| Revision as of 07:04, 17 January 2007 editGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot tagging closed FAC discussion← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:05, 17 January 2007 edit undoGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm moved Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/U2 to Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/U2/archive1: GimmeBot moving Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/U2 to Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/U2/archive1Next edit → | ||
| (No difference) | |||
Revision as of 07:05, 17 January 2007
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 20:17, 9 January 2007.
U2
A lot of work has been done on this one in the past weeks (references, pictures, cleanup). I think it is ready to be considered.Buc 18:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Object, just after a quick look-lead is too short and doesn't summarize the article, citation needed tags need to have refs found and made.Sumoeagle179 18:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: would like to see the fair use media files placed in context at appropriate points within the article, rather than in its own section. The JPS 19:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Funny, the excerpts are gone. Wiki-newbie 09:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak oppose because the "Campaigning" section really needs to be a couple of paragraphs, and not so listy. If not for that, I'd probably support. Tuf-Kat 04:27, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Misplaced Pages talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.