit warring

v t e Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles and content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts

Update this page

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Click here to create a new report

Noticeboard archives
Administrators' (archives, search)
348	349	350	351	352	353	354	355	356	357
358	359	360	361	362	363	364	365	366	367
Incidents (archives, search)
1156	1157	1158	1159	1160	1161	1162	1163	1164	1165
1166	1167	1168	1169	1170	1171	1172	1173	1174	1175
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
471	472	473	474	475	476	477	478	479	480
481	482	483	484	485	486	487	488	489	490
Arbitration enforcement (archives)
327	328	329	330	331	332	333	334	335	336
337	338	339	340	341	342	343	344	345	346
Other links
Talk Sockpuppet investigations Backlog

User:PaleoFile reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Warned users)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: (regarding another now-dormant edit war on a related page)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not revert and talked directly to editor instead

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Bowler the Carmine | talk 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Both users have been Warned. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:14, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Those users and Mei23448 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) seems continuing edit wars on Monquirasaurus and Sachicasaurus articles.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

In addition, PaleoFile posted personal attack on talk page of Mei23448.

Both users does not provide reliable sources, PaleoFile only proposing X post in edit summaries and cite nothing, while Mei23448 also does not cite anything to change. Both users needs to be blocked. (Jens Lallensack seems only trying to revert vandalism, so is not problematic than those two) Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 14:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
17 tons for Sachicasaurus has been debunked so I changed it and some user cant accept that his favourite animal isnt as big as he wants. Mei23448 (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
If you have a dispute, you may discuss it on the article's talk page. Bowler the Carmine | talk 23:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Also 15 ton for Sachicasaurus is based on the Sachicasaurus reconstruction from Diocles. Mei23448 (talk) 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
@ToBeFree: The problem persists, Mei23448 and User:PaleoFile continue their edit war / vandalism on both pages. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 12:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the notification, Jens Lallensack. Both blocked indefinitely, the latter unlikely to be unblocked any time soon. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Napoleonjosephine2020 reported by User:Kline (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Zilch.

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

Note: I am not involved in this situation whatsoever, just found this in recent changes. Kline • talk • contribs 05:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

The editor whose revisions I am trying to undo publicly attacked the subject as an "opportunistic grifter". No one who uses such inflammatory language should be editing the page of this subject. This is common sense and journalism 101. He is clearly motivated by animus against her and should not be editing her page. Why is this even in question? Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:21, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

@Napoleonjosephine2020

"This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule." Also, "When reporting a user here, own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first." I am not involved, don't complain to me please. Nothing I can do here. Kline • talk • contribs 05:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

You reported me because I tried to stop someone from violating Li's page! Why is the saboteur getting a free pass? He's clearly motivated by animus and admitted as much on her talk page. Napoleonjosephine2020 (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Did you read my comment? You and the other person will have behavior analyzed and decisions will be made accordingly. I'm not singling you out since I have no idea what's happening, you just happened to start the edit war. Kline • talk • contribs 05:28, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Napoleon, I think this is a manifestly unfair characterization of what occurred on my talk page (not yours). Here’s the exchange, for those curious. EncycloDeterminate (talk) 05:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours EvergreenFir (talk) 06:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

User:2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C and User:2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE reported by User:Bowler the Carmine (Result: Page already protected)

Page: Warburg effect (oncology) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2601:40:CE00:1590:24F6:A73A:9F20:74C (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 2601:40:CE00:1590:80BC:3313:5A8D:AACE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

(second IP)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: N/A, did not participate in reverts. Warned first IP on their own talk page

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:
I believe both IPs are the same person. The second IP's first edit is a talk page comment stating I'm not Ravidmurthy, but I am the one who has been doing most of the editing here., and after leaving that and another comment proceeded to make the same reversion (#4 above) as the other IP, a little more than 2 hours after #3. CipherRephic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was also involved in the edit war, but agreed to stop after being warned and has not broken 3RR. Bowler the Carmine | talk 21:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

User:99.98.190.59 reported by User:ZimZalaBim (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

User being reported: 99.98.190.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

18:21, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265024592 by ZimZalaBim (talk)"
16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264902249 by Augmented Seventh (talk)"
03:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264868382 by ZimZalaBim (talk)"
23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1264776552 by Zachomatic (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

18:05, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Marc Benioff."
18:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

18:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC) "/* Early life/ethnic background */ more"

Comments:

Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

User:ChasePlowman2014 reported by User:Happily888 (Result: Blocked 2 weeks)

User being reported: ChasePlowman2014 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

00:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."
00:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

00:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "/* ChasePlowman2014 edit warring */ new section"

Comments:

User continues edit warring and doesn't discuss edits even after having been requested to, not even explaining their reversions in their edit summary. Happily888 (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

ChasePlowman2014 is completely unresponsive. I hope they try editing during the 2 weeks of their block and notice that they have a talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Whilst I cannot dispute ChasePlowman2014's behaviour for edit warring, Happily888 is not completely without fault here. Neither user made any particular effort to engage in discussion over a relatively minor issue, but to expect an immediate response (and then immediately banning said user) on the 25th of December, a day of the year when one can reasonably be expected to be a little busy, is overzealous. I have also left a response to Happily888's message on the Dune: Part Two talk page explaining why ChasePlowman2014 was, arguably, correct to make the initial edit before Happily888 made the first reversion. -- JascaDucato (talk | contributions) 21:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
  Jasca Ducato, this isn't about the time taken to respond to the noticeboard report. ChasePlowman2014 isn't using edit summaries nor talk pages and ignores warnings on their talk page about their behavior. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:36, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Callmehelper reported by User:Srijanx22 (Result: Declined)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:
Frequent edit warring by this user with several editors on an article falling under contentious and general sanctions. Also edit warring on B. R. Ambedkar. Srijanx22 (talk) 06:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

It's me @Callmehelper.

Clarification by my side ;

Firstly I never ever got any Edit Warning before.

Disputes details ;

Firstly , I edit Ambedkar Jayanti check history of that page from here to final version
process of reverting by others and my responses

- 1st Revert My response then again revert and we had a little discussion on my talk page for this disputes see then i thought matter would be solved.
But other editor revert again by saying no need to improvement see and my response of revert here and discussion on his talk page here

Then instead of healthy discussion this guy response me by saying you have problem with ambedkar article as well so first solve there see

Now I want to clarify that this guy totally misused the healthy discussion and try to show like there is editing warning on me about Ambedkar Main article talk here but this matter solve 1 month ago by further discussion on Talk:B. R. Ambedkar#Request_for_Administrator Review_of_Recent_Edits_on_Dr. B.R._Ambedkar's_Page

So here in ambedkar page, there is nothing issue about any dispute about that discussion specifically.

the current discussion on Ambedkar page is going on about my changes that is under WP:UNDUE or not about new fresh topic. check last discussion on talk page ] this discussion is currently going on as there is no response given further by anyone yet.

so there is nothing like editing warning on me regarding Ambedkar page .

Conclusion

So all my point is whenever I edit, i edit with much responsiblity that this should be based on fact and figures with the valuable citations. I gave explanation of everything what i edit with sources and editing summary.

Some editor, i don't know what's want? they don't discuss on facts and sources.

i left a discussion on Ambedkar Jayanti page for further discussion as well but response are so weak in my POV amd also misleading my claim and sources look.

I think, i clarify my side well enough. for further discussioni am on.

I hope Administrator will look up this discussion/dispute from NPOV.

Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 09:56, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined Discussion has started on the talk page. Let's let it play out. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Johnny test person reported by User:Aoidh (Result: Blocked 24h)

Previous version reverted to: Special:Diff/1265377722

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:Diff/1265395592

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User talk:Aoidh#Angelo Rules and Talk:Angelo Rules#Unsourced character biography section

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: Special:Diff/1265406607

Comments:
Editor repeatedly restoring unsourced content, making four reverts in just under an hour. - Aoidh (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Folawiki reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

User being reported: Folawiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

02:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "The claimed reason provided, "whitewashing", provides nothing concrete to justify such action. What is whitewashing? And what precisely in the edit qualified as such? Undid revision 1265465515 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
02:17, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265464633 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
02:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265460975 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"
01:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1240888069 by Tgeorgescu (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

01:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Grail Movement."
02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "/* December 2024 */ WP:FTN notice"
02:14, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing on Grail Movement."
02:18, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Grail Movement."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

02:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "@Folawiki: The whitewashing has to stop. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)"

Comments:

Cult whitewashing. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:31, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

User:TheHappiestEditor reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: )

User being reported: TheHappiestEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

22:35, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265170057 by Fylindfotberserk (talk) She works in Malayalam cinema.There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha. The total number of Malayalam films is not two."
13:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC) "/* top */She works in Malayalam films too. There are two upcoming Malayalam films of Trisha."

Diffs from other articles (language POV and edit war)

- putting fake sources/infomation
- putting fake sources/infomation
- putting fake sources/infomation

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

POV pushing/cherry-picking "Malayalam" and edit warring in a lot of articles. Apart from the above listed, the user has been pushing "Malayalam" as one of the languages in which "actor XYZ" has acted 'predominantly' in but in actuality the entries are only a few . The editor has received multiple warnings for being disruptiove and a recent one for edit-warring from Krimuk2.0. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

TheHappiestEditor, please respond to these allegations. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

User:103.84.130.238 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: Page protected)

User being reported: 103.84.130.238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Consecutive edits made from 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) to 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
1. 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1262480024 by Fylindfotberserk (talk)"
2. 12:12, 27 December 2024 (UTC) ""https://www.hariprasadchaurasia.com" check the site pandit is part of his name , the site is run by him, also there are other similar cases too on wikipedia "

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Keeps on adding (edit wars) honorifics despite explanation about WP:NCIN and MOS:HON in edit summaries and warnings Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

The IP was initially reported to AIV, since disruptive edits continued after a level 4 warning, but was asked to report it here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Johnny test person reported by User:ToBeFree (Result:Indefinitely blocked)

User being reported: Johnny test person (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265440086 by ToBeFree (talk)"
19:31, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265401281 by Codename AD (talk)"
19:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265395978 by Codename AD (talk)"
18:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265395008 by Aoidh (talk)"
18:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1265382744 by Aoidh (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Back from an edit warring block with an additional personal attack (Special:Diff/1265613452) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:04, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely Two day old account with 19 edits, a block, and that personal attack? Bye. Jauerback/_dude. 21:15, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Categories: