| Revision as of 01:42, 25 December 2006 editBetacommandBot (talk | contribs)931,490 editsm adding Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Law Enforcement stub← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:24, 1 December 2024 edit undoHudecEmil (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,847 edits note unnecessary | ||
| (87 intermediate revisions by 66 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Short description|Term used by criminologists and sociologists}} | |||
| The '''dark figure of (or for) crime''' is a term employed by ] and ] to describe the amount of unreported or undiscovered crime, which calls into question the ] of official ]. | |||
| {{for|the South Korean film|Dark Figure of Crime (film)}} | |||
| {{Criminology}} | |||
| In ] and ], the '''dark figure of crime''', '''hidden figure of crime''', or '''latent criminality'''<ref>Ellis H. Crime and Control in the English Speaking Caribbean: A Comparative Study of Jamaica, Trinidad, Tobago and Barbados, 1960-1980 // Crime and Control in Comparative Perspectives, edited by Heiland, Shelley, and Katoh. – 1992. – p. 131-161</ref><ref>Oloruntimehin O. Crime and control in Nigeria // Crime and control in comparative perspectives. – 1992. – p. 163-188.</ref> is the amount of unreported or undiscovered crime.<ref name="walsh">{{cite book | title=Introduction to Criminology: A Text/Reader | publisher=SAGE Publications, Inc. | last1=Walsh | first1=Anthony | last2=Hemmens | first2=Craig | year=2014 | location=Thousand Oaks, CA | isbn=978-1-4522-5820-1 | edition=3rd}}</ref> | |||
| == Methodology == | |||
| ], such as the research associated with the ] (BCS), are recent attempts to provide an insight into the amount of unreported crime. | |||
| This gap between reported and unreported crimes calls the ] of official ] into question, but all measures of crime have a dark figure to some degree. | |||
| Comparisons between official statistics, such as the ] and the ], and ], such as the ] (NCVS), attempt to provide an insight into the amount of unreported crime.<ref name="maxfield">{{cite journal | title=Comparing Self-Reports and Official Records of Arrests | journal=Journal of Quantitative Criminology | year=2000 | volume=16 | issue=1 | pages=87–110 | last1=Maxfield | first1=Michael G. | last2=Weiler | first2=Barbara Luntz | last3=Widom | first3=Cathy Spatz | doi=10.1023/a:1007577512038| s2cid=140785017 }}</ref><ref name="biderman">{{cite book | title=Understanding Crime Incidence Statistics: Why the UCR Diverges from the NCS | publisher=Springer | year=1991 | location=New York, NY | last1=Biderman | first1=Albert D. | last2=Lynch | first2=James P. | last3=Peterson | first3=James L.}}</ref> | |||
| == Unrecorded and unreported crime == | |||
| Not all the crimes that take place are reported to, or recorded by, the police. Given this, sociologists refer to the gap between the official level of crime and the amount of crime in the community as the ‘dark figure’ for crime. For a crime to be recorded at least three things must happen: | |||
| ] are also used in comparison with official statistics and organized datasets to assess the dark of crime.<ref name="walsh" /> | |||
| * Somebody must be aware that a crime has taken place. | |||
| ==By type== | |||
| * That crime must be reported. | |||
| {{Further|Under-reporting#Crime}} | |||
| The gap in official statistics is largest for less serious crimes.<ref name="walsh" /> | |||
| ] from victim surveys differ from sexual violence ] reported by ].<ref name="l869">{{cite journal | last1=Ingemann-Hansen | first1=Ole | last2=Sabroe | first2=Svend | last3=Brink | first3=Ole | last4=Knudsen | first4=Maiken | last5=Charles | first5=Annie Vesterbye | title=Characteristics of victims and assaults of sexual violence – Improving inquiries and prevention | journal=Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine | volume=16 | issue=4 | date=2009 | doi=10.1016/j.jflm.2008.07.004 | pages=182–188| pmid=19329073 }}</ref> | |||
| * The police or other agency must accept that a law has been broken. | |||
| == See also == | |||
| It is now widely accepted by social researchers that official crime statistics have significant limitations. These include: | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| == References == | |||
| 1. Some crimes are not reported to the police because | |||
| {{reflist}} | |||
| * The general public regards them as too trivial | |||
| * The victim finds the matter embarrassing | |||
| * Individuals are unaware they are victims (e.g. fraud or confidence tricks) | |||
| * Lack of confidence or trust in the police | |||
| * A fear of reprisals or victimisation | |||
| * The victim may take law into own hands - a form of rough justice | |||
| * Children who may not understand issues | |||
| * Victim may not want to harm the offender (e.g. domestic violence and abuse) | |||
| 2. Some crimes are much more likely to be reported and recorded than others | |||
| * Where insurance claims for cars or household goods are involved | |||
| * Serious crimes are more likely to be reported than trivial offences | |||
| * Media campaigns or the reporting of high profile cases can lead to ‘moral panics’ and sensitize the general public to the existence of crime and thus reporting behaviour. This is known as ‘deviance amplification’ | |||
| 3. Police discretion can influence reporting and recording | |||
| * Different police forces employ different categories and paperwork | |||
| * There are campaigns that lead to crack downs on certain crimes or offences, such as drunk driving at Christmas | |||
| * Some forces will pay less attention to certain types of offence, such as the decision by the Met to liberalize the policing of soft drugs in Brixton in 2002 | |||
| * Stereotyping can influence the pattern of stop and search behaviour by the police | |||
| * A shift from informal or community policing to stricter, military style policing and zero tolerance campaigns, or vice versa, will influence crime rates | |||
| 4. Changes in legislation, technologies and police manpower can influence the crime figures | |||
| * Some existing offences may be decriminalised or downgraded (e.g. homosexuality, abortion, some drug offences) | |||
| * New offences may be created (e.g. cyber crime, not wearing seatbelts, driving whilst using a mobile phone) | |||
| * The wider availability of telephones, alarm technologies, private security staff and close circuit cameras can make it easier to report offences and incidents | |||
| * The number of police officers per head has doubled in the UK since 1861. Furthermore, the police now employ civilians to deal with routine back office tasks that have freed up uniformed officers and other professional for other tasks | |||
| 5. Social and economic changes can influence the volume of official crime recorded | |||
| * There are now more high value consumer goods, such as domestic electronics or cars, to steal than in the past | |||
| * Wider coverage for insurance has increased the incentives to report crimes | |||
| * Changes in the age distribution of the population can influence the crime rate. Fewer young people can lead to a reduction in deviance and delinquency | |||
| * The decline in close knit communities and greater population mobility can reduce informal social control and influence the crime rate | |||
| * Changing norms and values can influence the crime rate. For example, members of the public are now less tolerant of child abuse or domestic violence than in the past. | |||
| Sociologists and criminologists recognize these limitations of official crime statistics and have endeavoured to find alternative measures of criminality. These can broadly be divided into victimization and self report studies. For example, some crimes, such as tax evasion, do not have an obvious victim, and it is these that are least likely to be reported. However, attempts have been made to estimate the amount of crime which victims are aware of but which is not reported to the police or not recorded as a crime by them. | |||
| == Further reading == | == Further reading == | ||
| * Moore, S. (1996). ''Investigating Crime and Deviance''. Harpers Collins. {{ISBN|0-00-322439-2}}, pages 211–220. | |||
| Andy Pilkington (1995) Measuring Crime, Sociology Review, November 1995, pages 15-18. | |||
| * Coleman, C., & Moynihan, J. (1996). ''Understanding crime data: haunted by the dark figure''. Open University Press. {{ISBN|0-335-19519-9}}. | |||
| Stephen Moore (1996)Investigating Crime and Deviance, Harpers Collins Publishers Ltd 1996, pages 211 - 220 | |||
| == See also == | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| == External links == | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| {{crime-stub}} | |||
| {{law-enforcement-stub}} | {{law-enforcement-stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:24, 1 December 2024
Term used by criminologists and sociologists For the South Korean film, see Dark Figure of Crime (film).| Criminology |
|---|
.svg) |
| Main Theories |
| Methods |
| Subfields and other major theories |
| Browse |
In criminology and sociology, the dark figure of crime, hidden figure of crime, or latent criminality is the amount of unreported or undiscovered crime.
Methodology
This gap between reported and unreported crimes calls the reliability of official crime statistics into question, but all measures of crime have a dark figure to some degree.
Comparisons between official statistics, such as the Uniform Crime Reports and the National Incident-Based Reporting System, and victim studies, such as the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), attempt to provide an insight into the amount of unreported crime.
Self-report studies are also used in comparison with official statistics and organized datasets to assess the dark of crime.
By type
Further information: Under-reporting § CrimeThe gap in official statistics is largest for less serious crimes.
Estimates of sexual violence from victim surveys differ from sexual violence crime statistics reported by law enforcement.
See also
References
- Ellis H. Crime and Control in the English Speaking Caribbean: A Comparative Study of Jamaica, Trinidad, Tobago and Barbados, 1960-1980 // Crime and Control in Comparative Perspectives, edited by Heiland, Shelley, and Katoh. – 1992. – p. 131-161
- Oloruntimehin O. Crime and control in Nigeria // Crime and control in comparative perspectives. – 1992. – p. 163-188.
- ^ Walsh, Anthony; Hemmens, Craig (2014). Introduction to Criminology: A Text/Reader (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. ISBN 978-1-4522-5820-1.
- Maxfield, Michael G.; Weiler, Barbara Luntz; Widom, Cathy Spatz (2000). "Comparing Self-Reports and Official Records of Arrests". Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 16 (1): 87–110. doi:10.1023/a:1007577512038. S2CID 140785017.
- Biderman, Albert D.; Lynch, James P.; Peterson, James L. (1991). Understanding Crime Incidence Statistics: Why the UCR Diverges from the NCS. New York, NY: Springer.
- Ingemann-Hansen, Ole; Sabroe, Svend; Brink, Ole; Knudsen, Maiken; Charles, Annie Vesterbye (2009). "Characteristics of victims and assaults of sexual violence – Improving inquiries and prevention". Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 16 (4): 182–188. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2008.07.004. PMID 19329073.
Further reading
- Moore, S. (1996). Investigating Crime and Deviance. Harpers Collins. ISBN 0-00-322439-2, pages 211–220.
- Coleman, C., & Moynihan, J. (1996). Understanding crime data: haunted by the dark figure. Open University Press. ISBN 0-335-19519-9.
 | This law enforcement–related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |