| Revision as of 00:40, 14 September 2021 editSangdeboeuf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users53,308 edits Caution: Using talk page as forum on Talk:Woke.Tags: Twinkle Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:48, 16 September 2021 edit undoSangdeboeuf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users53,308 edits Warning: Edit warring on Woke.Tags: Twinkle RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| ] Please refrain from using talk pages such as ] for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on ] and the project ]; they are ]. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting ] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See ] for more information. ''{{pb}}Talk pages are not the place to argue your personal point of view over whether "wokeness" is "extreme" or "fringe". Please try to stay on the topic of improving the article. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-chat2 --> ] (]) 00:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC) | ] Please refrain from using talk pages such as ] for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on ] and the project ]; they are ]. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting ] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See ] for more information. ''{{pb}}Talk pages are not the place to argue your personal point of view over whether "wokeness" is "extreme" or "fringe". Please try to stay on the topic of improving the article. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-chat2 --> ] (]) 00:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' ''{{pb}}Please stop inserting your blatant misinterpretation of Applebaum's essay. It has been explained numerous times on the talk page why it doesn't belong in the article. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 20:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:48, 16 September 2021
 Archives (index) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Will this work? As far as I can tell, there isn't a colored version in Russian, but it's alright. Thanks so much by the way
censorship
Note this reversion, http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Anthony_Weiner&diff=432926151&oldid=432926091 which leaves out THE essential item of the entire incident μηδείς (talk)
Nomination of Etch-a-sketch gaffe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Etch-a-sketch gaffe is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Etch-a-sketch gaffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
A page you started (Tech4Good awards) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Tech4Good awards, Hodgdon's secret garden!
Misplaced Pages editor Dicklyon just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Good start. I adjust caps per MOS:CAPS and the cited source.
To reply, leave a comment on Dicklyon's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
PROD
Content not contributor
Hi there! I am here to ask that you focus on content and not contributors. We'll all benefit if you make your points at Talk:Woke without unnecessarily personalizing the debate by (for example) associating the status quo with some Orwellian "editing regime" led by Sangdebouef. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 22:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- Was about to post a warning about personal attacks here as well, but the above serves the same purpose. I've removed HSG's "Orwellian" comments to save them the embarrassment of having to do it themselves. If this escalates I may have to take it to WP:AE. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hodgdon's secret garden, please delete the second line of your latest edit. Talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles, not snarkily insulting other users. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 18:36, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Communication style
Hogdon's secret garden, I really don't know what you're argument at Talk:Woke even is anymore. I see you've quoted an impressive amount of copyrighted material, much of which has nothing to do with woke. Could you please stop? I don't know if your conduct here quite matches that described at WP:BLUDGEON, but the disruptive effect is very similar. Can I recommend, instead, drafting some content in your sandbox, sourced to the most reliable and on-topic sources you can find? I'd be happy to review it when you feel it's ready. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 02:23, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Woke for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information.
Talk pages are not the place to argue your personal point of view over whether "wokeness" is "extreme" or "fringe". Please try to stay on the topic of improving the article. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Woke. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop inserting your blatant misinterpretation of Applebaum's essay. It has been explained numerous times on the talk page why it doesn't belong in the article. Thank you. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)