Misplaced Pages

:No disclaimers: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:37, 20 January 2007 editDreftymac (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,939 edits →Why they should not be used← Previous edit Revision as of 15:53, 16 March 2007 edit undoGracenotes (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,359 edits direct linkNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{guideline|]}} {{guideline|]}}


Rather frequently, someone proposes a new ] ] - for instance, ''"This article contains profanity"''. While the consensus is that these kinds of templates should not exist, the constant creation of new ones shows a need for a clearer exposition of why they should not be used. When spotted, such templates tend to be ] because they're similar to templates we've debated and deleted in the past. Rather frequently, someone proposes a new ] ] - for instance, ''"This article contains profanity"''. While the consensus is that these kinds of templates should not exist, the constant creation of new ones shows a need for a clearer exposition of why they should not be used. When spotted, such templates tend to be ] because they're similar to templates we've debated and deleted in the past.


==What are disclaimer templates== ==What are disclaimer templates==

Revision as of 15:53, 16 March 2007

Blue tickThis page documents an English Misplaced Pages ].
Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page.

]

Rather frequently, someone proposes a new disclaimer template - for instance, "This article contains profanity". While the consensus is that these kinds of templates should not exist, the constant creation of new ones shows a need for a clearer exposition of why they should not be used. When spotted, such templates tend to be speedily deleted because they're similar to templates we've debated and deleted in the past.

What are disclaimer templates

Disclaimer templates are templates that duplicate the information at one of the five disclaimer pages:

Why they should not be used

  • Redundant with the Disclaimer link at the end of every page.
  • Hard to define which articles should have a disclaimer (how would you define an "adult content" article, for instance, given that it varies dramatically by culture).
  • Misplaced Pages is not censored.
  • The lack of the disclaimer on certain pages as opposed to others might open Misplaced Pages to lawsuits.
  • By the time you see them, it's too late — the article has already been loaded.

Why people say they should be used

  • People might be upset to see some sort of information on Misplaced Pages. (For a discussion of this see WP:NOT Censored above)

The exception

Template:spoiler and related templates are the exceptions from this guideline, but this guideline does not make them compulsory. For the relevant guideline on spoiler warnings, see Misplaced Pages:Spoiler warning.

The only disclaimer on wikipedia should be the spoiler warnings, because you don't know where they are, and they ruin things for you. You can choose to ignore medical-related content on Misplaced Pages, but once you've read a spoiler, you can't just pretend you never read it. -Frazzydee|✍ 12:45, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
from Misplaced Pages:Templates for deletion/Log/Deleted/April 2005#Template:Medical

Previous discussions

A small list of previous discussions is at Misplaced Pages talk:Risk disclaimer#More disclaimer templates.

Some older discussion can be found at the top of Misplaced Pages talk:Risk disclaimer, or at the templates for deletion archives.

See also

Category: