| Revision as of 12:30, 15 June 2021 editSerial Number 54129 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,435 edits Warning: Edit warring on Talk:Tom Brady.Tags: Twinkle Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:10, 16 June 2021 edit undoBlueMoonset (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers72,553 edits →June 2021: why the GA nomination was revertedTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to ] on that page. This isn't done to ]. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ]] 12:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC) | If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to ] on that page. This isn't done to ]. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ]] 12:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| :Modern NFL Historian, please note that per the GA nomination instructions, {{tq|Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.}} You have not made any contributions to the article nor consulted with significant contributors to it, which is why your nominations have been reverted. | |||
| :If you believe the ] article meets the ] and is ready for nomination, you need first to do the consultation by posting a request to ] and allowing seven days for responses to accumulate. If there is then a consensus that the article is ready, and if you are prepared to work on edits to the article during the GA review process, you can make a nomination once the consultation process is over. ] (]) 03:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:10, 16 June 2021
Test
June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Talk:Tom Brady. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ——Serial 12:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Modern NFL Historian, please note that per the GA nomination instructions,
Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.
You have not made any contributions to the article nor consulted with significant contributors to it, which is why your nominations have been reverted. - If you believe the Tom Brady article meets the GA criteria and is ready for nomination, you need first to do the consultation by posting a request to Talk:Tom Brady and allowing seven days for responses to accumulate. If there is then a consensus that the article is ready, and if you are prepared to work on edits to the article during the GA review process, you can make a nomination once the consultation process is over. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)