Misplaced Pages

Four-dimensionalism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:37, 8 February 2007 edit129.11.76.216 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 01:34, 15 February 2007 edit undoZeke-xL (talk | contribs)15 editsm spellingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
In the ], '''four dimensionalism''' is someimtes used to refer to the view that reality is a four-dimensional continuum composed of time and space (]). The principal argument for four dimensionalism is the ]. In the ], '''four dimensionalism''' is sometimes used to refer to the view that reality is a four-dimensional continuum composed of time and space (]). The principal argument for four dimensionalism is the ].


Sometimes the term is instead used to refer to the view that objects persist by having temoral parts. This is the view that, for all regions of time in which a persisting object is located, that object has a temporal part that is exactly located at that region of time. This is in contrast to endurentism (sometimes called "three dimensionalism"), which says that objects are wholly located at each time at which they exist. Sometimes the term is instead used to refer to the view that objects persist by having temoral parts. This is the view that, for all regions of time in which a persisting object is located, that object has a temporal part that is exactly located at that region of time. This is in contrast to endurentism (sometimes called "three dimensionalism"), which says that objects are wholly located at each time at which they exist.

Revision as of 01:34, 15 February 2007

In the philosophy of time, four dimensionalism is sometimes used to refer to the view that reality is a four-dimensional continuum composed of time and space (spacetime). The principal argument for four dimensionalism is the Rietdijk-Putnam argument.

Sometimes the term is instead used to refer to the view that objects persist by having temoral parts. This is the view that, for all regions of time in which a persisting object is located, that object has a temporal part that is exactly located at that region of time. This is in contrast to endurentism (sometimes called "three dimensionalism"), which says that objects are wholly located at each time at which they exist.

References

Stub icon

This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: