Revision as of 10:25, 27 December 2006 editSamir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators14,174 edits →WP:RFC/NAME - Kuntan← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:04, 19 November 2024 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,136,056 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
(862 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<!--placeholder, top of page--> | |||
<center><small>no barnstars please</small></center> | |||
<!--I'm not that hot on e-mail so if you need me, best to leave a message here--> | |||
<b><div style="font-family: Georgia, Hoefler Text, serif; letter-spacing: 0.3em; margin-bottom:1ex; text-align: center; padding: 0.6em; border: solid 2px darkblue; background-color: lightblue"><font color="black">''Check the scope. Click'' ''to leave a new message.''</div></b></font> | |||
<br> | |||
{{User:Samir (The Scope)/Talk archive}} | |||
<br> | |||
<div align="center" style="float:right; width:240px; font-size:9px;">__TOC__ {{User:Dragons flight/Category tracker/Summary}}</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!--NO BARNSTARS PLEASE!--> | |||
<!--New comments below this line!--> | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for June 3== | |||
== BTW == | |||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small> | |||
BTW, is there any chance you could wipe out my user page's history? I've becomed a bit alarmed by the number of administrators recently being stalked, called at work, etc, and I'm afraid I've been vocal about seeing some problem users banned. I just removed some personal information from the page. I'll create a backup page, ]; please move it into ] after you delete the original. -]<sup>]|]</sup> 07:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
==Re: Society of Friends of Science DYK== | |||
I live to serve :) --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 08:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == | |||
==Thank you== | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent RfA, which was successful. I'll do my best to wield the broom wisely! | ] <small>]</small> 18:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
==Spam ?== | |||
Being an admin one expects a little more restraint in language on your side You can disagree with my POV but to call it ridiculous is not civil. Please see ] to check what defines as Spam. A comment left on '''one''' other user- who has been party to a dispute being debated is NOT spam. And there is no asking for or against votes either. ] 09:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Fine, I'm sorry I called your argument ridiculous. Let me rephrase: your rationale is flawed in its argument to the extent that I'm not too sure you understand what's involved in sockpuppetry cases. And yes, any vote-garnering for an ArbCom election is spamming. Your choice of words on ]'s talk page was meant to garner votes. Here's the link: ]-- ] 09:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:: To quote from the ] "Briefly, I think '''a reasonable amount of communication about issues is fine'''. Aggressive propaganda campaigns are not. The difference lies in the disruption involved. If what is happening is getting everyone upset then it is a problem. Often '''the dividing line is crossed when you are contacting a number of people''' who do not ordinarily edit the disputed article." So I do beleive you are taking a very narrow view of the Canvassing, overall this case seems well within the definition quoted above. ] 09:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Here's a better quote: "However, it is agreed that disruptive canvassing, even if it seems to be within guidelines below, is never acceptable". Any canvassing of ArbCom votes, particularly with such statements as: is inappropriate. -- ] 09:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::: The first quote is better , for what is "disruptive" is the moot point that qualifies your quote. | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 --> | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
Why is my comment inappropriate ? If my beleif is that a candidate in the list is not ok and I am telling another (who has a past history with the candidate). I am letting the person make his own decisions and though my opinion is apparent (I have not hidden it and have discussed it openly) There is no hidden agenda. I am telling a person of arbcom votings and the presence of a candidate who I feel should not be there. While knowing Anwar's history against Blnguyen, I am letting him take his own decision, and hoping it would resonate with mine. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]) 10:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any ''selective'' databases, no independent sources. Does not meet ] or ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
:::::This was quite funny | |||
{{cquote|While knowing Anwar's history against Blnguyen, I am letting him take his own decision, and hoping it would resonate with mine.}}. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Once you strip down the sentence to the gist of the matter, both you and Anwar saadat are regarded as POV pushers and both of you hate blnguyen. Its obvious you were unmasked by samir. As for me I feel that certain users should have been blocked long ago for "resonating".<b>]]</b> 23:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Hitler picture == | |||
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == | |||
''Why do you have a picture of Hitler on your userpage? I thought I clicked the wrong link and couldn't believe that you were an ArbCom candidate when I saw that on your userpage.'' | |||
:Because it's a funny picture, when taken in context with the comment below it. It's hardly glorifying Hitler. ]<i>::</i><small>]</small> 11:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Ok. I guess I don't find Hitler funny -- ] 12:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::I don't either. The caption is the funny part. ]<i>::</i><small>]</small> 15:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::I guess I didn't get the joke. Sorry -- ] 16:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
== Ankit Fadia == | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
Can you take a look at ]? Thanks. - ] (]) 17:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Thanks! == | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 --> | |||
== Administrators will no longer be ] == | |||
I am feeling a little better. I still have almost no appetite and I'm a little tired all the time. I saw my doctor today though, said my blood pressure is fine and the white blood cell test looked pretty good. ] 01:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
A ] Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove ] from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with ], choose to ] this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the ]. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
== You Decided - No Edit on Ankit Fadia == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators/Message_list&oldid=1058184441 --> | |||
== How we will see unregistered users == | |||
There is nothing wrong with others. It's all wrong with Indian Misplaced Pages Administrators who have been given rights to modify contents for well purpose of wikipedia. But so sad that though a lot of evidence appears about ankit fadia on internet as well as on this same wikipedia page, you peoples are doing arguements to find reasons. I saw various edits from all you three admins and sent a mail to HO Misplaced Pages with the contents that you reported to be wrong. You want to know who is using this IP? They are all the members of all kalpesh sharma group sharing single IP. Do what you can, do this protest will not stop ? Because peoples of country are being saved. nothing is being done wrong by saying the fact and truth about ankit fadia. You are all three discussing and finding about various reasons to anyway edit ankit fadia contents to what it was and don't want peoples to see the right thing. This is a challenge that if you find any content edited in ankit fadia wiki which is wrong, then come out and debate ? | |||
<section begin=content/> | |||
Misplaced Pages is a reputed name for reputed peoples. Not for Ankit Fadia. If one or two or three articles were wrongly edited, we all might have not edited so many pages. but you are trying to specify that all the content edited about ankit fadia is wrong. Only you peoples are right ? All others are wrong is that what you mean. Then accept our challenge. | |||
Hi! | |||
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki. | |||
one more thing utcarsch, if you think what you mentioned above is right then you are wrong. Mr. Kalpesh always goes with evidence and proofs and that too right in front of eyes instead of barking on wikipedia like ankit fadia's article. As concerns to reputation how can you claim that this editing on wikipedia is because of media publicity. The pages on wikipedia have been edited by our group only from last 15 20 days, whereas ankit fadia's reputation is on net in the first thirty searches of google. First clear your concept and then speak. Go and view the logs of all the pages and urls that are posted in the article written on gather.com by kalpesh sharma itself. | |||
:I'd take you seriously if you stopped vandalising my page, the ] article, and dismissing the role of the AfD in judging content -- ] 03:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed. | |||
i still do not know why my article got deleted? any chance of clarification? | |||
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin '''will still be able to access the IP'''. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on ] to help. | |||
''':Fine Samir !''' Lets come down to point. I recently discussed my matter in last two or three days with Sam on and on Misplaced Pages Founder Jimmy_wales too. | |||
If you have not seen it before, you can ]. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can ] to ]. | |||
Please go through the following URL where our below debate exists: | |||
We have ] this identity could work. '''We would appreciate your feedback''' on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can ]. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January. | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Samuel_Blanning | |||
Thank you. | |||
Please go through the debate between us where he has specified that "Several reliable secondary sources have written about Ankit Fadia, which means we can write an article about him using those sources." | |||
/]<section end=content/> | |||
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
Then further he specified that "So long as the source is reliable in all other ways, then yes, print sources are just as valid as electronic ones." | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Johan (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=User:Johan_(WMF)/Target_lists/Admins2022(3)&oldid=22532499 --> | |||
== New administrator activity requirement == | |||
He has asked me to resolve the matter for WP:DRV (Review). I posted the matter there but that too was deleted without any specific reason. | |||
{{ivmbox|The administrator policy has been updated with new ] following a successful ]. | |||
Please let me know after going through the communication between me and sam. | |||
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have: | |||
One more request. I am an Expert in Security not in wiki shortcut codes. So I am sorry if due to understanding problem i might have done some mistakes unknowingly. I have started posting my article that too three or four times only. Because I was thinking that as wikipedia is a free to edit website, someone might be playing. | |||
#Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR | |||
#Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period | |||
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work. | |||
Any way please help me to get started. with | |||
}} | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Kalpesh_Sharma | |||
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=All_administrators&oldid=1082922312 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
. Here is the URL of my website where I have scanned and attached all my achievments, print and electronic media articles, radio news certifcate, certificate of work with minister, government stamped certificate of work with india army intelligence, etc. | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
My website URL is | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
http://www.esnips.com/web/shriganesh33sbusinessfiles | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
Kindly please do needfull as wikipedia does for all the notable peoples across globe. Nice talk. | |||
</div> | |||
Thanks ! | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 --> | |||
== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
'''Kalpesh Sharma''' | |||
:What you have to do is go to ] and state your case for keeping your article. If it is removed again, let me know and I will repost it. And kindly do not insult my intelligence by claiming that you were making sure someone was not fooling around; you put your article on my user page, on a number of other pages, and on the ] page. That tomfoolery (and your sophomoric commentary above on "Indian Misplaced Pages Administrators") does not give any credence whatsoever to your argument -- ] 07:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::I was bored, so here are the diffs: , , , , , , , , , . This on top of some 30 deleted edits. This is why people aren't taking you seriously. Maybe you should consider apologizing for your actions? -- ] 08:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Hey Samir. Looks like we got bored at the same time!!! Check out ]. I've been compiling this for the past hour. - ] (]) 08:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Please get back on: | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Ankit_Fadia#Kalpesh_on_Wikipedia | |||
And let me know that Why? can you give details. Utcursch has edited limca book of record on my request from following source: | |||
http://www.dailyexcelsior.com/02aug30/national.htm#9 | |||
Give me an explanation that on what basis the associated content mentioned above is not reliable source and how daily excelsior is reliable ? | |||
Thnx From: Kalpesh Sharma | |||
== |
== Minor request == | ||
Hello, I'm cleaning up the dwindling number of fostered content ] errors on Misplaced Pages, and have brought them down to 12 in user talk space. If you would be willing, would you adjust the following: | |||
so why did my page get deleted again? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 04:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
<pre> | |||
:Who '''are''' you? -- ] 04:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
{| cellpadding=2 style="background-color:AliceBlue;text-align:left" | |||
] | |||
|- | |||
|'''''Thank you!''''' | |||
</pre> | |||
to | |||
i forgot my username but i had an article titled britain sux and it was deleted within hours... | |||
:Oh right. Cause you shouldn't write rant-pieces about countries you hate and why you hate them. Post it on your own website or somewhere else if you have to. Doesn't belong here cause it's not encyclopedic. Understand now? -- ] 04:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<pre> | |||
gee, i was just asking n yea i understand.....can i write an article that shows historicla blunders of britain? | |||
{| cellpadding=2 style="background-color:AliceBlue;text-align:left" | |||
:Yeah, sure, if you can find sources for what you write -- ] 04:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
|- | |||
|] '''''Thank you!''''' | |||
</pre> | |||
on ] within the "RfA Thank you" section? | |||
k thx next time ill show u the article to make sure it wont get deleted for same reasons... | |||
This will correct this syntax issue. Thanks, ] (]) 19:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
:Ok, no probs -- ] 04:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== |
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | ||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
Thanks. It seems like that page goes through long periods of inactivity and then as soon as I go on to something else, it gets overwhelmed. ] 05:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
== Thanks == | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
Thanks for your help with the Wtstoffs stuff. —] ] 06:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
== Flowerykewlstuffz123 == | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
== Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder == | |||
*Well, (s)he created a bunch of crappy articles that were deleted and went all over the place defending them. (S)he then added to the ] page that all three characters were the mother of ] and they changed into men when they were rejected (which only happened in the anime); (s)he tried to say it was stated by one of the Starlights in the manga. I pasted all the lines the character said, none of them remotely match. In any case, most of the edits seem to just be troublemaking. ] 06:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
]This is a reminder that established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.{{pb}}Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the ].{{pb}}Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — ] 00:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Thanks== | |||
Thank you for the kind words, they are much appreciated. ] 18:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
== Starwood Request for comment == | |||
Hello, | |||
As someone who has commented or worked on articles affected by this, you may be interested to know that there is a ] and a ] page. --] (] • ]) 02:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
==My RfA== | |||
{| style="border:1px solid black; background:#CCFFCC; padding:3px;" align=center | |||
| ] {{PAGENAME}}, '''thank you''' for your support in ] which passed on 13th December 2006 with a tally of '''49/10/5'''. I am delighted by the result and a little daunted by the scope of additional responsibilities; I shall be cautious in my use of the new tools. I am well aware that becoming an Admin is not just about a successful nomination, but a continuing process of gaining further experience; for this I shall welcome your feedback. Again, many thanks for supporting my RfA :-) ] 03:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
As you'll appreciate, mid-RfA suddenly seemed the wrong moment to be commenting on that RfC Jance (what with having had past involvement both as unofficial mediator and also editor to article) and I heeded advice to "Don't make any noise" during the RfA. So i'll have a look at that RfC in the next couple of days and try and distill down some thoughts :-) ] <sup> ] </sup> 03:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
== Kalpesh Sharma on ANI == | |||
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
Please take a look at ]. - ] (]) 12:31, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
== Re your removal of a thread == | |||
] | |||
Regarding this removal . This editor is actually ]. After he made an off-topic post on an article talk page, I reminded him to keep the discussion about the improvement of the article, not on general commentary using template mess1. He responded with numerous personal attacks. I'm still waiting for someone to look in to it ].--] 21:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks Samir. Appreciate the time.--] 21:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
Hello Samir. Still regarding this user, ], I would appreciate if you could comment on the statement on his talk page. He keeps removing messages left there and asks users not to use his talk page. It's the first time I see such behavior, but I believe it inherently disrupts the good functioning of Misplaced Pages and therefore I ask your opinion. Also, in order to prevent this in the future I'd like to know if you would support amending ] so that it may state that "users have the right to contact other users on their talk pages". Best regards,--<strong><font style="color: #082567">]</font>]<font style="color: #082567">]</font></strong> 03:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
== Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
==What action on G. Patrick Maxwell== | |||
Could you tell me what WP:Office action was ever taken on this? Anywhere? I do not believe this ever occurred. IN fact, I have since looked at WP:Bio and elsewhere and a court case as a primary refernce, that is well documented, and a published opinion, is very acceptable. Why is it only n ot acceptable in the case of a doctor? I am curious.] 04:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Tyrenius was directly involved. I suggest you ask him -- ] 06:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Tyrenius also told me that back in August, but I can't find any evidence that it ever actually came under OFFICE protection. ''']''' 07:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::There should be evidence of the OFFICE template and edits by the Dannyisme account if it was under OFFICE. ''']''' 07:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Agreed, Samir. I'm not defending any of her edits, I was just responding to the question re whether it ever came under WP:OFFICE. ''']''' 07:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::And that was what I was responding to, as well. It did not come under WP:OFFICE, for good reason. It was not defamatory and it meets WP:Bio requirements. This court case is a well-documented source and the ruling was not reversed. In fact, there was no appeal from the issue in that case. The case was remanded back to the trial court, and Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case, evidently on an unrelated issue. What was written was not defamatory. It would have been allowed under Wiki bio guidelines as a relevant, well-documented | |||
source. The trial court was, in fact, bound by that appellate decision. I don't intend adding the comment back, but this was wrong from the beginning. Now, would you mind asking DrOliver to be civil to other editors, since he is personally attacking Dr. Zuckerman and has at least twice in just the last day? ] 19:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::::I've explained the issue, I don't know the details of what was discussed, but I do know that your edit to the talk page was inappropriate. It was not wrong to remove it. Do not re-add it. -- ] 01:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
==Please help on breast implant article== | |||
Samir, I am hoping you can help on the implant page. <p> | |||
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
After droliver said in the discussion page that it would be OK to include common complications on the implant page, and given the suggestions of several health professionals on the discussion page, I included the language everyone agree to. Then droliver deleted it all without any explanation except to say that info is not necessary. <p> | |||
Take the survey ''''''. | |||
Ever since droliver's page was protected he has acted as if the article is his. You have been helpful re the links, so I hope you can help with the content. The article is very long, with considerable technical information, but doesn't een mention many of the most common local complications. Droliver's justification is that if complications are not specific to breast implants, they needn't be mentioned, but necrosis etc are important complications that are mentioned in virtually every other article on implants except this one in wiki. In addition, the "complications" section of the article is currently a misnomer because it includes a lengthy section on systemic diseases, which are not local complications and should be in a separate section.<p> | |||
Kind Regards, | |||
The bottom line is that despite the consensus of several health professionals that the article is too biased rather than balanced, droliver has reverted even small changes that everyone else agrees to. <p> | |||
] | |||
I am patiently trying to make small changes, based on peer-reviewed research, when others agree, but droliver just reverts when he disagrees. As an epidemiologist who works closely with physicians, I have never been in this situation before. When I write books or articles, if there is disagreement we discuss it -- one person with a different point of view doesn't just get to delete whatever he doesn't like. I'd be grateful for your help.] 03:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Yes, Dr. Zuckerman, we need to work on an NPOV version of that section. Myself and Dr. Ruben have put some suggestions on the talk page. -- ] 08:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Hey, ]? — ]<span class="plainlinks"> </span> 11:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
== Thanks == | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
..for the message. Guess my penchant for doing some of the most boring work a wiki can offer is finally official.... yay <tt>:P</tt> --] 09:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
== RVV == | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
It was no problem. It is a part of my everyday work here at wikipedia. God bless.--] 11:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
{{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{tls|smile}}, {{tls|smile2}} or {{tls|smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! {{{2|}}} | |||
</div><!-- Template:smile2 --> | |||
</div> | |||
== PCD userbox == | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
FYI. There is a new userbox on ]. Click on ] to access. Please pass this around. Merry Christmas! ] 14:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Merry Christmas == | |||
] wishes you a Merry Christmas!]] | |||
Hi Samir! I just want to say Merry Christmas to you! Have a nice holiday time. If you don't observe this event then I hope you don't mind this greeting. :) - ] 20:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Yes, Merry Christmas Samir, and thanks for your very friendly and much-appreciated comment on my talk page :) Cheers, '''] <sup>] · ] ]</sup>''' 10:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Page == | |||
Thanks for finding and deleting that, Samir. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 20:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Sandbox deletion == | |||
What was the last edit to my sandbox? Because I know I didn't do that. '''<font color="#FE474B">♥</font> ]]]''' 21:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I swear, I didn't do it. Can you restore it please? '''<font color="#FE474B">♥</font> ]]]''' 00:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::Wait a sec. What the hell? I was nowhere near a computer at 10:11 UTC. I was at school, working on math. '''<font color="#FE474B">♥</font> ]]]''' 00:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Oh, wait, I get what happened. I put the db notice on ], and that template was transcluded in the sandbox. But I don't see how "has left Misplaced Pages" got in there. What the hell... And that still doesn't explain the time. '''<font color="#FE474B">♥</font> ]]]''' 00:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::Ah. That diff explains everything. The timestamp was from ages ago, sometime in June. Someone reverted it... but not me. So it explains ''almost'' everything. Funny. '''<font color="#FE474B">♥</font> ]]]''' 00:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== <s>Sigh</s> Thank you == | |||
I haven't even thought about it yet. I suppose I should. You know that there are a number of users who are angry with me don't you? Also, I dread the second question on the nomination form. Redvers was so nice to refer to my editting as gnomic. That is a very kind and generous way to describe the truth I've never written a featured article, or anything close. :-(. Only a semi-sad face though, because my writing is what it is. Yes, you may go ahead and conominate. That way I will feel guilty about your efforts if I don't submit the nom. Sincerely, --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 00:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Wow, that comment was not very gracious of me. You expressed you appreciation of me, and I failed to acknowledge it. I greatly respect you, and I am very much honored that you wish co-nominate me. Please do so and forgive my unmindfulness. Sincerely, ] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 03:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== It's fine == | |||
Thanks for the apology Samir, no offence was taken. Have a happy holidays (although I know what healthcare is like, and I imagine you will probably be very busy!). ]<i>::</i><small>]</small> 11:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Seraphimblade RfA == | |||
I caught your comment on the page, I thought I should let you know that I had posted an response. Seraphimblade and I are not really associated. I noticed his editor review was going well when I went to his talk page for advice. The advice he gave and continues to give has helped my progress as an editor. It would be unfortunate for his RfA to fail due to a dispute related to me. ] 12:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
{{user:Randfan/accomplishments/personal b-day stuff!/Winterval3}} | |||
-I was planning to hand these out on the 22nd of Dec. but things got in the way.... Happy holidays! </font></font>—<font style="background:white" size="1">''''']''''']]]</font><sup><font face=papyrus color=darkred>]</font></sup> 20:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hello! | |||
Could you help to move ] back to ]? | |||
You might also be interested to know that ] has been confirmed as a sockpuppeteer (] and ]). | |||
Sincerely, --] 12:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Moved. Thanks for letting me know -- ] 12:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Speedy deletion == | |||
Apologies, I believed the article was appropraite for speedy deletion but I'm sure we can come to an agreement. Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! | |||
Regards......]<sup>]</sup> <em style="font-size:10px;">15:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)</em> | |||
<noinclude><br /><br /><br /> | |||
== Teesside Futsal Club Page == | |||
Why was it deleted? | |||
== Merry Christmas == | |||
Saw you're online, so I wish you a merry Christmas. ] <small>]</small> 07:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Happy Holidays!!! == | |||
{| style=" background:lightblue; padding:3px;" align=center | |||
| ] <big>'''W'''</big>herever you are, and whether you're celebrating something or not, there is always a reason to spread the holiday spirit! So, may you have a great day, and may your wishes be fulfilled in 2007! ] 16:38, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:Thanks! ] 16:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Deletion of Yay Hooray? == | |||
Why did you delete the page about Yay Hooray? <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:09:25, 26 December 2006| 09:25, 26 December 2006|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | |||
:See ] and the deletion log for . --] 09:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== WP:RFC/NAME - Kuntan == | |||
Samir, as best I understand it, the general idea on closing RFCs is that one waits until either (a) consensus has been achieved, or (b) commenting has ceased for some time. In the case of article RFCs, they might stay open for a month. Also, I gather that it is generally not considered good form for an admin personally involved in debating or opposing an RFC to simply delete it while the RFC is still new, has not reached consensus, and is still gathering comments. | |||
The Kuntan RFC was opened at 21:56, 25 December 2006, and comments (including yours, mine, and others') were posted up to 12:19, 26 December 2006. You deleted this RFC at 13:10, 26 December 2006, a bare 51 minutes after the last comment, and less than 16 hours after the RFC was opened. This was also before I had even read the latest comment, and I strongly suspect it was before a number of other people might have read and written comments — though, of course, now I'll never know. No consensus had been reached. There hadn't even been time to try. This RFC was not ripe for deletion. | |||
I gather from your deletion comment that you feel your changing the reason on the block made this RFC moot. Possibly you missed my repeated statements in the RFC that my concern was the precedent set by the original block, a precedent which goes untouched by your change. At this point, any admin could still cite that original block as a precedent, to justify blocking any other user on a charge of "offensive username" if only one bad meaning can be found for it — and, as I demonstrated, such bad meanings could be construed for your own username and even that of Jimmy Wales. How many other users might be targeted on such grounds? | |||
Kindly restore that RFC to its previous location, as soon as possible, so that this precedent may be discussed (and possibly repudiated), and the proper application of ] may be clarified. I would appreciate having the shortest possible interruption in that RFC's availability. Thank you. | |||
(Please note, once again, that the '''''user conduct''''' of this individual is '''''not the topic''''' of the RFC, nor something I have any interest in debating.) <small>– ] <sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> ''15:44, 26 Dec 2006 (UTC).''</small> | |||
:The RfC is closed. The issue is over as the user has been blocked for trolling and not for username. If you have an issue with it, I suggest ] or filing a user conduct RfC against myself. -- ] 10:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== The Pale Pacific == | |||
Hey, I checked http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion, and don't see how my article meets the criteria. Please explain! | |||
-gert | |||
== Accepted Nomination == | |||
Hi Samir, I have accepted your ] I have notified Redvers and requested that he list the nomination. If it turns out that he is busy with real life, I would be honored to have you list the nomination. I did notice that there is a date on the top that will need to be reset. Sincerely, --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 22:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:04, 19 November 2024
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allan S. Detsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Proposed deletion of Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
The article Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Minor request
Hello, I'm cleaning up the dwindling number of fostered content WP:LINT errors on Misplaced Pages, and have brought them down to 12 in user talk space. If you would be willing, would you adjust the following:
{| cellpadding=2 style="background-color:AliceBlue;text-align:left" ] |- |'''''Thank you!'''''
to
{| cellpadding=2 style="background-color:AliceBlue;text-align:left" |- |] '''''Thank you!'''''
on User talk:Samir/Archive 6 within the "RfA Thank you" section? This will correct this syntax issue. Thanks, Zinnober9 (talk) 19:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder
This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)