Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:36, 6 February 2007

I LOVE HIM ALWAYS FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!! lalalallalalalalalallalalallalalalalalalallalala you probably think i'm insane, well i'm not, everyone else is !!!!!!!!!!!Jogfdijzgozfjmligufiohfiofgiofgziofiooijfdiojfioj I LOVE HIM ALWAYS FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!

Man, when you lose it, you lose it! Happy New Year! Bishonen | talk 03:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC).

Yeah, I agree. Love u EM, lol. You are so random. Come say hi, u have my e-mail. Orane (talk • cont.) 09:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Is he for real? or did someone hack into his account:|. 58.166.220.30 03:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sure he's for real. The only question is if he'll come back if I nominate Hollaback Girl and No Doubt and all the other Gwen Stefani-related articles at WP:FAC, claiming to be the reincarnation of Eternal Equinox, will he end up coming back? ShadowHalo 07:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Haha, you almost had me thinking it was possible to leave Misplaced Pages. And just when I was about to add you to Category:Wikipedians who have gone LALALALALALALLALALALALALAL. For whatever reason, I actually knew at some point that it was the same user; I remember I saw the sheet music uploaded by EE for Cool (song) and asked Velten about it. And yet for whatever reason I was under the impression that EE had left...I think I'm just losing my mind too. Actually though, I put Hollaback Girl up at WP:FAC in case you'd like to review it. ShadowHalo 04:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

re: Play with Fire (song)

Done. It hit #31 on 12/23 and looks like it didn't get any higher. Strange that it isn't on her history page. Maybe the .com search page only does the top 20 or something? Anyhoo, it's fixed. - eo 19:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Message

You need to understand something: I am tired of associating with you, and you are now more than evidently getting in my way of editing, likely to institute blocks for a period of time for your own entertainment. As you've been told several times before, you don't own articles, so stop treating them — Nelly Furtado ones in particular — as if they are. You're not being inconspicuous and I'm particularly sick of having to go through this process because of your intolerable antics. Therefore, stop reverting good-faith edits for the sake of labelling them as "harassment" for your own blocking-humor. Velten 15:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Though I'm not sure that a complete revert was necessary, I must say I'm concerned about this edit, which states that it was at #1 on 12/15 when the reference right there states that it was at #9. ShadowHalo 04:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree with everything Velten had to say. Nothing I want to add, or take away. By far, you are one of the worst editors in th encyclopedia. As it was said, you do not own articles. Stop taking important useful encyclopedia meterial away. My problem is with your revertions in the Carrie Underwood - "Some Hearts" page. 21:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:I Am Me album cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:I Am Me album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:38, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:KaDee Strickland and Christina Ricci in Anything Else.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:KaDee Strickland and Christina Ricci in Anything Else.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Reply or Electic Storm

Thats a whole list you've writen :P

1. First about I'm Not Dead. I believe people are interrested in a good structure were they can read what they wanne read. If they want album information (and I believe that, that kind of information is about the songs and the history of its writing) the can go directly to that paragraph and the same for its reception. Some of them are just interrested in the numbers and charts and not about the album. To read such a long piece of text is I think "onhandy". And you point to the official wikipedia explaination, but I just don't agree. What do you say?
2. Recources: Alot of people use http://pulsemusic.proboards48.com/ also as a reliable source in wikipedia pages. Because wikipedia isn't removing them I believe a same kind of site (uk message board) can then be used also. But I get you're point and I will, in the future, do it differently.
3. Not Too Late/Thinking About You: I see were you're going and I understand it. Hadn't thought about it.
4. References: mmm....I really don't get your piont. But if you want it that way, whatever. Alot of other wikipedia pages do it same as I did it. User:Electric Storm (Electric Storm89 13:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC))

Mariah Carey FAR

Mariah Carey has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)