| Revision as of 01:37, 2 August 2020 editBD2412 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators2,450,534 edits →Frank Senn: The result was '''keep'''. Consensus is clear that the subject's role as a reputable scholar suffices to meet our criteria for inclusion.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:36, 12 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| *'''Keep''' as per the reviews shown in this discussion that show that his works have received academic reviews which isn't surprising as he has 3700+ library holdings,passes ] in my view, ] (]) 20:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' as per the reviews shown in this discussion that show that his works have received academic reviews which isn't surprising as he has 3700+ library holdings,passes ] in my view, ] (]) 20:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 05:36, 12 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus is clear that the subject's role as a reputable scholar suffices to meet our criteria for inclusion. BD2412 T 01:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Frank Senn
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Frank Senn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has several problems. I would put it at WP:BLPPROD, but it has a source (albeit with questionable reliability). The vast majority of the content is unsourced, and the two sources in the article are terrible. One is broken, and even if it were to work, should not be considered. It is by the church he is a pastor at. A pastor's page on a church website is not neutral. The other article mentions Frank a single time, and is clearly not about him. This may even be a WP:GNG fail, as I cannot find any sources about him elsewhere. The unsourced content is so great in number that the article would likely not be salvageable if it were all to be removed. I-82-I | TALK 22:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. I-82-I | TALK 22:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:13, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep I found multiple reviews for multiple books, including . That makes a case for WP:NAUTHOR. The article isn't in great shape, but I don't think it's quite so bad as for WP:TNT. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- I would agree with Russ Woodroofe. Senn is a well-known academic, theologian, and author in western liturgical studies. Might be one of the premier scholars in the area across North America. Seems like this article just needs better sources and content in line with Misplaced Pages's guidelines. Afuller2028 (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep Seems to just about be notable. Deletion is not cleanup. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Article needs more citations. But it seems notable.DMySon 08:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: rather impressive Google Scholar results for the subject area suggests he passes WP:PROF #1. StAnselm (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Keep as stated by Afuller2028 DocumentError (talk) 03:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as per the reviews shown in this discussion that show that his works have received academic reviews which isn't surprising as he has 3700+ library holdings,passes WP:NAUTHOR in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.