| Revision as of 15:05, 13 January 2021 editMztourist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users72,114 edits →Alan B. Banister← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:08, 13 January 2021 edit undoMztourist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users72,114 edits →Alan B. BanisterNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Delete''' does not meet our inclusion criteria for soldiers.] (]) 14:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' does not meet our inclusion criteria for soldiers.] (]) 14:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Clearly meets the criteria of ] #2 as a flag officer, which ]. -- ] (]) 14:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Clearly meets the criteria of ] #2 as a flag officer, which ]. -- ] (]) 14:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| ::The consensus is that "significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources is non-negotiable; without this, a person is not notable and can't have an article." even if they meet one of the six presumptions under SOLDIER. ] (]) 15:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ::The consensus is that "significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources is non-negotiable; without this, a person is not notable and can't have an article." even if they meet one of the six presumptions under SOLDIER. You can add Hans Schwedler deleted yesterday to your list. ] (]) 15:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:08, 13 January 2021
Alan B. Banister
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Alan B. Banister (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. While his rank satisfies #2 of the SOLDIER ESSAY, he lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS, just being a Rear Admiral is not inherently notable without significant achievements/coverage Mztourist (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 14:50, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for soldiers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Clearly meets the criteria of WP:SOLDIER #2 as a flag officer, which consensus says makes him notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- The consensus is that "significant coverage in multiple verifiable independent, reliable sources is non-negotiable; without this, a person is not notable and can't have an article." even if they meet one of the six presumptions under SOLDIER. You can add Hans Schwedler deleted yesterday to your list. Mztourist (talk) 15:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)