Revision as of 20:49, 28 December 2006 editDoc glasgow (talk | contribs)26,084 edits →FYI: r← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:24, 17 October 2020 edit undoScott MacDonald (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,363 edits redirectTags: Manual revert 2017 wikitext editor | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT ] | |||
{{User:Doc glasgow/tidy}} | |||
<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-6 DoUnreplied-Yes Target-User talk:Doc glasgow/Dec 06--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
== User name created to Slur an individual == | |||
You visit the user page for Bruce cairney before and removed 'unhelpful comments' how about deleting the user completely it is obvoiusly only created to sling mud and BS <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 09:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
== Huh? == | |||
You posted the following on my talk page but it doesn't make any sense. I have no idea of which archive you are talking about or why/what was done. Could you educate me? ] 14:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Churches == | |||
I think the best idea would be to merge it into ], and redirect it there. LOCAL is mostly stable and focuses on merging rather than deletion. I don't think it's all that helpful to have WP:SUPERMARKET, WP:RESTAURANT, WP:CHURCH and WP:GAS_STATION and other subsections. Obviously is a church is large enough to be known outside its own city, people can't say "delete per WP:LOCAL". HTH! ] 09:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== FYI == | |||
Despite of your "IRC" opinion that I am "not worth it", It is only fair of me to give you notification of this edit of mine here , and chance to respond to it. I mention it only because the thread is now so long things are easily missed, and I never talk behind people's backs - a concept I don't expect you to understand. ] 20:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:I'm not going to bother responding to that. When I say you are "not worth it", I meant simply that there is no point in getting upset at, surprised by, or trying to cure, your incivility and assumptions of bad faith. But I guess you'll want to assume I meant something altogether more sinister. I now intend to follow my own advice and comment no further.--]<sup>g</sup> 20:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
::::Good idea Doc, shame you ever commented in the first place really, isn't it? ] 20:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::::Yes, you'd have a lot less to troll over if I hadn't.--]<sup>g</sup> 20:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:24, 17 October 2020
Redirect to: