| Revision as of 12:50, 3 February 2007 editRedvers (talk | contribs)29,889 edits RfC← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:59, 3 February 2007 edit undoNetmonger (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,278 edits →RfCNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| Hope this helps. '''〈<font color="red">]</font><font color="red">]</font>〉''' 12:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | Hope this helps. '''〈<font color="red">]</font><font color="red">]</font>〉''' 12:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thanks sir, I have decided not to re-list the case, though the editor has again violated, ], ] and ]. If at all I were to re-list it, I would do it after consulting the other editors, who endorsed my statement and certified it. Thanks for your help. ]<span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:lightgreen'><sup>]</sup></span> 20:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:59, 3 February 2007
| Netmonger (I prefer to respond only on this talk page for discussions you open here; Kindly check back for replies) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
Krishanti Kumaraswamy
Additional information RaveenS 17:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nice work, if you need any help on this please let me know ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ 11:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
RfC
The content of the RfC is now in your userspace at User:Netmonger/RfC.
I don't believe in process for process sake, but I'd caution against simply reopening the existing case in case people who do believe in process accuse you of breaking that process (unless you can handle that!). I'd also caution against moving people's signature if they have signed in the wrong place (you should get them to do it themselves) and, if you ask them to move their signature, ensure you explain why so they know what they're doing and you can't be accused of "campaigning".
All of this is just advice, so please take it as such and ignore/adopt/improve as you see fit!
To relist the RfC, move it back to the old address but ensure that you or someone else tells everyone involved it has opened there.
Hope this helps. 〈REDVEЯS〉 12:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks sir, I have decided not to re-list the case, though the editor has again violated, WP:SPAM, WP:AGF and WP:STALK. If at all I were to re-list it, I would do it after consulting the other editors, who endorsed my statement and certified it. Thanks for your help. ŇëŧΜǒńğëŗ 20:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)