Talk:Invasion of the Cape Colony: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 00:03, 16 September 2020 editAnomieBOT (talk \| contribs)Bots6,556,660 edits Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2020-09-15. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 15:34, 15 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk \| contribs)Bots7,269,677 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject South Africa}}, {{WikiProject Netherlands}}, {{WikiProject United Kingdom}}, {{WikiProject British Empire}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Talk header}}		{{Talk header}}
			{{Article history
	{{GA\|19:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)\|topic=Warfare\|page=1\|oldid=668162627}}
			\|action1=GAN
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|1=
			\|action1date=19:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
			\|action1link=Talk:Invasion of the Cape Colony/GA1
			\|action1result=listed
			\|action1oldid=668162627

			\|currentstatus=GA
		⚫	\|dykdate=19 July 2015\|dykentry=... that a year after the successful British ''']''' in 1795, a Dutch reinforcement convoy was forced to surrender at the ''']'''?\|dyknom=Template:Did you know nominations/Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795)
			\|otd1date=2017-09-15\|otd1oldid=800610794
			\|otd2date=2020-09-15\|otd2oldid=978222650
			\|topic=Warfare
			}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=GA\|1=
	{{WikiProject Military history\|class=GA		{{WikiProject Military history\|class=GA
	<!-- B-Class 5-criteria checklist -->		<!-- B-Class 5-criteria checklist -->
Line 10:		Line 22:
	\|B5 <!-- Supporting materials --> =y		\|B5 <!-- Supporting materials --> =y
	\|Maritime=y\|British=y\|Dutch=y\|Early-Modern=y\|African=y}}		\|Maritime=y\|British=y\|Dutch=y\|Early-Modern=y\|African=y}}
	{{WikiProject South Africa~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=Mid\|Military history=y}}		{{WikiProject South Africa\|importance=Mid\|Military history=y}}
	{{WikiProject Netherlands~~\|class=GA~~\|dyk=yes}}		{{WikiProject Netherlands\|dyk=yes}}
	{{WikiProject United Kingdom~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=Mid}}		{{WikiProject United Kingdom\|importance=Mid}}
	{{WikiProject British Empire~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=mid}}		{{WikiProject British Empire\|importance=mid}}
	}}		}}
⚫	~~{{dyktalk~~\|19 July\|2015\|~~entry~~= ... that a year after the successful British ''']''' in 1795, a Dutch reinforcement convoy was forced to surrender at the ''']'''?\|~~nompage~~=Template:Did you know nominations/Invasion of the Cape Colony (1795)}}
	{{OnThisDay\|date1=2017-09-15\|oldid1=800610794\|date2=2020-09-15\|oldid2=978222650}}

	==Naval battle or infantry?==		==Naval battle or infantry?==

Latest revision as of 15:34, 15 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Invasion of the Cape Colony article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Invasion of the Cape Colony has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 22, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 19, 2015.The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a year after the successful British invasion of the Cape Colony in 1795, a Dutch reinforcement convoy was forced to surrender at the Capitulation of Saldanha Bay?

Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 15, 2017, and September 15, 2020.

This article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / African / British / Dutch / European / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	African military history task force
	British military history task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

South Africa: African military history Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the African military history task force.

Netherlands

	Netherlands portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands
	A Netherlands Did you know article.

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

British Empire Mid‑importance

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Naval battle or infantry?

comment removed from article:

NOT A NAVAL OPERATION MORE INFANTRY THAN ANYTHING. The Major Gordon may have been killed or suicided, his widow selling Merino Sheep to Naval Captains Waterhouse & Kent for shipping to Australia in january 1797, the first Merinos to Australia. Keith Dawson Toowoomba Qld nanke@gil.com.au Ps there is doubt about the Gordon as Waterhouse's letter to Sir Joseph Banks says Colonel Gordon. Only death I can find is William Augustus Gordona Major, he died in March 1796. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.40.2 (talk • contribs)

Possibly a consequence of the French Revolution

Hearsay or fact? William, Prince of Orange traded the Dutch settlement at the Cape of Good Hope in return for protection of the Dutch royalty following fear of French-incited revolution by the Dutch commoners or, as happened, a Napoleonic invasion of the Netherlands. The British sent a naval force to present the terms of the exchange, but were met with resistance because the Dutch settlers had not yet received news warning of the contract from the Netherlands.

The suicidee William Gordon refered to in the article above was the person after whom Gordons Bay was named.

Potion 12:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I have Heard also that it was the threat of French conquest of Holland that spurred Brittan to take the cape.

Orangutanlibrarian 08:26 12 March 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orangutanlibrarian (talk • contribs) 18:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Tidy Up

As part of a push for a Good Topic I will be tidying up a version of this article in my userspace over the next week or so. I note that aside from vandalism there has been no serious activity on this page for some time, but if any one has concerns, questions or comments please do get in touch. I may also redirect this article to a new title reflecting the fact that it covers the whole of the invasion, not just the (very small) Battle of Muizenberg (which in any other context would barely be a skirmish). Best--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

I have now completed this tidy up, comprehensively expanding the article, completely resourcing it and making general improvements. I have also moved it - the article as it stood covered more than the minor skirmishing at Muizenberg anyway, and the new version covers the whole campaign. The redirect Battle of Muizenberg contains the article history for the article's previous incarnation. Any questions or comments, shoot them my way.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

And it came to pass

I lived within a stone's throw of Muizenberg for thirty years. There is no pass at Muizenberg. Fire up Google Earth and have a butcher's. The nature of the natural defensive position at Muizenberg is complex, with steep slopes to the west and an exposed sandy beach to the east. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captainbeefart (talk • contribs) 11:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Categories: