Misplaced Pages

Talk:Anti-competitive practices: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:48, 6 July 2020 editRtutia (talk | contribs)1 edit WikiProject banner shell← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:46, 19 August 2024 edit undoAwesome Aasim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,558 editsNo edit summary 
(12 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{merged-from|Unfair competition|21 August 2020}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Business|class=Start|importance=High}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|
1=
{{WikiProject Law|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Economics|importance = High}}
{{WikiProject Business|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject Law|importance=Mid}}
}} }}
{{American English}}

== Price discrimination is not anti-competititve ==

I'm removing the section on price discrimination, because it is demonstrably not anti-competitive - in that it does not and cannot reduce competition in a space. Here's a source to that effect: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1134 ] (]) 19:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


==Lack of sources== ==Lack of sources==
Line 19: Line 27:


Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 14:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 14:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

== Second half of this article completely lacks citations ==

From about the 3rd paragraph of "Effects" right down to the end of the article, there are no citations.
The last two sections in particular, (Section 4 "Anti-competitive practices in different market systems" and Section
5 "The effectiveness of Anti-competitive practices in national stabilization") contain highly dubious statements with nothing to back them up. ] (]) 14:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Gobbledygook ] (]) 06:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Gobbledygook. Some sentences are incoherent and incomprehensible. Examples: “A chain of monopolists under can cause prices …”; “… to disadvantage competing firms and consumers”; “Based on the research from Long in 2018, it observed that, the Anti-competitive is not only an industry regulation behavior, but also a modern industry characteristics for stakeholders to compete in within an fair market system.” ] (]) 06:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

== Non-compete clauses ==
This article does not mention ]s. Are these clauses usually anti-competitive? ] (]) 21:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:46, 19 August 2024

The contents of the Unfair competition page were merged into Anti-competitive practices on 21 August 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconEconomics High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBusiness High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLaw Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Price discrimination is not anti-competititve

I'm removing the section on price discrimination, because it is demonstrably not anti-competitive - in that it does not and cannot reduce competition in a space. Here's a source to that effect: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1134 Fresheneesz (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Lack of sources

This article currently is not properly sourced but it is formatted much like a list, and the items on this page are often sourced as anti-competitive practices. This is a useful article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-competitive practices. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Second half of this article completely lacks citations

From about the 3rd paragraph of "Effects" right down to the end of the article, there are no citations. The last two sections in particular, (Section 4 "Anti-competitive practices in different market systems" and Section 5 "The effectiveness of Anti-competitive practices in national stabilization") contain highly dubious statements with nothing to back them up. ENSOsurfer (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Gobbledygook Banderswipe (talk) 06:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Gobbledygook. Some sentences are incoherent and incomprehensible. Examples: “A chain of monopolists under can cause prices …”; “… to disadvantage competing firms and consumers”; “Based on the research from Long in 2018, it observed that, the Anti-competitive is not only an industry regulation behavior, but also a modern industry characteristics for stakeholders to compete in within an fair market system.” Banderswipe (talk) 06:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Non-compete clauses

This article does not mention non-compete clauses. Are these clauses usually anti-competitive? Jarble (talk) 21:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Categories: