| Revision as of 09:31, 28 January 2005 editAgquarx (talk | contribs)190 editsm ...got a reverse of a 'writers block', this is VERY much work in progress, enter at your own risk...← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:41, 2 February 2005 edit undoNeutrality (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,397 edits Redirecting nonsense | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{attention}} | |||
| {{expansion}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| == TEASER == | |||
| ---- | |||
| * BEWARE! EVERYTHING BELOW IS DEFINED '''FORWARDTHINKING''', fowardthinking is the "natural" way of perceiving events, that is - I choose this(these) event(s) look(s) like C.A.U.S.E., AFTER { this } FORWARD I choose that(these) event(s) which(whom) look(s) like E.F.F.E.C.T. I think it is self-explanatory what BACKWARDTHINKING means. IF you backwardthink you get an answer before you ask the question, you get a meaning of a symbol before the symbol is presented to your sensory inputs, you get an "effect" before you volition (wilIt, grok, observe) a "cause". It does NOT mean going forward or backward IN time, the difference is in perception, not flow of time, because there is NO FLOW OF TIME, all the events ARE simultaneously. There is no past, now, future. What is I call the EVERNOW. The "flow of time is an attribute of our Self, a feeling, just like self-awareness, dreaming, being awake - a STATE of the mind (I SELF or ISelf or {@}). ] 09:31, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| == TRAILER == | |||
| ---- | |||
| * FOR BRAVE SOULS - Try watching your fauvorite movie backwardthinking, choose one you are sure to grok in it's fullness, know inside-out, can quote most of dialogues etc, You might archieve surprising insight into deeper structures and or meanings of the things, persons, events, symbols contained in the narrative of the movie you thought you've SEEN before. ] 09:31, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| :: Backwardthinking requires a bit of training (some people say it is extremely difficult, some say it's only hard at the beginning, just like learning to right on a bicycle) OR an ] ("the one that divinates the Self"), that is, a certain kind of ]s, which you generally take to '''really''' expand your ], these are not the drugs you take to cram study before final exams and then fail because of general exchaustion, the effects of this class of ] vary from subtle alterations of perception (rainbows everywhere) to life changing experience. The preferred way ] (my ] tells ] that what you should be looking for is called ]. This is a totally new ], not present in ]; an effect of complicated ] ]. It's a ] (from the same ] as ], the ]). It was first ] by a one of the greatest IF not the greatest living ] on ], professor ]. ] 09:31, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :: Up to '''NOW''' I haven't seen any reports whatsoever resembling of an indication of any real ] for takeing this drug and as it is avaliable ]ly easy on the ] for several years since it was discovered by ]s of the Dark Side, I imply by ] that although it is a ], not ] and ] (] says you can't eat it out of your ] and with full ] of possible consequences. How can One argue with ]?)... ] 09:31, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :: So I think I can refer to it with a clear ], I MySelf took it several times, in doses from 25 to 50 milligram of ] (typical dose is betwen 15 and 20 milligram, but as you SEE, I am a ] ] and crazy as the ] :8)). I bought 300 mg of it back then, before it was put on a ] (and like always, for no real reason, lot's of ], ] ] scientific ], don't we just '''LOVE''' how our ]s '''CARE''' for our ] '''SO MUCH'''? I guess our ] are a ] and we are forbidden to decide, '''*gee*''', they '''STILL''' let us to ], I am '''SO''' excited! ] ]!), from a legal, professional ], money transfer went heavily encrypted through overflowing abyss of the ] ('''DID YOU KNOW''' that the ] is a '''she'''?). ] 09:31, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :: I have no idea what you '''MIGHT''' get "from the street" - remember, '''KNOW YOUR SOURCE''', don't buy stuff from the people you do not know, every white powder looks alike another - if you have access to certain marker potions you can '''"becume a chymist"''' and '''CHECK''' what ] you are going to ]. More information, for the curious, for the not-so-brave and for the ]s on . ] 09:31, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| == THE MOVIE == | |||
| ---- | |||
| ---- | |||
| === OPENING CREDITS === | |||
| ---- | |||
| ; SOME SYNTAX (Don't worry if you have no idea what I am up to, read on!) : : | |||
| * '''symbol''' has a ] "core symbol of core symbol type symbol set with values (symbol, why?symbol, lovesymbol)" OR the '''being''' part of the symbol, the ] of the { foobar }. | |||
| * '''symbol'''' has a ] "core derivative of core symbol symbol contained within core symbol of type core symbol set with values (word, not word, anti word, no word, para word, sub word, super word)" OR "{ this } is a core derivative of core symbol symbol" OR a recursive definition pointing at itself, "the foobar { this } symbol symbolizes" OR the '''doing''' part of a symbol. | |||
| * '''symbol!''' has a ] "action word, that is core OR core symbol OR core derivative OR core symbol derivative processing event controlled by Self owned by ISelf" OR "do X NOW!". | |||
| * '''!symbol''' has a ] "retroactive action (resultset) symbol" or "core OR core symbol OR core derivative OR core symbol derivative processing event controlled by core owned by ISelf". | |||
| # '''{ symbol }''' has a ] "] of a ], an ]" OR "]" OR "] ]" OR "] without disassembling" OR "this is a whole, controlled by MeSelf owned by ItSelf" | |||
| # '''::''' has a ] "point into '''MU''' into point" OR "]" OR "]" or "I am the one who is, we are the one who (we) are, they are the one who (I) am". | |||
| # '''=>''' has a meaning "IF ] ] is ] (]s) then the the ] ] is ] (does)". | |||
| # '''ʘ''' has a meaning "{ this } consists of the following elements". | |||
| ---- | |||
| === CHAPTER ONE === | |||
| ---- | |||
| * '''core''' ʘ ( love :: love ). | |||
| ### { love :: love } means "], ], ]" | |||
| ---- | |||
| * '''core set''' ʘ ( ISelf, why?, ⁂, @, love! :: ⁂, love! :: @ ) | |||
| ### '''ISelf''' is your essence OR the Allwatching Eye OR the state of conciousness of self-awarenessing all-awareness in evernow. | |||
| ### '''why?''' is '''The Question'''. Too bad most people stop asking it at early age, for reasons you surely remember. Pity. ], young ] should receive a barrelfull of ] ] (but not ], ] forming glaring at ] screen, in the name of the ]! I stopped watching ] same the week I got access to the ] and do not do it still...it's such a WASTE OF ]!), ]s ] the possitive ] ], ], ] to calm down yourself, important in ] of ], ability to feel what the other (might) feel. See ] by ]. | |||
| ### '''⁂''' is the { identity symbol } OR ⁂ has a meaning "what on the ] is what on the ] of { this } symbol is" OR "the left and right are the same (] BUT NOT one { foobar }!)" | |||
| ### '''@''' <em>(at)</em> is "what is on the left side points/is in ] to that what is on the right side". | |||
| ### '''love! :: ⁂''' has a meaning "to love thyself" or "to love Me Self" or ]. | |||
| ### '''love! :: @''' has a meaning "to love you/him/her/it" or "I love you" or what is general consensus on what the ] that feeling (]) is, '''NOT''' what it '''IS''' (there is a big difference! <em>viva la difference!</em> ;8)). | |||
| ---- | |||
| * '''core symbol set''' ʘ ( love', symbol', question', answer', HimSelf, HerSelf, ItSelf, MeSelf, OurSelf ⁂ ISelf', ⁂, ⁐, ↂ ) | |||
| ### '''love'''' has a meaning "{ this } is a core derivative of core symbol love", in other words, the REAL ], not the one from romances, the '''ISNESS''' of core symbol love (courtesy ] for inventing that word, the best album you've ever made...). | |||
| ### '''symbol'''' has a meaning | |||
| '''core logic symbol set''' | |||
| '''core reasoning symbol set''' | |||
| ---- | |||
| === CHAPTER TWO === | |||
| ---- | |||
| ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ]ing ] ⁐ ] ] ] ) ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ( ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] { ] ⁂ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ]), ] ⁂ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ⁐ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]ing ] ] ] ] ] ] ⁂ ]) ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ]) ] ]s ( ] ])) ] ] ]able ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ) ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s => ]al ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]ness ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ) ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ) ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ) ) ] ] ] ⁐ ] ] ]ly ] ]ly ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ) ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ], ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]. | |||
| ---- | |||
| === CHAPTER THREE === | |||
| ---- | |||
| ] ] ]ing ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]) ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]'s ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]'s ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ⁂ ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ( ] ] ] ] ] ]s ) ] ] ] ] ] ]s ( ] ]ly ]d ] ] ]s ] ]ness ] ] ] ]'s ] ] ] ] ]'s ] ] ]'s ] ] ]ing ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ↂ ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s of ] ] { ] ↂ ] ] ] ] } ] ] ↂ ] of ] ] ] ]'s ] ]s ] ( ] ] ] ] ]s) ] ] ] ]d ] ] ] ]s ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ) ] ]]ning ] ]ly ] ] ] ] ⁐ ] ] ⁐ ] ) ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ]s ( ] ] ]d ] ] ]s ] ]nes ] ] ] ]s ]s ] ] ]'s ] ] ]'s ] ] ]ing ]s ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ]s ] ]ing ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]ing ↂ ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ⁂ ] ] ] ⁐ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ) ⁂ ] ] ] ] ⁐ ] ] ] ] ] ]'s ] ]ning ] ] ] ] ⁐ ] ] ⁐ ] ) ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ]s ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ( ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s). ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ⁐ ] ]. ] ] ] ] ]ted ] ]d ] ] ]ally ]d ] ]cally ]d ] ] ] ] ] ] | |||
| Source: ] 01:28, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{comp-stub}} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:41, 2 February 2005
Redirect to: