| Revision as of 14:51, 22 January 2007 editExcavator (talk | contribs)121 edits restore {{Wikiproject Japan}} template; Vandalism by user:Tokyo Watcher← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:00, 22 January 2007 edit undoTokyo Watcher~enwiki (talk | contribs)1,350 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{WikiProject Japan|class=B|importance=low}} | |||
| == Quality and Importance == | == Quality and Importance == | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
| ::OK, I understand you can't show your editing is reasonable. However, this is not your web page. I believe <nowiki>{{Wikiproject Japan}}</nowiki> template should be restored.--] 14:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | ::OK, I understand you can't show your editing is reasonable. However, this is not your web page. I believe <nowiki>{{Wikiproject Japan}}</nowiki> template should be restored.--] 14:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| The evaluation of the template is arbitrary.You should not write down a personal opinion.15:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Page moved== | ==Page moved== | ||
Revision as of 15:00, 22 January 2007
Quality and Importance
Note the reason of appraisal standard01:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tokyo Watcher (talk • contribs) 01:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
- I don't know what you said but I guess what you wanted to say is probably that you'd like me to explain the reason of my reversion.
- Quality: before rating this as A-class, I believe that The article should pass through the Good article nomination process and be granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. (see Misplaced Pages:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment) GA-class is a preparative status for A-class and you can nominate this article for the good article. Please try it if you'd like to.
- Importance: Tsuki no Misaki is scarcely mensioned among Japanese. Even the fact that History of Minato-distinct (the Japanese title is Minato-ku shi, officially compiled by Minato-ku) describes it very shortly can be a good reason why it is rated as low-importance.
- --Excavator 18:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- There is no ?-class on the quality scale of the grading scheme, and there is also neither evidence nor reference showing Tsuki no Misaki is highly important. Can you explain the intention of your editing? --Excavator 13:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I understand you can't show your editing is reasonable. However, this is not your web page. I believe {{Wikiproject Japan}} template should be restored.--Excavator 14:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
The evaluation of the template is arbitrary.You should not write down a personal opinion.15:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Page moved
Page move from Tuki no Misaki. Reason for move: Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles) specifies modified Hepburn romanization. The modified Hepburn romanization is tsu rather than tu. Fg2 12:30, Jun 11, 2005 (UTC)