| Revision as of 23:58, 27 December 2006 editH (talk | contribs)23,582 edits →{{user|An account}}← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:15, 10 December 2024 edit undoSYSS Mouse (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,152 edits archivingTag: Manual revert | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{RFCUsername}} ] ] | |||
| {{shortcut|]}} | |||
| If you believe someone has chosen an inappropriate username under Misplaced Pages's ], you may list it here. However, before listing the user here, please '''first contact the user on his or her talk page and give them an opportunity to change usernames voluntarily.''' | |||
| ==Reports== | |||
| Names that are offensive, inflammatory, impersonating an existing user, or asserting inappropriate authority will generally be permanently blocked by visiting admins. If a matter turns out to be controversial, a subpage may be created here to discuss it. | |||
| Please remember that this is ''not a vote'', rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion. | |||
| <!-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --> | |||
| <!-- Usernames should be *discussed* with the user prior to reporting here. --> | |||
| <!-- Undiscussed reports will be removed summarily. --> | |||
| <!-- Please be sure to use the {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}} template: --> | |||
| <!-- New reports go at the TOP, below this line. --> | |||
| :''Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.'' | |||
| ''Tools : ], ]'' | |||
| ----<!-- Below this one --> | |||
| ''New listings below this line, '''at the bottom''', please.'' | |||
| '''' | |||
| ---- | |||
| =={{user|Bitchen}}== | |||
| This user states "This author also feels use of this word is not swearing or profane and that its resemblance to the expletive noted above, while etymological, is unfortunate." Unfortunate maybe, but username offensiveness is in the eye of the beholder, not the user. I'm afraid that many other people would be offended by this. Note the user has been around since March, but has not made a ton of contributions. My suggestion would be to ask him nicely to change it first, but what to do if he refuses? (as I suspect he might) ] | ] 17:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *I don't think that is profane. I believe it a reference to the word ''bitchin'' which was a valley girl term used in the 1980's synonymous with the word "cool". ]<small> <sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 17:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *That was my impression too, especially since the user noted its etymological resemblance. It doesn't seem that it will be a problem to me. —] 18:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *I, too, don't think this is too big of a problem. ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 18:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *I would have no problem with allowing this one if the user does not voluntarily change it. --]<font color="green">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 19:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **Honestly guys you are missing the point. I know what it refers to (which doesn't matter if someone finds it offensive) and I'm not asking for your personal opinions, but whether it is likely there are people out there who would offended by it. It does contain the word "bitch" rather prominently. Can you take off your "it doesn't offend me" hats and think about other people? ] | ] 01:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***Taking my hat off, nope, still looks fine, putting my hat back on. ]<small> <sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 01:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***"I don't think this is a problem" != "it doesn't offend me"<br />"I don't think this is a problem" == "I don't believe the editor should be indefinitely banned because of their username, as 'bitch' is a perfectly legitimate word that has meanings well outside the bounds of profanity" ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 22:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **For ], != means '''Not equal''' and == means '''Equal'''. ]<small> <sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 00:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **I'll clarify my comment, which was indeed ambiguous: I do not believe there is a high likelihood of users taking offense at the name. --]<font color="green">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 01:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***It's, like, totally all right with me. Y'know? <font face="Verdana">]<sup>'']]''</sup></font> 09:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *** '''Comment''' - According to Urban Dictionary, "gink" can be an offense disparaging term as well. I personally don't think any reasonable person would be offended by your username, but can we really ever be too careful? ] 19:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **** '''Comment''' Yes, we can be. Should we ban me because someone ''might'' confuse "EVula" with ]? (don't laugh; it has happened) ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 22:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *Widely used slang term. We should not ban a name because some hypothetical unusually sensitive person might be offended by it. ] 19:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Strong disallow''' Vulgar slang term. Never heard of the word "gink" though, but "bitchen" is quite profane. As in "he sizzles his hands through the air with his bitchen guitar playing", it's more like a ] of "cool" than it is a synonym since it's a profane version of it. ] 20:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| **If you see it as a ] of "cool" then what part of it is profane? ]<small> <sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 16:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***Comment: Think about it. "Abso-fucking-lutely" is a hyponym of "Absolutely". Would it be allowed as a user name? ]...''<small><font color="#008822">]</font></small>'' 21:55, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ****For what it's worth, my argument is that "bitch" is an actual word outside of its profane meaning, whereas "fuck" is, and pretty much has always been, profanity. (though the urge to answer "abso-fucking-lutely" just because was pretty strong) ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 22:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *****Compare to results of {{user|Poop}}, which also has ]. ] 22:56, 25 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ******You're absolutely right, which is why the user wasn't blocked for having a profane name. ]: "... Names that refer to or allude to reproductive or excretory functions of the body." ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 04:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *******...and what about {{user|Bitch}}? Seriously, it cannot be that hard to find one. ] 05:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ********Hypothetical situation for a non-existent user. I'd be fine with the username, though ''highly'' suspect of their edits. ] <span style="color: #999;">// ] // ] //</span> 15:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *****Doesn't seem to be a huge deal, but I have no strong opinion. ] 06:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *I don't think this really that offensive and don't consider it a problem. However, I think the word is ''bitchin'''.] 23:54, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| =={{user|An account}}== | |||
| It's not offensive, but I feel that this username is too generic, and too much like the perma-banned ]. A more specific account name should be used to specify this editor. ] 21:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *The name looks fine. Generic is fine as far as I know. It is enough to recognize and distinguish between other editors. The similar name of the banned user is not really a problem as that user is long gone and the distinction is adequate. ]<small> <sup>(Need help? ])</sup></small> 23:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:15, 10 December 2024
Shortcuts
|
Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • Purge page cache |
This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Misplaced Pages's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:
- Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Misplaced Pages:Usernames for administrator attention.
- For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.
Do NOT post here if:
- the user in question has made no recent edits.
- you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Misplaced Pages:Blocking policy § Unblocking).
Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:
- has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
- has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
- is not already blocked.
If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Misplaced Pages's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.
Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.
Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList
Reports
Please remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.
- Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.
Category: