Misplaced Pages

Talk:Adobe Inc.: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:26, 28 October 2020 editDavemck (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users119,398 editsm rmv duplicate parm← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:59, 18 November 2024 edit undoOXYLYPSE (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,688 edits Rm nonsenseTag: 2017 wikitext editor 
(39 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old peer review|reviewedname=Adobe Systems|archive=1}}
{{Vital article|topic=Society|level=5|link=Misplaced Pages:Vital articles/Level/5/Society and social sciences|anchor=%7b%7banchor%7cComputing, electronics and software%7d%7d Computing, electronics and software (42 articles)|class=B
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Computer graphics|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Companies|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject California|importance=mid|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Typography|importance=low}}
}} }}
{{Archives|banner=yes|age=90|bot=ClueBot III}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Adobe Inc./Archive|format= %%i|age=2160|<!--90 days-->|header={{automatic archive navigator}}|maxarchsize=100000|minkeepthreads=4|numberstart=1}}
{{WikiProject Computer graphics|class=B|importance=Mid}}
{{Refideas
{{WikiProject Computing|class=B|importance=high}}
| {{cite web |last1=Peterson |first1=Jake |title=Adobe Photoshop's New Terms of Service Demands the Right to Access Your Work |url=https://lifehacker.com/tech/photoshops-terms-of-service-demands-the-right-to-your-content |website=] |date=June 6, 2024}}
{{WikiProject Companies|class=B|importance=High}}
{{WikiProject California|class=B|importance=mid|sfba=yes|sfba-importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Apple Inc.
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = y
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = y
| b3 <!--Structure --> = y
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = y
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = y
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = y
|class=B|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Typography|class=B|importance=low}}
}} }}
{{Old peer review|reviewedname=Adobe Systems|archive=1}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Adobe Systems/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}}

== External links modified ==

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080603155243/http://blogs.adobe.com/acom/2008/06/welcome_to_acrobatcom_work_tog_1.html to http://blogs.adobe.com/acom/2008/06/welcome_to_acrobatcom_work_tog_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}

Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 19:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

== Semi-protected edit request on 16 October 2018 ==

{{edit semi-protected|Adobe Inc.|answered=yes}}
change shhuang 00:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> --] (]) 01:59, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

== Update Adobe Inc. Logo ==

Hi Wikipedians, I'm writing to request a logo update in Adobe Inc. Misplaced Pages page.


== Lawsuit ==
As Adobe has currently changed the design of the logo to https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Adobe_Corporate_Logo.png, please help to update the logo in Infobox from Adobe logo and wordmark (2017).svg to Adobe Corporate Logo.png. Thank you! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:19, 13 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I see no sign on Adobe's web site that they are changing the colors of their logo. I see no sign on Google News that they have announced such a change or that such a change has been noted by any of the design news web sites. Unless you can provide a citation to a reliable source for that information (see ] and ]), there is no need to change the logo in this article at this time. --] (]) 03:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
::And I take that back. The colors of the logo on the Adobe web site just changed this morning. Therefore, User:Shhuang123's proposed new logo now matches the one on the Adobe web site. I withdraw my opposition to the proposed logo update.
::It is highly unlikely you could have known that Adobe was about to change its logo unless you are either a current Adobe employee, officer, or director or have a close relationship to one. If that's true, you need to openly disclose that information under ]. If you had done so, I would not have opposed the proposed update, or I would have merely argued that it should be delayed until Adobe had actually updated its web site.--] (]) 19:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)


Adobe Inc. is currently getting sued by the United States Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-complaint-against-adobe-and-two-adobe-executives-alleged-violations ) Shouldn't this be added? ] (]) 02:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
::: Hi ], you are correct. Adobe has changed the logo on its website. Can you please use that as a source for the logo update?
::: For your information, I have declared myself as an Adobe employee in my user page https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Shhuang123 to avoid COI. Thank you! <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Should "incorporated in Delaware" be added in the first sentence? ==
::: Hi ], can you please let me know if I should update the logo or if anyone can help me update the logo? Thanks! shhuang 22:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== "Day Software" listed at ] ==
]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ]. The discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">]<sup>]</sup></span>''' 23:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


I noticed it has been reverted after I made a similar edit on Roblox Corporation. I'd like to open up discussion here to gather opinions, as this sentence is still in articles such as ] and ]. ] (]) 00:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
== Change Adobe Logo in InfoBox ==


:Tagging ] for relevant discussion. ] (]) 00:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi there Wikipedians,
::According to , "more than 60% of ] companies" and "more than 90% of U.S.-based companies that went public in 2021" are incorporated in Delaware. The article also points out why this is this is such an attractive choice. Furthermore, is almost double that of its population.
I wanted to say that I would like to change the Adobe Logo in InfoBox to this new logo :
::Because "big corporation incorporated in Delaware" is such a ubiquitous concept, while also being quite inconsequential for anything not law- or tax-related, this is hardly ever relevant to mention, especially in the lead or first sentence. I can see a "Litigation" section á la "Big Corp. was sued at the Court of Delaware, its place of incorporation, for ...", but not much else.
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/File:Adobe_Systems_logo_and_wordmark.svg ] (]) 16:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
::In both examples mentioned above, the source is either a financial document or an investor FAQ. I've also seen cases that link straight to the incorporation papers. None of these is a reliable, secondary source that somehow highlights why this is relevant to mention.
::Thereby, I stand by my prior opinion that this kind of info should be excluded unless it is highlighted by secondary sources. In fact, if mentioned without the appropriate context why so many companies are Delawarian, this might even be confusing to the reader and should therefore be actively avoided. ] &#91;]&#93; 06:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Thanks for your response. I also support the option of omitting it from the first sentence after thinking. This is definititely a stylistic consistency issue and it concerns a fair amount of articles (just search for "incorporated in Delaware").
:::I am also interested in a ] if this talk page does not garner enough discussion, given how many articles it concerns. ] (]) 08:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)


== Sorry for inconvenience and delay to joint the clips of adobe systems... ==
I withdraw this proposal as the proposed logo is old.


okay and thanks enough ] (]) 13:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you,
Ananjanphotoshopcreations ] (]) 16:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:59, 18 November 2024

Adobe Inc. received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconComputer graphics Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputing High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCompanies High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconCalifornia: San Francisco Bay Area Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as High-importance).
WikiProject iconApple Inc. Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTypography Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives: Index 1


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Lawsuit

Adobe Inc. is currently getting sued by the United States Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission. (https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/united-states-files-complaint-against-adobe-and-two-adobe-executives-alleged-violations ) Shouldn't this be added? Azenoc (talk) 02:53, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Should "incorporated in Delaware" be added in the first sentence?

I noticed it has been reverted after I made a similar edit on Roblox Corporation. I'd like to open up discussion here to gather opinions, as this sentence is still in articles such as Intel and Nvidia. 333fortheain (talk) 00:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Tagging User:IceWelder for relevant discussion. 333fortheain (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
According to CNBC, "more than 60% of Fortune 500 companies" and "more than 90% of U.S.-based companies that went public in 2021" are incorporated in Delaware. The article also points out why this is this is such an attractive choice. Furthermore, the number of corporations in the state is almost double that of its population.
Because "big corporation incorporated in Delaware" is such a ubiquitous concept, while also being quite inconsequential for anything not law- or tax-related, this is hardly ever relevant to mention, especially in the lead or first sentence. I can see a "Litigation" section á la "Big Corp. was sued at the Court of Delaware, its place of incorporation, for ...", but not much else.
In both examples mentioned above, the source is either a financial document or an investor FAQ. I've also seen cases that link straight to the incorporation papers. None of these is a reliable, secondary source that somehow highlights why this is relevant to mention.
Thereby, I stand by my prior opinion that this kind of info should be excluded unless it is highlighted by secondary sources. In fact, if mentioned without the appropriate context why so many companies are Delawarian, this might even be confusing to the reader and should therefore be actively avoided. IceWelder 06:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. I also support the option of omitting it from the first sentence after thinking. This is definititely a stylistic consistency issue and it concerns a fair amount of articles (just search for "incorporated in Delaware").
I am also interested in a WP:RFC if this talk page does not garner enough discussion, given how many articles it concerns. 333fortheain (talk) 08:17, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for inconvenience and delay to joint the clips of adobe systems...

okay and thanks enough 2409:4070:431B:768F:0:0:16E:D8B0 (talk) 13:34, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Categories: