Revision as of 10:57, 17 December 2020 editAndrew Davidson (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers43,600 edits keep← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:36, 23 December 2020 edit undoGeschichte (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users130,230 edits close, keep | ||
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''keep'''. ] (]) 16:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} | |||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
Line 11: | Line 17: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 22:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 22:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Keep''' At Misplaced Pages, we could wait until a person is dead and then start with their obituaries, covering their entire life. We wouldn't have BLP problems then but the subject here might upset such a scheme, eh? She gets plenty of coverage in sources such as the '''' and '''' and it's |
*'''Keep''' At Misplaced Pages, we could wait until a person is dead and then start with their obituaries, covering their entire life. We wouldn't have BLP problems then but the subject here might upset such a scheme, eh? She gets plenty of coverage in sources such as the '''' and '''' and it's not just about money. ]🐉(]) 10:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep''' per ]. Per cited ] lead, "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be 'worthy of notice' or 'note'—that is, remarkable' or 'significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded'. Woman venture capitalist marks all of those. ] (]) 14:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
*'''Keep''' - Handily passes GNG. ] (]) 04:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
*'''Weak keep''' Seems to have enough independant coverage. -] (]) 09:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
*'''Keep''' - Passes GNG; sufficient independent sources covering her achievements. ] (]) 23:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
*'''Keep:''' Agreed and I think we now have consensus. - ] (]) 15:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{clear}} | |||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 16:36, 23 December 2020
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Laura Deming
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Laura Deming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another person with a job article that does not meet the criteria of WP:BIO. She's been profiled a few times as an investor, and that's really it. At best, WP:TOOSOON. FalconK (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 22:43, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep At Misplaced Pages, we could wait until a person is dead and then start with their obituaries, covering their entire life. We wouldn't have BLP problems then but the subject here might upset such a scheme, eh? She gets plenty of coverage in sources such as the FT and Sunday Times and it's not just about money. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GNG. Per cited WP:BIO lead, "For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be 'worthy of notice' or 'note'—that is, remarkable' or 'significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded'. Woman venture capitalist marks all of those. Forbes ref Hmlarson (talk) 14:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Handily passes GNG. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
- Weak keep Seems to have enough independant coverage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes GNG; sufficient independent sources covering her achievements. MurielMary (talk) 23:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Agreed and I think we now have consensus. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.