Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Penelope Pussycat: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:17, 25 July 2020 editWidr (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators303,327 edits Reverted to revision 969194666 by Adamant1 (talk) (TW)Tag: Undo ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 00:10, 29 July 2020 edit undoAtlantic306 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers154,099 edits →Penelope Pussycat: Closed as keep (XFDcloser)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
⚫	===]===
			:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
	{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|F}}
			<!--Template:Afd top

			Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

			The result was '''keep'''. <small>]</small> ] (]) 00:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
		⚫	===]===
	<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>		<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
	:{{la\|Penelope Pussycat}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)		:{{la\|Penelope Pussycat}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 15:		Line 20:
	*'''Keep''': I added several references to the article. The character is discussed quite a bit in the 1998 book '''', in the chapter "Ah Love! Zee Grand Illusion! Pepé Le Pew, Narcissism and Cats in the Casbah". — ] (]) 23:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)		*'''Keep''': I added several references to the article. The character is discussed quite a bit in the 1998 book '''', in the chapter "Ah Love! Zee Grand Illusion! Pepé Le Pew, Narcissism and Cats in the Casbah". — ] (]) 23:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
	*'''Keep''' given nominator's desire to withdraw, the presence of sources, and the new adds from Toughpigs. -] (]) 02:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' given nominator's desire to withdraw, the presence of sources, and the new adds from Toughpigs. -] (]) 02:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
			*'''Keep:''' Agreed. Now it is clearly notable. - ] (]) 14:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
			{{clear}}
			:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 00:10, 29 July 2020

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Penelope Pussycat

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references. Fails WP:GNG. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:21, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:27, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Redirect to Pepé Le Pew. Redirects are cheap. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:11, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Keep Did you not see the 2 references at the bottom of the article? I added the "reflist" template so that they show up closer to the top. So, your "no references" rationale fails. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:33, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

You are correct, I would withdraw my nomination if I could. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

From what I've heard you can comment I withdraw at the bottom of the AfD and someone will come around eventually to close it. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Keep: I added several references to the article. The character is discussed quite a bit in the 1998 book Reading the Rabbit: Explorations in Warner Bros. Animation, in the chapter "Ah Love! Zee Grand Illusion! Pepé Le Pew, Narcissism and Cats in the Casbah". — Toughpigs (talk) 23:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Keep given nominator's desire to withdraw, the presence of sources, and the new adds from Toughpigs. -2pou (talk) 02:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Keep: Agreed. Now it is clearly notable. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:08, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.