Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:58, 2 February 2007

	This user is under the microscope of the cabal. For more information, try joining some mailing lists.	Drama portal
F	This user has been rated as F-Class on the project's quality scale.

<> anyone knows how to get the "noteability" flag removed from a page?
<CharlotteWebb> , see the link that says "edit this page"
<> CharlotteWebb: thanks! that worked

War on idiocy:

1. "Notability": is not and never has been policy .
2. "Consensus": please learn to spell it before claiming one exists .
3. "Merge and delete": is not a valid result of an AFD debate .

	Archives 001 • 002 • 003 • 004 • 005 • 006 • 007 • 008 • 009

Exeter infobox

Hi, Some time ago you added a {{cleanup-infobox}} template to the Exeter article (diff). Nothing has changed in the infobox since then, and nobody has discussed it on the talk page. I can't see any problems with it at all. Can you please explain what needs fixing? Thanks. -- Sakurambo 桜ん坊 09:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

(With apologies to CharlotteWebb for butting in - ) Hi Sakurambo. I left a note here to the same effect (which has now been archived). The infobox on Exeter is a very old design which was applied without templating to political (not geographic) divisions of settlements in England. I started a thread at Template talk:Infobox England place#English cities to discuss expanding Infobox England place to accommodate the cities, but it sort of fell flat. If you're feeling brave, you can expand the template yourself (wouldn't need much tweaking, but would need to be done carefully to avoid conflicts/upset with the substantial number of other articles using the template). If it's all right with you, CharlotteWebb, I'll remove the tag on Exeter and add a comment on its talk page instead, to avoid further confusion. Thank you. — mholland 15:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Im dumb and I block people for long times at a time

None of my business, but ...

Hello CharlotteWebb, bold-non-admin-closer-of-AfDs-extraordinaire. Do you have any plans for an RfA? Any self-imposed {{shrubbery}}s to meet? You've got a heap of edits, including the near-obligatory AIV ones. I haven't wikistalked your contribs, but I'd have thought you'd be an obvious candidate. Yours in idle curiosity, Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

You think I stand a chance? After watching Ryulong 3 almost fail, I have my doubts. — CharlotteWebb 00:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Ryulong was a controversial candidate in many ways. I've never noticed you being less than civil. The things I've seen you bring up at AN* all seemed reasonable. Your experience is broader, or so it seems to me. And you're not a member of the non-existent IRC cabal, not that I've heard anyway. You do stuff in mainspace (we can never have too many redirects!). If you're thinking about it, you should get a third/fourth opinion: ask Radiant, Majorly, or JzG or someone like that what they reckon. I don't see why you wouldn't succeed. The last person I said that to was Isotope23. (But, on the other hand, I nearly said the same to FisherQueen. I was a bit disappointed with the way her RfA went. Just as well I wasn't placing bets!) No need to leap to any rash decisions. All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Hehe, I'm sure JzG really, truly loves me. — CharlotteWebb 01:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

hi if you dont have anything special to do and want to help you can either wikify the article on The graaf sisters or help on the pages on Melodifestivalen 2007./matrix17

This was a Speedy Keep, right? (Complex conjugate root theorem)

Hello CharlotteWebb. When you recently closed this AfD it was less than five days. Opened Jan. 29, closed Feb. 1. The fact that the nominator withdrew is irrelevant, according to what I've read. Would you consider marking this a Speedy Keep, to clarify matters? 00:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I HATE U

I WOULD LOVE TO DELETE THIS WEBPAGE IN EVERYWAY POSSIBLE I HATE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jonsmith667 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC).