Revision as of 00:52, 22 September 2021 editAnachronist (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators67,308 edits →Biblical Archaeology Review: changed to redirect← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:29, 22 September 2021 edit undoAnonMoos (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers71,937 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
:{{la|1=Biblical Archaeology Review}} |
:{{la|1=Biblical Archaeology Review}} - (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Biblical Archaeology Review}}) | :({{Find sources AFD|title=Biblical Archaeology Review}}) | ||
Seems to fail ]. Though it has a high circulation, this is among ideologues and so ] applies here. Is it identified as a notable fringe journal? I do not see that as being the case. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC) | Seems to fail ]. Though it has a high circulation, this is among ideologues and so ] applies here. Is it identified as a notable fringe journal? I do not see that as being the case. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)</small> | ||
* '''Redirect''' to ]. After hunting through Google Scholar, I couldn't find that this journal gets cited much. Not notable, although its founder might be based on significant coverage. ~] <small>(])</small> 00:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC) | * '''Redirect''' to ]. After hunting through Google Scholar, I couldn't find that this journal gets cited much. Not notable, although its founder might be based on significant coverage. ~] <small>(])</small> 00:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC) | ||
:'''Keep''' -- What is "among ideologues" supposed to mean in this context?? The purpose is to present archaeological research related to things Biblical to a non-specialist audience, and it's achieved a fair degree of success doing it (not to mention it's role in usealing the Dead Sea Scrolls etc.). It's a lot like "National Geographic", "Scientific American" etc. (though with a more limited audience). ] (]) 03:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:29, 22 September 2021
Biblical Archaeology Review
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Biblical Archaeology Review (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:NJOURNAL. Though it has a high circulation, this is among ideologues and so WP:FRINGE applies here. Is it identified as a notable fringe journal? I do not see that as being the case. jps (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Archaeology-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Hershel Shanks. After hunting through Google Scholar, I couldn't find that this journal gets cited much. Not notable, although its founder might be based on significant coverage. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep -- What is "among ideologues" supposed to mean in this context?? The purpose is to present archaeological research related to things Biblical to a non-specialist audience, and it's achieved a fair degree of success doing it (not to mention it's role in usealing the Dead Sea Scrolls etc.). It's a lot like "National Geographic", "Scientific American" etc. (though with a more limited audience). AnonMoos (talk) 03:29, 22 September 2021 (UTC)