Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/LIGerasimova: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:36, 15 February 2005 editAynabend (talk | contribs)306 edits Evidence of disputed behavior← Previous edit Revision as of 14:57, 16 February 2005 edit undoTabib (talk | contribs)1,162 edits Putting notice on two person threshold. Maybe now this petition will be finally approved...Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
In order to remain listed at ], at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the ''same'' dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 21:16, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: <tt>{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)</tt>.
----
== Statement of the dispute == == Statement of the dispute ==
] is engaged in a continuous and deliberate personal attacks and false accusations on ]. She spends most of her time attacking other editors (esp. Tabib) in often crude personal terms and provoking conflicts between users. ] is engaged in a continuous and deliberate personal attacks and false accusations on ]. She spends most of her time attacking other editors (esp. Tabib) in often crude personal terms and provoking conflicts between users.

Revision as of 14:57, 16 February 2005

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 21:16, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 10:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC).


Statement of the dispute

LIGerasimova is engaged in a continuous and deliberate personal attacks and false accusations on Tabib. She spends most of her time attacking other editors (esp. Tabib) in often crude personal terms and provoking conflicts between users.

Description

User LIGerasimova suddenly appeared in Misplaced Pages on Feb 9, 2005 in the midst of hot disputes between Tabib and user Pantherarosa over the content of the Safavids page. From the very first day LIGerasimova distinguished herself by aggressively attacking other editors and accusing them in POV, promotion of "Turkish propaganda" and establishing a "Turkish mafia". Interestingly, user LIGerasimova claimed that she was a neutral third party and came to the discussion after Tabib's call for mediation. However, after viewing LIGerasimova's contribution log it is hardly convincing, which makes one think that she has some hidden intentions. See, Tabib's talkpage for details. Moreover, according to LIGerasimova's contribution log, she spent almost all of her time attacking other editors. Her attacks and insults continued even though other editors largely ignored her attacks and avoided responding to her groundless accusations.

For details see, user Tabib's talkpage and to a lesser degree Safavids talkpage.

Thanks for twisting facts again, and again (ad nauseam??) Instead of whining into everybody's ears, stic to ethical conduct!--LIGerasimova 12:31, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Evidence of disputed behavior

(provide diffs and links)

  1. Personal insults based on editor's national/ethnic background
  2. False accusations on creating a "Turkish mafia"
  3. False accusations of vandalism
  4. Labelling other user "sock-puppet"

Applicable policies

  1. Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

  1. Attempt at warning user of disruptive behavior , , ,
  2. Attempt at warning user about irrelevant taunts on Talk pages

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

  1. --Tabib 15:49, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

2. --Ulvi I. 23:32, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~~~~~~~~~)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.

Category: