| Revision as of 09:10, 15 May 2021 editCryptic (talk | contribs)Administrators41,591 editsm Reverted edits by Owlf (talk) to last version by Hazard-BotTag: Rollback← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:57, 31 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Added missing end tags to discussion close footer to reduce Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - nothing here of any significance. Fails ]. Author has been removing CSD tags and even the current AfD notice. <span style="background-color:lightblue">''''' ] '''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue"> <sup>''] Talk ''</sup> </span> 08:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - nothing here of any significance. Fails ]. Author has been removing CSD tags and even the current AfD notice. <span style="background-color:lightblue">''''' ] '''''</span><span style="background-color:lightblue"> <sup>''] Talk ''</sup> </span> 08:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Revision as of 04:57, 31 January 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 00:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Prakash Neupane
AfDs for this article:- Prakash Neupane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. The only sources listed on the article are self-promoting. Unable to find any substantive independent coverage of the subject. Nominated for Speedy in the past and previously listed at AfD with the result of softdelete due to lack of participation. Pax Verbum 04:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Comment More information is required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuuu1000 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Yuuuu1000: Can you be more specific? I feel like I listed the reasons clearly, and they are evident by looking at the article itself. Thank you! -Pax Verbum 21:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 14:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- revise I suggest that reliable media sources is provided like articles etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuuu1000 (talk • contribs) 11:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- This Person may be new to the field of Music. सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 04:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment: If this is true, and it seems that it is, that means they are likely not notable, and hence the above cited reasons for deletion, at least for now. -Pax Verbum 04:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- This Person may be new to the field of Music. सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 04:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, somewhat reluctantly, since Nepali musicians are not exactly over-represented on English Misplaced Pages. But the utter lack of independent sources, as well as the lack of any real claim to notability in the article, indicate that Prakash is not yet notable enough for an article. (That the photo of him is clearly a selfie doesn't exactly scream "notable" either.) --bonadea contributions talk 17:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per Misplaced Pages:Notability#General notability guideline. The article contains three sources: this article, this article, and this article. The websites are dubiously reliable and do not provide significant coverage about the subject. I searched for sources and was unable to find any sources that provided significant coverage about the subject.
No prejudice against recreation if new reliable sources surface that provide significant coverage of the subject.
- Delete as nothing at all close to actually satisfying any form of independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing here of any significance. Fails WP:GNG. Author has been removing CSD tags and even the current AfD notice. Velella 08:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.