| Revision as of 21:28, 22 November 2021 editKewlgrapes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers734 edits →2021 Waukesha Christmas parade incident: clarifyTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:33, 22 November 2021 edit undoEvergreenFir (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators129,323 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision on 2021 Waukesha Christmas parade incident.Tags: Twinkle RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| I your change to this page. The article space is not the appropriate place to discuss renaming the article. There is currently online discussion on renaming this article. Feel free to share your opinion in ] on the article's talk page. --] (] • ]) 21:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC) | I your change to this page. The article space is not the appropriate place to discuss renaming the article. There is currently online discussion on renaming this article. Feel free to share your opinion in ] on the article's talk page. --] (] • ]) 21:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == November 2021 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] and for repeated violations of BLP on the page ], you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] (specifically ]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the ] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. </p>] ] 22:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC) <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following ] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
Revision as of 22:33, 22 November 2021
Test
June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Talk:Tom Brady. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ——Serial 12:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Modern NFL Historian, please note that per the GA nomination instructions,
Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article on the article talk page prior to a nomination.
You have not made any contributions to the article nor consulted with significant contributors to it, which is why your nominations have been reverted. - If you believe the Tom Brady article meets the GA criteria and is ready for nomination, you need first to do the consultation by posting a request to Talk:Tom Brady and allowing seven days for responses to accumulate. If there is then a consensus that the article is ready, and if you are prepared to work on edits to the article during the GA review process, you can make a nomination once the consultation process is over. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
clpo13(talk) 20:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
November 2021
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Misplaced Pages about living (or recently deceased) persons. This applies to 'all pages on Misplaced Pages. Please also review WP:NOR EvergreenFir (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
2021 Waukesha Christmas parade incident
I reverted your change to this page. The article space is not the appropriate place to discuss renaming the article. There is currently online discussion on renaming this article. Feel free to share your opinion in this discussion on the article's talk page. --kewlgrapes (talk • contribs) 21:26, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
November 2021
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."