Revision as of 18:59, 26 May 2021 editAlwaysasn (talk | contribs)53 edits →Per the above, you may not edit Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:01, 26 May 2021 edit undoDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Oversighters, Administrators263,788 edits →Per the above, you may not edit Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry: vNext edit → | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
Although you can use the talk page. ] ] 18:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | Although you can use the talk page. ] ] 18:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
:{{u|Doug Weller}}, The notice on the talk page say portion, either change the notice and ECP it or leave it as it is as the pseudoscience dispute doesn't belong directly to the conflict. I personally don't care either way but I prefer some certainty ] (]) 18:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | :{{u|Doug Weller}}, The notice on the talk page say portion, either change the notice and ECP it or leave it as it is as the pseudoscience dispute doesn't belong directly to the conflict. I personally don't care either way but I prefer some certainty ] (]) 18:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
::{{re|Shrike}} no time now, I'll sort it out tomorrow. Meanwhile Alwaysasn it's not going to hurt you to wait. ] ] 19:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:01, 26 May 2021
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 7)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: This submission has been declined for one or more of the following reasons:- It is primarily designed to threaten, disparage or attack its subject.
- It is a biography of a living person that is unreferenced and entirely negative in tone.
- It is a page that is purely vandalistic in nature.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Alwaysasn/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Alwaysasn, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:39, 7 February 2015 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: NYX Technologies (December 17)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NYX Technologies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NYX Technologies, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Discretionary sanctions for the Arab-Israeli dispute area
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 18:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
You must follow these page-specific restrictions until you have 500 edits and have been here 30 days
For the purposes of editing restrictions in the ARBPIA topic area, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as encompassing
- the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted ("primary articles"), and
- edits relating to the Arab-Israeli conflict, to pages and discussions in all namespaces with the exception of userspace ("related content")
Also,
500/30 Rule: All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. On primary articles, this prohibition is preferably to be enforced by use of extended confirmed protection (ECP) but this is not mandatory. On pages with related content, or on primary articles where ECP is not feasible, the 500/30 Rule may be enforced by other methods, including page protection, reverts, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters. Reverts made solely to enforce the 500/30 Rule are not considered edit warring.
The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:
1. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the methods noted in paragraph b). This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, RfCs, noticeboard discussions, etc.
2. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required. Doug Weller talk 18:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC) 3. One Revert Restriction (1RR): Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict. Reverts made to enforce the 500/30 Rule are exempt from the provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator.
Note that this means your edits on such pages (which you aren't yet eligible to make) may be reverted by anyone at any time. These restrictions are stricter than those in most other areas because of the problems that we've had in this area. Doug Weller talk 18:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Per the above, you may not edit Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry
Although you can use the talk page. Doug Weller talk 18:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Doug Weller, The notice on the talk page say portion, either change the notice and ECP it or leave it as it is as the pseudoscience dispute doesn't belong directly to the conflict. I personally don't care either way but I prefer some certainty Shrike (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Shrike: no time now, I'll sort it out tomorrow. Meanwhile Alwaysasn it's not going to hurt you to wait. Doug Weller talk 19:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Khazar Theory has nothing to do with the Israeli and Palestinian conflict. It is a theory directly aimed at European Ashkenazi Jews, and I should not be blocked from edits with supporting sources on this topic.