Revision as of 07:35, 6 November 2004 edit24.18.188.41 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 21:14, 8 February 2005 edit undo70.81.12.8 (talk) →RedirectsNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
==Redirects== |
|
|
Why was ] redirected here? I think that there is a huge differnce between the ] of ] and the ] of people all over the ]. I for one do not support any sort of governmental rule, but agree with the claims of the movement to free Tibet and Tibetan people from China's rule. |
|
|
] 11:48, 2004 Sep 3 (UTC) |
|
|
:I have changed ] from a #REDIRECT to a real page. I have placed links to this page where appropriate. But more information on the movement itself is necessary, so if anyone is willing to contribute please do so. ] 11:10, 2004 Sep 6 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Why is ] redirected here? ] 04:20, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC) |
|
|
:I'm going to change it to the redirect to ]... unless somebody minds. {{User:Beta_m/sig}} |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
"retaining their ''freedom'' until the 1951 Chinese occupation." |
|
|
the word "freedom" is obviously loaded with a POV. How "free" (in today's sense) could a theocratic society based on serfdom be? Should the word "sovereignity" be used instead? |
|