Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Showbiz826: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:58, 10 May 2021 editAdamantine123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,935 edits Adding new report for Showbiz826.Tag: Twinkle← Previous edit Revision as of 12:28, 10 May 2021 edit undoRatnahastin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,066 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== ====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>

This has to be a joke the content is being removed from the article by other concerned user because its just so derogatory to the community. And secondly my and that alleged socks edits dont even match, and better discuss the dispute on talk page instead of filling a dubious report i can do the same, i even know whose you're a sockpuppet of.


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 12:28, 10 May 2021

Showbiz826

Showbiz826 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Showbiz826/Archive.

This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.



10 May 2021

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

The pattern is simple. Removal of same content from Rajput related pages. Interestingly, the another sock of the sockmaster did same edit

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This has to be a joke the content is being removed from the article by other concerned user because its just so derogatory to the community. And secondly my and that alleged socks edits dont even match, and better discuss the dispute on talk page instead of filling a dubious report i can do the same, i even know whose you're a sockpuppet of.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


Categories: