Revision as of 06:40, 2 August 2020 editArorae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,200 edits →Potential copyright violation: new section← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 03:07, 13 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,280,214 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Articles for creation}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}, {{WikiProject Law}}. Keep 1 different rating in {{WikiProject Micronesia}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{WikiProject Law |class=|importance=}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=Stub|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|ts=20200803032716|reviewer=DocumentError|oldid=970798584}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Micronesia|Kiribati=y|class=start|importance=mid |Kiribati-importance=mid}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Potential copyright violation == |
|
== Potential copyright violation == |
Line 5: |
Line 10: |
|
* Potential copyright violation as per log b 05:19 EranBot talk contribs marked revision 970753900 on Draft:Constitution of Kiribati as a potential copyright violation. |
|
* Potential copyright violation as per log b 05:19 EranBot talk contribs marked revision 970753900 on Draft:Constitution of Kiribati as a potential copyright violation. |
|
|
|
|
|
I should have been the user that has made this potential copyright violation, but I shall immediately point the fact that this is not a copyright violation because of the licence of the source. |
|
I should have been the user that has made this potential copyright violation, but I shall immediately point the fact that this is not a copyright violation because of the licence of the source is marked as Creative Commons License: BY-NC-ND. With no copyright indication.-] (]) 06:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
-] (]) 06:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC) |
|
I should have been the user that has made this potential copyright violation, but I shall immediately point the fact that this is not a copyright violation because of the licence of the source is marked as Creative Commons License: BY-NC-ND. With no copyright indication.-Arorae (talk) 06:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)