Misplaced Pages

:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 December 22: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Categories for deletion | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:49, 26 December 2006 editDaakshayani (talk | contribs)13 edits →Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan: important message← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:48, 10 October 2022 edit undoSheep8144402 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers33,719 editsm fix linter errors (37x obsolete font tags) 
(28 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{| width = "100%" {| width = "100%"
|- |-
! width="50%" align="left" | <font color="grey">&lt;</font> ] ! width="50%" align="left" | <span style="color:grey;">&lt;</span> ]
! width="50%" align="right" | ] <font color="grey">&gt;</font> ! width="50%" align="right" | ] <span style="color:grey;">&gt;</span>
|} |}
</div></noinclude> </div></noinclude>
Line 15: Line 15:


==== Category:Brazilian cities ==== ==== Category:Brazilian cities ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''merge'''. ] 00:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:] into ] :] into ]
*'''Merge''', misguided naming. ] 22:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Merge''', misguided naming. ] 22:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:Commands of the United States Air Force ==== ==== Category:Commands of the United States Air Force ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''rename'''. ] 00:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:] to ] :] to ]
*'''Rename''', disambiguation AND follow naming conventions of ]. ] 18:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Rename''', disambiguation AND follow naming conventions of ]. ] 18:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== ] ==== ==== ] ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''delete'''. ] 00:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

fails ].--] 17:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC) fails ].--] 17:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' please tag the category using <nowiki> {{subst:Cfd}} </nowiki> if you are serious about this nomination. ] 09:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment''' please tag the category using <nowiki> {{subst:Cfd}} </nowiki> if you are serious about this nomination. ] 09:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
**Done. ] 12:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC) **Done. ] 12:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - ] 12:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - ] 12:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Trivia. ] 17:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' A list does a better job. ] 21:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:Gaijin tarento ==== ==== Category:Gaijin tarento ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''keep'''. ] 00:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:{{lc|Gaijin tarento}}<br/> :{{lc|Gaijin tarento}}<br/>
'''Delete''', Japanese-POV category. ] 16:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC) '''Delete''', Japanese-POV category. ] 16:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' what's japanese-POV in a japanese pop culture category? ] 02:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' what's japanese-POV in a japanese pop culture category? ] 02:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The reason given for deletion is lacking in merit. ] 22:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


====]==== ====]====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''merge'''. ] 00:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:'''''Merge''' into ], landforms are by country, people are by nationality.'' -- <i>] <sup>]</sup></i> 13:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC) :'''''Merge''' into ], landforms are by country, people are by nationality.'' -- <i>] <sup>]</sup></i> 13:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' per nom ] 16:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Merge''' per nom ] 16:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan ==== ==== Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''keep'''. ] 00:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:{{lc|Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan}}<br/> :{{lc|Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan}}<br/>
:{{lc|Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan}}<br/> :{{lc|Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan}}<br/>
Line 44: Line 76:
:::Has a CheckUser been performed? A category like this shouldn't be created until the information is confirmed. &mdash;] (] <small>•</small> ]) 19:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC) :::Has a CheckUser been performed? A category like this shouldn't be created until the information is confirmed. &mdash;] (] <small>•</small> ]) 19:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
::::Sockpuppets need not be confirmed solely via Checkuser (If it was, why would we have ]?), most actually aren't. And "Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets" are by definition not confirmed, but have very strong suspicion against themselves. ] 02:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC) ::::Sockpuppets need not be confirmed solely via Checkuser (If it was, why would we have ]?), most actually aren't. And "Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets" are by definition not confirmed, but have very strong suspicion against themselves. ] 02:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
:::::Malber, Malber, Malber. I feel that many of the checkusers seem to trust me. Is this nomination made in good faith? Or is this just plain ]? Regards, &mdash; ] 08:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC) :::::Malber, Malber, Malber. I feel that many of the checkusers seem to trust me. Is this nomination made in good faith? Or is this just plain ]? Regards, &mdash; ] 08:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
::And, yes, many (perhaps all) of these were confirmed by me using CheckUser. I have no idea what this nomination is about. ]·] 10:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC) ::And, yes, many (perhaps all) of these were confirmed by me using CheckUser. I have no idea what this nomination is about. ]·] 10:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
:::Many? ''Perhaps'' all? If this and the evidence is posted on the category pages, I'll gladly retract this CfD. &mdash;] (] <small>•</small> ]) 04:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC) :::Many? ''Perhaps'' all? If this and the evidence is posted on the category pages, I'll gladly retract this CfD. &mdash;] (] <small>•</small> ]) 04:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


:'''Strong Keep''' - I'm smelling something, the odor of ] . <b>]]</b> 20:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC) :'''Strong Keep''' - I'm smelling something, the odor of ] . <b>]]</b> 20:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
:* Agreed, perhaps I may even say this should be a '''speedy keep'''. - ] 13:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC) :* Agreed, perhaps I may even say this should be a '''speedy keep'''. - ] 13:34, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>
::*I am Dakshayanai again. Came back to tell this to people who believe wikipedia is a wonderful place. I know that Dmcdevit is lying; in my own case atleast. I was blocked as a sockpuppet of Kuntan. There was no checkuser evidence against me. There was no history of abuse, trolling or being part of meatpuppetry in any consensus building process. I was blocked just because an administrator, and only one administrator, suspected that I am a sock puppet of a blocked user. This administrator,later almost that he was wrong. Still he has not even responded to my request to , but only protected my talk page to hide criticism. Criticising an administrator is immediately branded as trolling or disruption and such are deleted. I have owned up all the socks that I used (the only option left for me) to highlight this and now they are also branded as socks of kuntan while there is no evidence to prove I am a sockpuppet of kuntan. Dmcdevit is part of this conspiracy and his response "many (perhaps all)" reveals this. You cannot prove he is lying because he has not revealed any checkuser results. Misplaced Pages privacy policy allows checkuser, but this checkuser is abusing it by not being transparent. Nearly Headless Nick is trying to himself as a brave warrior engaged in the war on terror ( and so he can brand everyone criticizing him as a sock puppet of kuntan) and seeing his joy in being attacked by vandals, and also posting like I will not be surprised to know that he was being helped by some users just to thwart this AFD and ( without any evidence) all who oppose him. I had criticized Dmcdevit earlier ,,for this abuse. In that case it later turned out that he was wrong and one genuine user, whom he branded as , after fishing an AFD, was later unblocked. I now know why I was target of this Kuntan hunting.] 10:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)


==== Category:13th century in the United Kingdom ==== ==== Category:13th century in the United Kingdom ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;"> <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.'' :''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''speedy delete''' per creator request. '''''×'''''] 06:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC) The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''speedy delete''' per creator request. '''''×'''''] 06:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


Line 60: Line 92:
*'''Delete''' Created in error - there was no UK in the 13th century. <b>] | <sup><i>]</i></sup></b> 11:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Created in error - there was no UK in the 13th century. <b>] | <sup><i>]</i></sup></b> 11:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Mistake. ] 17:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Mistake. ] 17:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div> :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:14th century in the United Kingdom ==== ==== Category:14th century in the United Kingdom ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;"> <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.'' :''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''speedy delete''' per creator request. '''''×'''''] 06:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC) The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''speedy delete''' per creator request. '''''×'''''] 06:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


Line 70: Line 102:
*'''Delete''' Created in error - there was no UK in the 14th century. <b>] | <sup><i>]</i></sup></b> 11:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Created in error - there was no UK in the 14th century. <b>] | <sup><i>]</i></sup></b> 11:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Mistake. ] 17:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Mistake. ] 17:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color=red>'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div> :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:Global cities ==== ==== Category:Global cities ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''delete and mark as deleted'''. ] 00:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:{{lc|Global cities}}<br/> :{{lc|Global cities}}<br/>
'''Delete''', as PoV and encouraging promotion. "Global city" suggests a theory (and thus PoV) at best, mere hype at worst. The article on ] starts off with impenetrable jargon and goes on to say that '''''It has been argued''' that global cities are those sharing the following characteristics'' (emphasis added); no source for this argument is given. There's a scorechart below for putative global cities, but this is one group's opinion (and it seems to be completely preoccupied by ''corporate'' globalism). This is followed by various other tables, all of which present opinions rather than a consensus. I see no clear understanding of the term, and no reason for this category (which I think will be inflated by civic boosterism). -- ] 08:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC) '''Delete''', as PoV and encouraging promotion. "Global city" suggests a theory (and thus PoV) at best, mere hype at worst. The article on ] starts off with impenetrable jargon and goes on to say that '''''It has been argued''' that global cities are those sharing the following characteristics'' (emphasis added); no source for this argument is given. There's a scorechart below for putative global cities, but this is one group's opinion (and it seems to be completely preoccupied by ''corporate'' globalism). This is followed by various other tables, all of which present opinions rather than a consensus. I see no clear understanding of the term, and no reason for this category (which I think will be inflated by civic boosterism). -- ] 08:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)


*'''Comment''' - While there is a list at ], I don't necessarily think that that means that a category shouldn't exist in this case. Interested in further discussion. - ] 09:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment''' - While there is a list at ], I don't necessarily think that that means that a category shouldn't exist in this case. Interested in further discussion. - ] 09:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', use a list instead. ] 14:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', use a list instead. ] 14:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' latest incarnation; see related discussion at ], ], ], ], ], ], and related ] and ], and going all the way back to ]. -] 16:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' latest incarnation; see related discussion at ], ], ], ], ], ], and related ] and ], and going all the way back to ]. -] 16:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per all previous discussions and '''mark as a deleted category.''' ] 17:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per all previous discussions and '''mark as a deleted category.''' ] 17:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 85: Line 121:
**That just introduces the problem of defining "city" as there are many different definitions in use around the world. In any case, the point of the "global city" concept is that there is a lot more to measuring a city's influence than raw population. ] 17:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC) **That just introduces the problem of defining "city" as there are many different definitions in use around the world. In any case, the point of the "global city" concept is that there is a lot more to measuring a city's influence than raw population. ] 17:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' as multiple recreation. ] 17:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Speedy delete''' as multiple recreation. ] 17:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. The whole concept is questionable and thus not fit for a category. ] 17:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' and '''block''' per all previous pro-deletion discussions and comments. ] 21:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


====], ], ]==== ====], ], ]====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
⚫ Duplicates of better-named ], ], and ] respectively. - '''merge/delete'''. Note too that several of the other subcategories of ] incorrectly use a hyphen and should be renamed (I haven't officially nominated them here, or templated them for renaming, but if anyone feels like it...). ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 08:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''merge'''. ] 00:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


⚫ Duplicates of better-named ], ], and ] respectively. - '''merge/delete'''. Note too that several of the other subcategories of ] incorrectly use a hyphen and should be renamed (I haven't officially nominated them here, or templated them for renaming, but if anyone feels like it...). ]...'']'' 08:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
⚫ :Delete per nom. Hyphen's should not be used.<b>]]</b> 19:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

⚫ :Delete per nom. Hyphen's should not be used.<b>]]</b> 19:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:United Methodist bishops by Episcopal Area ==== ==== Category:United Methodist bishops by Episcopal Area ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''delete'''. ] 00:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:{{lc|United Methodist bishops by Episcopal Area}}<br/> :{{lc|United Methodist bishops by Episcopal Area}}<br/>
Container category for a group of sub-categories which have already been agreed for deletion at CFD (see ]. Note that there already exists a ], which (when populated) will divide UM bishops into five groups reflecting the organisational structure of the ]: according to {{cl|United Methodist bishops by Jurisdiction}}, each "jurisdiction" contains a number of episcopal areas. ] <sup>] • (])</sup> 07:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Container category for a group of sub-categories which have already been agreed for deletion at CFD (see ]. Note that there already exists a ], which (when populated) will divide UM bishops into five groups reflecting the organisational structure of the ]: according to {{cl|United Methodist bishops by Jurisdiction}}, each "jurisdiction" contains a number of episcopal areas. ] <sup>] • (])</sup> 07:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 99: Line 148:
*'''Delete''' per BrownHairedGirl and Dr. Submillimeter. &mdash;&nbsp;] ] &mdash; 20:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per BrownHairedGirl and Dr. Submillimeter. &mdash;&nbsp;] ] &mdash; 20:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', the current orginazation is unworkable. -- <i>] <sup>]</sup></i> 14:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''', the current orginazation is unworkable. -- <i>] <sup>]</sup></i> 14:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== American football logos ==== ==== American football logos ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''rename'''. ] 00:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

*] to ] *] to ]
*] to ] *] to ]
Line 107: Line 161:


Please expand the abbreviations per ]. ] ] 07:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Please expand the abbreviations per ]. ] ] 07:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Rename''' per nom. ] 21:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== LGBT categories ==== ==== LGBT categories ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''rename all''' (with amendment to occupation category name). ] <span style="font-size:90%;">]</span> 12:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

*] to ] *] to ]
*] to ] *] to ]
Line 117: Line 177:


*'''Comment''' - Has '''LGBT''' gained the same consensual usage in category naming comvention as '''US''', '''UK''', or '''NATO''' has? Essentially, if the answer is ''yes'', then the first three could be speedied. If the answer is ''no'', then this nomination should be opposed. - ] 09:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment''' - Has '''LGBT''' gained the same consensual usage in category naming comvention as '''US''', '''UK''', or '''NATO''' has? Essentially, if the answer is ''yes'', then the first three could be speedied. If the answer is ''no'', then this nomination should be opposed. - ] 09:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
**To the best of my knowledge, it does on Misplaced Pages but does not just about anywhere else. ] 14:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC) **To the best of my knowledge, it does on Misplaced Pages but does not just about anywhere else. ] 14:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Rename''', the article in question is at ]. ] 14:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Rename''', the article in question is at ]. ] 14:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Rename''' LGBT is standard form in equalities work in the UK (personal experience speaking here - aware of limitation in Misplaced Pages terms of personal exp.). ] 23:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Rename''' LGBT is standard form in equalities work in the UK (personal experience speaking here - aware of limitation in Misplaced Pages terms of personal exp.). ] 23:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment''', it should be "by nationality".~<b><font color="purple">]</font></b><sup>]</sup> 02:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment''', it should be "by nationality".~]<sup>]</sup> 02:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Rename all''' per nom. ] 04:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Rename all''' per nom. ] 04:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Rename''' the occupation one, and the nationality one with "by"; no opinion on "LGBT people"; '''weak oppose''' the Christians one (unless this is the result of a discussion somewhere and all the Christians subcategories are being changed). LGBT is standard in the US, not sure about Misplaced Pages policy. --] 06:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Rename''' the occupation one, and the nationality one with "by"; no opinion on "LGBT people"; '''weak oppose''' the Christians one (unless this is the result of a discussion somewhere and all the Christians subcategories are being changed). LGBT is standard in the US, not sure about Misplaced Pages policy. --] 06:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
* '''Rename''' all, though "by nationality". FYI, GLBT is used often in the US, but ] has pretty much adopted LGBT. -- ]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] | ])</span> 06:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC) * '''Rename''' all, though "by nationality". FYI, GLBT is used often in the US, but ] has pretty much adopted LGBT. -- ]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] | ])</span> 06:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:Batman love interests ==== ==== Category:Batman love interests ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''delete, with listification in view of some comments'''. ] 00:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
List now created at ]. ] 12:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:] :]
'''Delete'''. Redundant with ]. -] 05:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC) '''Delete'''. Redundant with ]. -] 05:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 132: Line 198:
*'''Delete''' ludicrous. ] 23:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' ludicrous. ] 23:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' List material, at best. — ] 03:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' List material, at best. — ] 03:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No Robin? :o~<b><font color="purple">]</font></b><sup>]</sup> 14:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. No Robin? :o~]<sup>]</sup> 14:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Narrows the list down, plus the article where it was listified got deleted. ] 10:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Keep''' Narrows the list down, plus the article where it was listified got deleted. ] 10:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:Music videos containing movie scenes ==== ==== Category:Music videos containing movie scenes ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''delete'''. ] 00:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:{{lc|Music videos containing movie scenes}}<br/> :{{lc|Music videos containing movie scenes}}<br/>
'''Delete'''. Not very useful as a category, since categorization provides no context (there are many music videos containing film scenes due to being in the soundtrack, but others use them for artistic purposes); also, many song articles fail to directly deal with the music video. Ideally I'd say listify, except there's hardly anything to work with. ] 05:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC) '''Delete'''. Not very useful as a category, since categorization provides no context (there are many music videos containing film scenes due to being in the soundtrack, but others use them for artistic purposes); also, many song articles fail to directly deal with the music video. Ideally I'd say listify, except there's hardly anything to work with. ] 05:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)


*'''Delete''' - While I think I understand the intention, I have to agree with the nominator that the inclusionary criteria is too vague in this case, and could use the descriptiveness of a list, explaining each video and the "movie scenes" therein. - ] 09:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - While I think I understand the intention, I have to agree with the nominator that the inclusionary criteria is too vague in this case, and could use the descriptiveness of a list, explaining each video and the "movie scenes" therein. - ] 09:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


==== Category:Baghdadis ==== ==== Category:Baghdadis ====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''rename''' per nom (via {{tl|categoryredirect}}). ] <span style="font-size:90%;">]</span> 12:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

:] to ] :] to ]
*'''Rename''', to fit with the other categories about where people are from. For example, ] is the correct category; ] points there with a {{tl|Category redirect}}. ] 00:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Rename''', to fit with the other categories about where people are from. For example, ] is the correct category; ] points there with a {{tl|Category redirect}}. ] 00:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Line 147: Line 223:
*'''Rename''' per nom. Never heard the term "Baghdadis" - looks awkward. But even if extant, rename per normal style. ] 05:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Rename''' per nom. Never heard the term "Baghdadis" - looks awkward. But even if extant, rename per normal style. ] 05:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*:Yes, it is a legitimate demonym. It's just not proper for a category name. ] 22:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *:Yes, it is a legitimate demonym. It's just not proper for a category name. ] 22:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*'''Rename''' - ], etc.<b>]]</b> 20:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Rename''' - ], etc.<b>]]</b> 20:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*:I believe you mean ]. ] 20:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC) *:I believe you mean ]. ] 20:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>


====Category:Magnet schools in Ottawa==== ====Category:Magnet schools in Ottawa====
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background:#bff9fc; margin:0 auto; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''
The result of the debate was {{{1|}}} '''delete'''. ] 00:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

] ]
*'''Delete''' - unknown what +cat means - only one school in +cat - ] already has several school +cats, no more are required. ] 05:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - unknown what +cat means - only one school in +cat - ] already has several school +cats, no more are required. ] 05:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.''</div>

Latest revision as of 22:48, 10 October 2022

< December 21 December 23 >

December 22

Category:Brazilian cities

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was merge. Timrollpickering 00:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Brazilian cities into Category:Cities in Brazil
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Commands of the United States Air Force

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename. Timrollpickering 00:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Commands of the United States Air Force to Category:Major commands of the United States Air Force
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Long words

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 00:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

fails WP:OC.--WikiPonny 17:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gaijin tarento

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Timrollpickering 00:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Gaijin tarento (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete, Japanese-POV category. TxPv 16:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Religious leaders by country

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was merge. Timrollpickering 00:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Merge into Category:Religious leaders by nationality, landforms are by country, people are by nationality. -- ProveIt 13:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Timrollpickering 00:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of Kuntan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

List appears to have been compiled by an administrator who hasn't verified this information with CheckUser. —Malber (talk • contribs) 13:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep. This nomination by Malber is borderline bad-faith. He hasn't made any attempt to talk to Sir Nick or to investigate the matter. Kuntan has a long history of disruption. This can be vouched for by other administrators like Deepujoseph. I would suggest a speedy keep and a warning to Malber to not engage in such activities again. - Aksi_great (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Has a CheckUser been performed? A category like this shouldn't be created until the information is confirmed. —Malber (talk • contribs) 19:54, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppets need not be confirmed solely via Checkuser (If it was, why would we have Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets?), most actually aren't. And "Suspected Misplaced Pages sockpuppets" are by definition not confirmed, but have very strong suspicion against themselves. Circeus 02:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Malber, Malber, Malber. I feel that many of the checkusers seem to trust me. Is this nomination made in good faith? Or is this just plain disruption? Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick 08:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
And, yes, many (perhaps all) of these were confirmed by me using CheckUser. I have no idea what this nomination is about. Dmcdevit·t 10:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Many? Perhaps all? If this and the evidence is posted on the category pages, I'll gladly retract this CfD. —Malber (talk • contribs) 04:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Strong Keep - I'm smelling something, the odor of WP:POINT . Bakaman 20:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:13th century in the United Kingdom

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete per creator request. ×Meegs 06:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:13th century in the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:14th century in the United Kingdom

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was speedy delete per creator request. ×Meegs 06:32, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:14th century in the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Global cities

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete and mark as deleted. Timrollpickering 00:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Global cities (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete, as PoV and encouraging promotion. "Global city" suggests a theory (and thus PoV) at best, mere hype at worst. The article on global city starts off with impenetrable jargon and goes on to say that It has been argued that global cities are those sharing the following characteristics (emphasis added); no source for this argument is given. There's a scorechart below for putative global cities, but this is one group's opinion (and it seems to be completely preoccupied by corporate globalism). This is followed by various other tables, all of which present opinions rather than a consensus. I see no clear understanding of the term, and no reason for this category (which I think will be inflated by civic boosterism). -- Hoary 08:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Indian-New Zealanders, Category:Samoan-New Zealanders, Category:Welsh-New Zealanders

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was merge. Timrollpickering 00:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Duplicates of better-named Category:Indian New Zealanders, Category:Samoan New Zealanders, and Category: Welsh New Zealanders respectively. - merge/delete. Note too that several of the other subcategories of Category:New Zealand people by ethnic or national origin incorrectly use a hyphen and should be renamed (I haven't officially nominated them here, or templated them for renaming, but if anyone feels like it...). Grutness...wha? 08:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Hyphen's should not be used.Bakaman 19:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United Methodist bishops by Episcopal Area

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 00:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:United Methodist bishops by Episcopal Area (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Container category for a group of sub-categories which have already been agreed for deletion at CFD (see CFD Dec 12, (UM Bishops by US State). Note that there already exists a Category:United Methodist bishops by Jurisdiction, which (when populated) will divide UM bishops into five groups reflecting the organisational structure of the United Methodist Church: according to Category:United Methodist bishops by Jurisdiction, each "jurisdiction" contains a number of episcopal areas. BrownHairedGirl 07:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, clarifying intention as nominator. --BrownHairedGirl 07:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep In fact, this category organized these Bishops differently than Category:United Methodist bishops by Jurisdiction does. Episcopal Areas exist throughout the World. There are only five U.M.C. Jurisdictions in the World, ALL of them in the U.S.A. So that will be inadequate. The subcats already agreed for deletion were only those which further categorized Bishops by U.S. State. Not all Area categories were nominated or agreed for deletion, because not all of them could be subcatergorized by U.S. State. While I can understand deleting the State categories, these Area categories are an essential and official part of the organization of the U.M. Church throughout the World, and should preperly be kept (just like Catholic or Anglican dioceses categories). The Jurisdictional categories themselves will be pointless without the Area ones. Thank you! Pastorwayne 18:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - Previous CFD arguments have clearly stated that organization of bishops by episcopal area is not practical. The parent category is also not needed. Dr. Submillimeter 13:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per BrownHairedGirl and Dr. Submillimeter. — coelacan talk — 20:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, the current orginazation is unworkable. -- ProveIt 14:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

American football logos

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename. Timrollpickering 00:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Please expand the abbreviations per WP:NCCAT#General naming conventions. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

LGBT categories

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename all (with amendment to occupation category name). David Kernow (talk) 12:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

rename as Category:LGBT and Category:Christian people.--Tsdo 06:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Batman love interests

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete, with listification in view of some comments. Timrollpickering 00:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC) List now created at List of Batman love interests. Timrollpickering 12:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Batman love interests

Delete. Redundant with Category:Batman supporting characters. -Sean Curtin 05:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Music videos containing movie scenes

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 00:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Music videos containing movie scenes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete. Not very useful as a category, since categorization provides no context (there are many music videos containing film scenes due to being in the soundtrack, but others use them for artistic purposes); also, many song articles fail to directly deal with the music video. Ideally I'd say listify, except there's hardly anything to work with. Unint 05:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - While I think I understand the intention, I have to agree with the nominator that the inclusionary criteria is too vague in this case, and could use the descriptiveness of a list, explaining each video and the "movie scenes" therein. - jc37 09:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Baghdadis

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename per nom (via {{categoryredirect}}). David Kernow (talk) 12:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Baghdadis to Category:People from Baghdad
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Magnet schools in Ottawa

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Timrollpickering 00:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Magnet schools in Ottawa

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.