Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:11, 6 July 2021 editDavemck (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users119,398 editsm renumber duplicate parm← Previous edit Revision as of 12:16, 26 June 2022 edit undoTheJoebro64 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,903 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 61: Line 61:
{{WikiProject Video games|class=GA|importance=high|Nintendo=yes}} {{WikiProject Video games|class=GA|importance=high|Nintendo=yes}}
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=GA|category=Everydaylife}} {{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|class=GA|category=Everydaylife}}
}}
{{refideas
|1=https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/miyamoto-initially-cringed-at-wind-wakers-art-style-and-asked-for-a-redesign-its-claimed/
}} }}


Revision as of 12:16, 26 June 2022

Template:Vital article

Former featured articleThe Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleThe Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 26, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 5, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
February 2, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
February 9, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
July 14, 2006Featured article reviewKept
May 4, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
March 31, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
May 15, 2012Featured article reviewDemoted
July 18, 2017Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconVideo games: Nintendo High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks
AfDs Merge discussions Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Good article nominations DYK nominations Reviews and reassessments
Articles that need...
Template:WP1.0
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Archives
Archive 1

Intro edits

I've twice reverted parts of the recent edits to the introduction. The reason is that the previous version read better than the changes. Specifically:

  • The following sentence is phrased awkwardly: "The element of wind has a prominent role, by facilitating sailing and being controlled with a magic conductor's baton called the Wind Waker."
  • The following sentence introduces passive voice: "Instead, a distinctive cartoon-like art style was created through cel shading, originating the 'Toon Link' character." (I also don't think the sentence benefits from being broken up).
  • Calling the art direction "whimsical": I don't think this is the right word choice. At any rate the previous paragraph already establishes what the art direction is like.
  • The article verifies that the divisiveness among North American players contributed to weaker sales in comparison to Ocarina of Time, in fact this is a pretty significant part of the game's history. Removing that hurts the flow.
  • "As a result, the subsequent Twilight Princess (2006) has a more natural and serious look." This doesn't flow right. As a result of what exactly? As a result of comparatively weak sales, Nintendo changed directions with the visuals. As a result of that decision, Twilight Princess has a more realistic style (I don't think that "natural and serious" are the right word choices)
  • Splitting the sentence on the character's allies and activities strikes me as unnecessary, but I'm open to this if others support the change.

There are some good changes that I'll restore, and others that should be made. In general this introduction has suffered from content creep over the years; I'll get to work on fixing that.--Cúchullain /c 20:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Would this still classify as GameCube-Only?

I'm aware that the two versions (OG and HD) have separate articles, but at the end of the day they're the same game at its core. Pages where the remasters are merged with the original game (Xenoblade Chronicles (video game) and Skies of Arcadia) don't have either marked as exclusive for their respective consoles (Xenoblade's remaster in particular has WAY more identity than Wind Waker's in my eyes). I could totally be wrong with this thinking, and if I am, I'd appreciate a link to Misplaced Pages's policies on remakes (if such a page even exists). Thanks for reading! | NJ (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Categories: