Misplaced Pages

User:JL-Bot/Questionable.cfg/General: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:JL-Bot | Questionable.cfg Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:32, 12 August 2021 editJL-Bot (talk | contribs)Bots561,106 edits updating Misplaced Pages citation configuration based on DOI redirects← Previous edit Revision as of 00:16, 15 September 2021 edit undoHeadbomb (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors454,078 edits Unreliable fields: +Category:Race and intelligence controversyNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
{{JCW-selected|Superseded theories in science|Category:Aether theories|Category:Animal magnetism|Category:Classical elements|Category:Early scientific cosmologies|Category:Eclectic medicine|Category:Humorism|Category:Lamarckism|Category:Mutationism|Category:Obsolete biological theories|Category:Obsolete geological theories|Category:Obsolete immunology theories|Category:Obsolete medical theories|Category:Orthogenesis|Category:Phrenologists|Category:Phrenology|Category:Physiognomists|Category:Physiognomy|Category:Scientific racism|Category:Vitalism|Category:Vitalists|Category:Wu Xing|source=URF}} {{JCW-selected|Superseded theories in science|Category:Aether theories|Category:Animal magnetism|Category:Classical elements|Category:Early scientific cosmologies|Category:Eclectic medicine|Category:Humorism|Category:Lamarckism|Category:Mutationism|Category:Obsolete biological theories|Category:Obsolete geological theories|Category:Obsolete immunology theories|Category:Obsolete medical theories|Category:Orthogenesis|Category:Phrenologists|Category:Phrenology|Category:Physiognomists|Category:Physiognomy|Category:Scientific racism|Category:Vitalism|Category:Vitalists|Category:Wu Xing|source=URF}}
{{JCW-selected|Tabloid journalism|Category:National Enquirer|Category:Supermarket tabloids|source=URF}} {{JCW-selected|Tabloid journalism|Category:National Enquirer|Category:Supermarket tabloids|source=URF}}
{{JCW-selected|Ufology|Category:Alien abduction|Category:Alien abduction reports|Category:Alleged UFO-related entities|Category:Alleged UFO-related aviation incidents|Category:American UFO writers|Category:Contactees|Category:Foo fighter (phenomenon)|Category:Fourth International Posadist|Category:Government responses to UFOs|Category:Mothman|Category:People associated with ufology|Category:Roswell incident|Category:UFO conspiracy theorists|Category:UFO crashes|Category:UFO culture|Category:UFO hoaxes|Category:UFO sightings|Category:UFO sightings in England|Category:UFO sightings in Scotland|Category:UFO sightings in Wales|Category:UFO sightings in the United Kingdom|Category:UFO sightings in the United States|Category:UFO writers|Category:UFO-related events|Category:UFO-related lists|Category:UFO-related phenomena|Category:Ufologists|Category:Ufology|Category:Unidentified flying objects|source=URF}} {{JCW-selected|Ufology|Category:Alien abduction|Category:Alien abduction reports|Category:Alleged UFO-related entities|Category:Alleged UFO-related aviation incidents|Category:American UFO writers|Category:Contactees|Category:Foo fighter (phenomenon)|Category:Fourth International Posadist|Category:Government responses to UFOs|Category:Mothman|Category:People associated with ufology|Category:Roswell incident|Category:UFO conspiracy theorists|Category:UFO crashes|Category:UFO culture|Category:UFO hoaxes|Category:UFO sightings|Category:UFO sightings in England|Category:UFO sightings in Scotland|Category:UFO sightings in Wales|Category:UFO sightings in the United Kingdom|Category:UFO sightings in the United States|Category:UFO writers|Category:UFO-related events|Category:UFO-related lists|Category:UFO-related phenomena|Category:Ufologists|Category:Ufology|Category:Unidentified flying objects|Category:Race and intelligence controversy|source=URF}}
{{div col end}} {{div col end}}



Revision as of 00:16, 15 September 2021

This page features complex syntax that interacts with User:JL-Bot in tricky ways to produce the WP:CITEWATCH compilation. If you're not familiar with this page or JL-Bot, discuss improvements and suggestions on the talk page.
Disclaimer / Warning Shortcut

This is the setup page of The Misplaced Pages CiteWatch, a bot-compiled listing of potentially cargo cult, conspiracist, denialist, fake, junk, not even wrong, obsolete, predatory, pseudoscientific, quack, or otherwise unreliable publications cited by Misplaced Pages through the |journal= parameter of citation templates (see this Signpost article for details). It is based on several lists of unreliable or questionable publications (such as those compiled by Jeffrey Beall, the University Grants Commission, Quackwatch, or Misplaced Pages editors). See Q9 in the FAQ for the update schedule.

This list is a starting point to detect unreliable sources which are cited by Misplaced Pages, but it does not answer whether it is appropriate to cite them. Due to the somewhat arbitrary nature of what exactly constitutes an unreliable source, as well as imperfect matching algorithms, the list may feature publications and publishers which...

  1. are flat-out promoting pseudo/junk scholarship or quackery
  2. are flat-out predatory/vanity venues, with sham peer-review processes
  3. were once-reliable, but have since been acquired by predatory publishers
  4. were once-unreliable, but no longer engage in problematic practices
  5. reflect the sources' good but imperfect judgment of what is unreliable
  6. are problematic in some areas (e.g. pseudoscience), but reliable in others (e.g. news)
  7. are problematic in some other way (e.g. circular references, or deprecated sources)
  8. are problematic but used in an acceptable manner (e.g. primary sources about frauds)
  9. are misclassified because of a spelling variation (red links especially)
  10. are misclassified because of false positives, miscategorization, or flawed bot logic
  11. are reliable, but share names with imposter publications and publishers
  12. are about pseudoscholarship as a topic, rather than being pseudoscholarly themselves

While many, if not most, publications and publishers on this list have some questionable aspects to their publishing practices, these can still be reliable (or be otherwise acceptable) in limited circumstances. The CiteWatch cannot determine the full context in which a source is used, therefore use common sense and judgement before removing a citation from an article (see Q8 in the FAQ). When in doubt, discuss things on the article's talk page or at the reliable sources noticeboard – especially before a mass purge of a source. The Unreliable/Predatory Source Detector user script may also interest you.

Additions and removals from the listing – including false positives – can be discussed at WT:CITEWATCH. False positives can also be directly handled at WP:JCW/EXCLUDE.
Skip to top Skip to bottom
Journals Cited by Misplaced Pages
Alphabetical
WP:JCW/ALPHA (t)
By DOI prefixes
WP:JCW/DOI (t)
Most popular entries
WP:JCW/POP (t)
Most popular entries (missing)
WP:JCW/MIS (t)
Most popular publisher
WP:JCW/PUB (t)
Most popular targets
WP:JCW/TAR (t)
Maintenance
WP:JCW/MAINT (t)
Potentially unreliable
WP:CITEWATCH (t)
Other efforts
See also
Related pages
Bots
CiteWatch Setup Table of Contents
Overview Disclaimer Syntax Sources
/General Unreliable fields Mirrors and forks Self-published Unpublished Hijacked WP:RSP
/Publishers Misc A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
/Journals Misc A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Note: Many entries on these lists will be things that should not normally in found in a |journal= parameter. They are included for two main reasons:

  1. poor template usage – for example, if a website/publisher is put in a journal parameter by mistake (|journal=UnreliableWebsite.com) these will be picked up
  2. redirect detection – oftentimes Misplaced Pages will not have an article about a specific journal, but it will have a redirect to its publisher (Unreliable Journal → Foo Society of Nonsense) or some other relevant article (Unreliable Journal → Founding editor)

Unreliable fields

Note: Most of these categories don't contain publications themselves, but are listed so that publications that redirect to unreliable people and organizations (e.g. Progress in Complexity, Information, and DesignInternational Society for Complexity, Information, and Design) get included in the compilation.

  • Creationism
    • .*Creation Sci.*
    • .*Baramin.*
    • Intelligent Design.*
    • .*Young Earth.*

Mirrors and forks

Self-published

Unpublished

  • Unpublished
    • .*Accepted.*
    • .*In Press.*
    • .*Forthcoming.*
    • .*Submitted.*
    • .*To appear.*
    • .*To be published.*
    • .*Unpublished.*
    • !Penguin Press!

WP:RSP

Hijacked journals

Hijacked journals are journals whose "websites or branding have been co-opted by a predatory journal or publisher". Meaning that these are legitimate publications, but with fraudsters posing as them.

Category: