| Revision as of 10:51, 11 December 2021 editSpiderone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers190,159 edits →Eder Sarabia: keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:51, 11 December 2021 edit undoSpiderone (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers190,159 editsm →Eder SarabiaNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| *'''Keep''': Not sure if I'm seeing an edited/newer version of the page for the subject, but easily passes ]. ] (]) 21:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': Not sure if I'm seeing an edited/newer version of the page for the subject, but easily passes ]. ] (]) 21:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', passes GNG.--] (]) 13:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', passes GNG.--] (]) 13:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - the article does |
*'''Keep''' - the article does its best to get as much out of the coverage available, nevertheless there is enough there to count as multiple sources showing more than trivial coverage ]<sup>]</sup> 10:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:51, 11 December 2021
Eder Sarabia
AfDs for this article:New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Eder Sarabia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, never played or managed in a WP:FPL. Barely passed a previous AFD due to multiple sockpuppet voters (since blocked). Fred Zepelin (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Fred Zepelin (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 21:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - probably passes GNG due to sources included since last AFD. GiantSnowman 22:21, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: If the first nomination (which had a very poor storyline and far less sources) was closed on keep, I don't see any reason to make this one a delete. BRDude (talk) 01:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - seems well sourced --dashiellx (talk) 13:35, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Somewhat weak as the sources seem WP:ROUTINE I feel there is enough there to warrant an article. Govvy (talk) 15:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Well sourced and meets GNG ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 15:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Passes GNG due to avialbility of good sources. Juggyevil (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: Not sure if I'm seeing an edited/newer version of the page for the subject, but easily passes WP:SIGCOV. GauchoDude (talk) 21:22, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, passes GNG.--Mvqr (talk) 13:17, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - the article does its best to get as much out of the coverage available, nevertheless there is enough there to count as multiple sources showing more than trivial coverage Spiderone 10:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)