Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Frank Senn: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:08, 29 July 2020 editDMySon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,808 edits Weak Keep← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:36, 12 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. Consensus is clear that the subject's role as a reputable scholar suffices to meet our criteria for inclusion. ] ] 01:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}


<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
Line 13: Line 20:
*'''Weak keep''' Seems to just about be notable. ]. -] (]) 09:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC) *'''Weak keep''' Seems to just about be notable. ]. -] (]) 09:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep''' Article needs more citations. But it seems notable.] 08:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC) *'''Weak Keep''' Article needs more citations. But it seems notable.] 08:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep''': rather impressive Google Scholar results for the subject area suggests he passes ] #1. ]] (]) 17:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
*'''Weak Keep''' as stated by Afuller2028 ] (]) 03:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' as per the reviews shown in this discussion that show that his works have received academic reviews which isn't surprising as he has 3700+ library holdings,passes ] in my view, ] (]) 20:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 05:36, 12 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is clear that the subject's role as a reputable scholar suffices to meet our criteria for inclusion. BD2412 T 01:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Frank Senn

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Frank Senn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has several problems. I would put it at WP:BLPPROD, but it has a source (albeit with questionable reliability). The vast majority of the content is unsourced, and the two sources in the article are terrible. One is broken, and even if it were to work, should not be considered. It is by the church he is a pastor at. A pastor's page on a church website is not neutral. The other article mentions Frank a single time, and is clearly not about him. This may even be a WP:GNG fail, as I cannot find any sources about him elsewhere. The unsourced content is so great in number that the article would likely not be salvageable if it were all to be removed. I-82-I | TALK 22:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. I-82-I | TALK 22:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.