| Revision as of 12:28, 10 May 2021 editRatnahastin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,165 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:29, 10 May 2021 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Sikandar khan67 - ""Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> | ||
| This has to be a joke the content is being removed from the article by other concerned user because its just so derogatory to the community. And secondly my and that alleged socks edits dont even match, and better discuss the dispute on talk page instead of filling a dubious report i can do the same, i even know whose you're a sockpuppet of. | This has to be a joke the content is being removed from the article by other concerned user because its just so derogatory to the community. And secondly my and that alleged socks edits dont even match, and better discuss the dispute on talk page instead of filling a dubious report i can do the same, i even know whose you're a sockpuppet of. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 12:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== | ||
Revision as of 12:29, 10 May 2021
Showbiz826
Showbiz826 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Showbiz826/Archive.
This SPI case may involve cross-wiki abuse. Please consider reporting the results on Meta; checkusers can send an email to the interwiki checkuser mailing list if required.
10 May 2021
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Sikandar khan67 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
The pattern is simple. Removal of same content from Rajput related pages. Interestingly, the another sock of the sockmaster did same edit
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This has to be a joke the content is being removed from the article by other concerned user because its just so derogatory to the community. And secondly my and that alleged socks edits dont even match, and better discuss the dispute on talk page instead of filling a dubious report i can do the same, i even know whose you're a sockpuppet of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sikandar khan67 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: