| Revision as of 21:14, 8 February 2005 edit70.81.12.8 (talk) →Redirects← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:31, 9 February 2005 edit undoBeta m (talk | contribs)1,928 edits {{revert}}Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Redirects== | |||
| Why was ] redirected here? I think that there is a huge differnce between the ] of ] and the ] of people all over the ]. I for one do not support any sort of governmental rule, but agree with the claims of the movement to free Tibet and Tibetan people from China's rule. | |||
| ] 11:48, 2004 Sep 3 (UTC) | |||
| :I have changed ] from a #REDIRECT to a real page. I have placed links to this page where appropriate. But more information on the movement itself is necessary, so if anyone is willing to contribute please do so. ] 11:10, 2004 Sep 6 (UTC) | |||
| Why is ] redirected here? ] 04:20, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm going to change it to the redirect to ]... unless somebody minds. {{User:Beta_m/sig}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| "retaining their ''freedom'' until the 1951 Chinese occupation." | |||
| the word "freedom" is obviously loaded with a POV. How "free" (in today's sense) could a theocratic society based on serfdom be? Should the word "sovereignity" be used instead? | |||
Revision as of 13:31, 9 February 2005
Redirects
Why was Free Tibet movement redirected here? I think that there is a huge differnce between the government of Tibet and the movement of people all over the Earth. I for one do not support any sort of governmental rule, but agree with the claims of the movement to free Tibet and Tibetan people from China's rule. Beta m 11:48, 2004 Sep 3 (UTC)
- I have changed Free Tibet movement from a #REDIRECT to a real page. I have placed links to this page where appropriate. But more information on the movement itself is necessary, so if anyone is willing to contribute please do so. Beta m 11:10, 2004 Sep 6 (UTC)
Why is Tibet independence movement redirected here? Shorne 04:20, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I'm going to change it to the redirect to Free Tibet movement... unless somebody minds. Beta_M , | (Ë-Mail)
"retaining their freedom until the 1951 Chinese occupation." the word "freedom" is obviously loaded with a POV. How "free" (in today's sense) could a theocratic society based on serfdom be? Should the word "sovereignity" be used instead?