Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/CTeen (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:17, 3 September 2021 editWinchester2313 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,763 edits CTeen: opinion← Previous edit Revision as of 20:56, 7 September 2021 edit undoSeddon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators11,036 edits Relisting discussion (XFDcloser)Next edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
</div> </div>
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
:{{la|1=CTeen}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) :{{la|1=CTeen}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>)
:({{Find sources AFD|title=CTeen}}) :({{Find sources AFD|title=CTeen}})
Article is written like a promotional advertisement. Many of the references are primary and in-house promotion of their programs e.g., suicide prevention, learning of Torah. Nothing to indicate notability outside of Chabad. ] (]) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC) Article is written like a promotional advertisement. Many of the references are primary and in-house promotion of their programs e.g., suicide prevention, learning of Torah. Nothing to indicate notability outside of Chabad. ] (]) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Line 15: Line 15:


I agree that the page in it's present form needs a lot of work, but there are clearly enough general media references to meet the ] standard, as well as merit it's own page. I will try and improve the substance and format when I find some time, but meanwhile feel it should stay. ] (]) 18:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC) I agree that the page in it's present form needs a lot of work, but there are clearly enough general media references to meet the ] standard, as well as merit it's own page. I will try and improve the substance and format when I find some time, but meanwhile feel it should stay. ] (]) 18:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 20:56, 7 September 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>]</noinclude></div>

Revision as of 20:56, 7 September 2021

CTeen

AfDs for this article:

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

CTeen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written like a promotional advertisement. Many of the references are primary and in-house promotion of their programs e.g., suicide prevention, learning of Torah. Nothing to indicate notability outside of Chabad. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

I disagree and think it should be left for a while to see how it develops. It definitely needs more work but there are plenty of reliable sources for the information in this page from mainstream press sources outside Chabad.Londoner77 (talk) 02:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Whiteguru (talk) 19:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

I agree that the page in it's present form needs a lot of work, but there are clearly enough general media references to meet the WP:NOTABILITY standard, as well as merit it's own page. I will try and improve the substance and format when I find some time, but meanwhile feel it should stay. Winchester2313 (talk) 18:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seddon 20:56, 7 September 2021 (UTC) Categories: