Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Tim Bowles (5th nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:25, 25 October 2021 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 08:34, 7 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Replaced obsolete html tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
===]=== ===]===
:{{la|Tim Bowles}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Tim Bowles}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
Same as with ], no reliable third-party sources really discuss the subject himself, only his activities on behalf of an organization. The sources are all about Scientology and related litigation, not Tim Bowles as a person. ] 16:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Same as with ], no reliable third-party sources really discuss the subject himself, only his activities on behalf of an organization. The sources are all about Scientology and related litigation, not Tim Bowles as a person. ] 16:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
*'''Speedy keep''', querulous re-re-re-renomination - ] (]) 18:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC) *'''Speedy keep''', querulous re-re-re-renomination - ] (]) 18:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
*'''Speedy keep''', after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ]]] 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC) *'''Speedy keep''', after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ]]] 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:34, 7 January 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close as keep. Querrelous and pointy nomination. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

AfDs for this article:

Tim Bowles

Tim Bowles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Same as with Michelle Stith, no reliable third-party sources really discuss the subject himself, only his activities on behalf of an organization. The sources are all about Scientology and related litigation, not Tim Bowles as a person. *** Crotalus *** 16:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.