Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Theodore Roosevelt IV: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:45, 4 September 2020 editPennsylvania2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,355 edits Opinion← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:30, 5 September 2020 edit undoBarkeep49 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, New page reviewers, Oversighters, Administrators40,820 edits Theodore Roosevelt IV: Closed as keep (XFDcloser
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
===]===
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
<!--Template:Afd top


Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''keep'''. There is clear consensus that this article's attribution history should be kept and a lesser, but still present, consensus that this topic should probably be an independent article rather than merged into a related topic. ] (]) 19:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
===]===
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|Theodore Roosevelt IV}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Theodore Roosevelt IV}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
Line 19: Line 24:
* '''Keep:''' OK Carrit; you won me over! - ] (]) 15:43, 23 August 2020 (UTC) * '''Keep:''' OK Carrit; you won me over! - ] (]) 15:43, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Relisting to allow discussion of the sources provided in the last but one !vote<br /> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />'''Relisting comment:''' Relisting to allow discussion of the sources provided in the last but one !vote<br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] (])</span> 05:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> <small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <span style="font-family:Papyrus">] (])</span> 05:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Delete''' based on Mr. White's well-reasoned analysis of the sources above which shows we do not have sourcing that actually shows notability.] (]) 15:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC) *'''Delete''' based on Mr. White's well-reasoned analysis of the sources above which shows we do not have sourcing that actually shows notability.] (]) 15:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' With all his engagements of various kind he seems quite notable. I think the users of Misplaced Pages would rightfully wonder "why isn't there an article about this person" if it were to be deleted. ] (]) 22:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC) *'''Keep''' With all his engagements of various kind he seems quite notable. I think the users of Misplaced Pages would rightfully wonder "why isn't there an article about this person" if it were to be deleted. ] (]) 22:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Line 26: Line 31:


*'''Keep''' As per Carrite ] (]) 02:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC) *'''Keep''' As per Carrite ] (]) 02:45, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 19:30, 5 September 2020

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is clear consensus that this article's attribution history should be kept and a lesser, but still present, consensus that this topic should probably be an independent article rather than merged into a related topic. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Theodore Roosevelt IV

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Theodore Roosevelt IV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not independently notable. Notability is not inherited. Being a member of notable organizations does not necessarily make an individual notable. and are the only reliable source coverage and they are both essentially trivial.--Michael White 20:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC) --Michael White 20:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
He's a managing director of Lehman Brothers, which, love them or hate them or hate them a lot, is probably sufficient rationale for maintenance of a WP bio to start with. Beyond that, however, he is regarded as an expert national opinion writer on natural preservation, per THIS piece as seen in the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram of May 27, 1997. Carrite (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
As a wildlife conservation activist, his participation on various projects has merited FRONT PAGE COVERAGE more than once, such as this Dec. 14, 1999 piece published in the Jackson Clarion-Ledger. Carrite (talk) 00:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
He was also a featured keynote speaker, covered in the press, at THIS 2006 ceremony commemorating the Devils Tower National Monument. Pretty clearly a GNG pass. Carrite (talk) 00:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
#1 reads more like a human interest story than significant coverage. Re managing director of Lehman Brothers, I disagree based on my quick research into the likely role of a managing director at Lehman Brothers. #2 is a piece by him, not significant coverage. From the first page of #3, it looks like the coverage is more about the event than him. In #4, there is only one sentence that refers to him.--Michael White 11:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Regardless of depth, I should also say that interviews like the first link Carrite provided don't count as independent coverage when they're based on the subject's own descriptions and can sometimes just be self-promotion. Their own writings also don't count when not independent of the subject, meaning the second link doesn't establish notability either. What we would need to merit an article are multiple pieces from publications not closely affiliated with Roosevelt that goes into depth on him. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep: OK Carrit; you won me over! - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:43, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to allow discussion of the sources provided in the last but one !vote
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 05:05, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
I agree and would ask "why isn't there an article about this person". Yet it appears we are strongly divided and unlikely to get consensus - Ret.Prof (talk) 16:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.