| Revision as of 16:15, 2 February 2007 edit66.28.20.178 (talk) →Lattice Semiconductor← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:35, 2 February 2007 edit undoDfmcp (talk | contribs)76 edits Keep articleNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :{{la|Lattice Semiconductor}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Lattice Semiconductor}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
| '''Delete'''. On the one hand it's a public company, but the article does fail to meet notability requirements, and reads like wikispam. In it's current form I recommend deletion, but given that it's a public company maybe a re-write could save the article? ] 14:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | '''Delete'''. On the one hand it's a public company, but the article does fail to meet notability requirements, and reads like wikispam. In it's current form I recommend deletion, but given that it's a public company maybe a re-write could save the article? ] 14:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Hi Tom... Hmm.. Do you '''really''' want to delete the Lattice Semi's article? In my mind Lattice are one of only four genuinely successful ] vendors worldwide (I think the other three on that list should be ], ], ]). Certainly the Lattice article is poorly written at the moment, but deletion is absolutely not the answer. '''Keep the article'''. | |||
Revision as of 18:35, 2 February 2007
Lattice Semiconductor
- Lattice Semiconductor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete. On the one hand it's a public company, but the article does fail to meet notability requirements, and reads like wikispam. In it's current form I recommend deletion, but given that it's a public company maybe a re-write could save the article? Tomstdenis 14:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi Tom... Hmm.. Do you really want to delete the Lattice Semi's article? In my mind Lattice are one of only four genuinely successful FPGA vendors worldwide (I think the other three on that list should be Altera, Xilinx, Alcatel). Certainly the Lattice article is poorly written at the moment, but deletion is absolutely not the answer. Keep the article.
Categories: