Revision as of 06:28, 17 January 2007 editGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot updating FAC template← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:16, 31 January 2007 edit undoSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,963 edits add WPR to articlehistory templateNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|action1=FAC |
|
|action1=WPR |
|
|action1date=20:17, 9 January 2007 |
|
|action1date=05:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC) |
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Battle of Edson's Ridge |
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Battle of Edson's Ridge |
|
|action1result=promoted |
|
|action1result=reviewed |
|
|action1oldid=98528913 |
|
|action1oldid=97487655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=FAC |
|
|
|action2date=20:17, 9 January 2007 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Battle of Edson's Ridge |
|
|
|action2result=promoted |
|
|
|action2oldid=98528913 |
|
|
|
|
|currentstatus=FA |
|
|currentstatus=FA |
|
}} |
|
}} |
Just a note to explain why I chose "Edson's Ridge" as the article name instead of "Bloody Ridge" or "The Ridge"...All three names are used about equally as titles for the battle in the available sources. I chose "Edson's Ridge" because it's the most unique of the three names. "Bloody Ridge" is also the name of a battle in the Korean War and "The Ridge," I thought, is too generic. Cla68 01:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)