Misplaced Pages

User talk:RoySmith: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:01, 25 April 2021 editDYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators249,118 edits Giving DYK credit for Carlisle & Finch on behalf of Cwmhiraeth← Previous edit Revision as of 11:13, 25 April 2021 edit undoChipmunkdavis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,486 edits INTSF investigations: new sectionNext edit →
Line 86: Line 86:
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' used carbon-arc technology in both toy trains ''(example pictured)'' and military searchlights?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to ]. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ]. |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' used carbon-arc technology in both toy trains ''(example pictured)'' and military searchlights?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to ]. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC) }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

== INTSF investigations ==

Hi RoySmith, I understand there's a large SPI backlog, but regarding the ] cases, could action be quickly taken on the IP range including {{User|183.90.36.65}}? They've gone from the usual disruption to also following me to other articles . Best, ] (]) 11:13, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:13, 25 April 2021


Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64



This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.


Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Txbiassss

Hey Roy, I hope you're doing well. I just archived Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Txbiassss, and, immediately after archiving, realised that the case move was done as a section move as opposed to a case move, with the page history still living under a redirect at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/KIENGIR, which is otherwise empty. Not sure whether that was intentional (and if it wasn't, whether it needs fixing), but I thought I'd bring it up because it struck me as unusual and I'm not entirely sure what to do with it. Best, Blablubbs|talk 19:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Blablubbs, I suppose it should have been done as a case move. To be honest, however, I'm sure there are other clerks who are more expert at such process details than I am. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Blablubbs, I didn't give you a very good answer the first time. My apologies. What I was thinking was that if this was a brand new case, I would have moved the entire case, but since it was an existing case, I just moved the one section. Of course, it was really the one and only section. So, yeah, moving the entire case would probably have been the right thing to do. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
No worries, thanks for the explanation. :) Blablubbs|talk 18:05, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

April 21: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC with with Environmental focus

April 21, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC with Environmental focus
Welcome to Wikimedia New York City!

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page.

We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!

As this WikiWednesday is just the day before Earth Day, we will have an environmental focus.

If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or the talk page.

7:00pm - 8:00 pm online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms from 8:00-8:30)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

SPI

Hello – I started an SPI here. Did I do it correctly? It's the first SPI I've started, so let me know if there are any errors. – DarkGlow12:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

DarkGlow, It looks fine to me, thanks for filing it. I see you used Twinkle, which is good; that takes care of getting all the fidgetly formatting bits correct. This one looks like a no-brainer. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:36, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm experienced with Twinkle but had never used the SPI tool on it so I thought I'd try it, on like you said, a no-brainer. Thanks for checking it out! – DarkGlow12:38, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Tech News: 2021-16

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • Email to the Wikimedia wikis are handled by groups of Wikimedia editors. These volunteer response teams now use Znuny instead of OTRS. The functions and interface remain the same. The volunteer administrators will give more details about the next steps soon.
  • If you use syntax highlighting, you can see line numbers in the 2010 and 2017 wikitext editors when editing templates. This is to make it easier to see line breaks or talk about specific lines. Line numbers will soon come to all namespaces.
  • Advanced item Because of a technical change there could be problems with gadgets and scripts that have an edit summary area that looks similar to this one. If they look strange they should use mw.loader.using('mediawiki.action.edit.styles') to go back to how they looked before.
  • The latest version of MediaWiki came to the Wikimedia wikis last week. There was no Tech News issue last week.

Changes later this week

  • There is no new MediaWiki version this week.

Future changes

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress. This is for technical reasons. This is the technical name. It doesn't affect what you call the editors with this user right on your wiki. This is planned to happen in two weeks. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

16:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

March 2021 GAN Backlog drive

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thank you for completing 8 reviews in the March 2021 backlog drive. Your work helped us reduce the backlog by over 52%. Thank you specifically for your clear attention to detail and the resulting high quality review. Best, Eddie891 Work 13:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Carlisle & Finch

On 25 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carlisle & Finch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Carlisle & Finch used carbon-arc technology in both toy trains (example pictured) and military searchlights? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carlisle & Finch. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Carlisle & Finch), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

INTSF investigations

Hi RoySmith, I understand there's a large SPI backlog, but regarding the INTSF cases, could action be quickly taken on the IP range including 183.90.36.65 (talk · contribs)? They've gone from the usual disruption to also following me to other articles . Best, CMD (talk) 11:13, 25 April 2021 (UTC)