| Revision as of 05:21, 25 January 2010 editKenWalker (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,840 edits →Smithers BC: reply about sources← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:39, 25 January 2010 edit undoNW557Bot (talk | contribs)16,135 editsm →3RR: subst:'ing, | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| == 3RR == | == 3RR == | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- {{uw-3rr}} --> --<small>] | ]</small> 07:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{uw-3rr}} --<small>] | ]</small> 07:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:39, 25 January 2010
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Smithers BC
You talk about proof. The content you keep deleting from Smithers has sources cited. You, and another editor who was blocked for vandalism just before you opened your account, keep deleting that content. You say you live in Smithers and have access to the library. How about going in there and checking out the books that are cited as sources and then let us know whether they do or do not exist and support the claims made by the editors who have cited them. My guess is that you won't do that. --KenWalker | Talk 07:14, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- No need to send me a page from the telephone directory. It isn't up to me, there is nothing you have to prove to me. In any event, there being no synagogue in the telephone directory doesn't contradict anything in the article. What matters is whether there are sources for what is there. The article cites Shervill (a book which does exist and is likely in the Smithers library) and Meir (which lacks a title but could be searched in the name index at the library). If I was up there, I would see what they have at the library under those names and see whether they support the text based in the article. As it stands right now, assuming good faith means leaving it as it is. If you find out anything at the library, tell everyone about it at the article talk page and a consensus can be worked out about whether the section should stay and what it should say. --KenWalker | Talk 05:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --KenWalker | Talk 07:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)