| Revision as of 15:03, 22 August 2020 editHorse Eye Jack (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,961 edits →Comments by other users← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:42, 3 December 2023 edit undoVanjagenije (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,561 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Ineedtostopforgetting/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tags: Replaced Manual revert | ||
| (937 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | <noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude> | ||
| {{SPIarchive notice|Ineedtostopforgetting}} | {{SPIarchive notice|1=Ineedtostopforgetting|deny=yes|notalk=yes|crosswiki=yes}} | ||
| {{SPIpriorcases}} | {{SPIpriorcases}} | ||
| ===22 August 2020=== | |||
| {{SPI case status|CUrequest}} | |||
| ====Suspected sockpuppets==== | |||
| * {{checkuser|1=Telsho}} | |||
| <!-- You may duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> | |||
| *'''Tools''': <span class="plainlinks"> • • </span> <small>''Auto-generated every hour.''</small> | |||
| 10-day old account making to Singapore-related pages that has already , ], edited other pages to add to Singapore, and has a of ]. CU for sleepers. —<span style="border:2px solid;background:#db2416;border-radius:5px;">]]</span> 08:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| * Possibly related: {{checkuser|1=Honoredebalzac345}} - Another fairly new account, similar editing patterns on international relations pages, had ended up in content disputes with the same user "Telsho" had accused of hounding, and which showed up at the ANI report linked above to defend Telsho. Some in the ANI thread remarked that both accounts were suspicious - courtesy ping {{u|Horse Eye Jack}}, {{u|CaptainEek}}, {{u|Loksmythe}}. —<span style="border:2px solid;background:#db2416;border-radius:5px;">]]</span> 09:02, 22 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== | |||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | |||
| * I think this but should be obvious but the Honoredebalzac345 account has always claimed to be Romanian but had never edited outside of China related topics until I pointed out their odd edit history and they diversified by adding a bit of editing in the television/pop culture space. None of it is related to Romania though, heck none of it is even loosely related to Europe. They also do this weird thing where they forget how to indent their comments on talk pages, except sometimes they appear to forget to forget but then go right back to forgetting later. I've interected with Ineedtostopforgetting socks before and these would fit the pattern of obsessive and abusive edits in the China related space, are we sure its not the Chinese authorities? Their editing priorities historically seem to have matched whatever is the issue de jure for the CCP. ] (]) 14:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| * For what its worth though while I think both of these users are sockpuppets I would be surprised if they had the same master. ] (]) 15:03, 22 August 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | |||
| ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | |||
Latest revision as of 00:42, 3 December 2023
Ineedtostopforgetting
Ineedtostopforgetting (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Ineedtostopforgetting/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Ineedtostopforgetting.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.
A clerk or checkuser recommends that new socks in this case not receive tags per WP:DENY.
This case's socks should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse.