Revision as of 12:45, 17 January 2022 editPrimeBOT (talk | contribs)Bots2,048,605 editsm →top: Task 24: template substitution following a TFDTag: AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:53, 18 January 2022 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Watercolor painting/Archive 1) (botNext edit → | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
I changed the intro from technique to method. Simple terms better. ] | I changed the intro from technique to method. Simple terms better. ] | ||
== Sources and external links == | |||
{{discussion top}} | |||
Are these sites/sources/external links good? | |||
*http://watercolor.net/history-overview/ | |||
*https://www.boundless.com/art-history/textbooks/boundless-art-history-textbook/south-and-southeast-asia-after-1200-ce-28/india-under-british-imperialism-179/indian-painting-under-british-imperialism-972-17378/ | |||
*<del>http://www.betsyporter.com/Ethiopia.html</del> | |||
*http://watercolormisfit.com/category/30-watercolor-tips/ | |||
*http://www.handprint.com/HP/WCL/water.html | |||
*http://watercolorpainting.com | |||
*http://www.chinese5art.com/info/2/watercolor_painting_technique_in_the_East.html | |||
*http://www.paintingwithwatercolors.com/ | |||
-- ] (]) 09:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
:I don't see that any should be added. Where disd this odd mixture come from? ] (]) 11:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
::Off the top of my head, I think it came from some old editor's sources which may or may not have been a COI, and some stuff I found on a Google search. ] (]) 01:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
::Update: These sources aren't needed. I think this discussion can close. ] (]) 03:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
{{discussion bottom}} | |||
== Opening section is muddled == | == Opening section is muddled == |
Revision as of 03:53, 18 January 2022
Visual arts C‑class | |||||||
|
Archives | |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Qchen018.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
Any particular reason why the link to handprint.com was removed? It's a non-commercial comprehensive description of watercolour materials and techniques. I've added it again: if there's a good reason to remove it please do. Anon2
Too many spam external links. Relevant links needed. -anon April 06
Change in intro
I changed the intro from technique to method. Simple terms better. Smilegood
Opening section is muddled
As a (very) experienced artist and one-time owner of an art supply store, I find the opening section of the article muddled (pun intended). It seems to present "aquarelle" as a synonym for "watercolor painting", with (in a subsequent paragraph) the addition of Chinese White, to achieve more opacity, as a subset of watercolor/aquarelle.
Actually, "aquarelle" specifically denotes transparent or translucent watercolor. The opaque variety, which may be achieved by adding Chinese White or by other methods, is called (in its professional version) "gouache"; in its amateur/cheap version, "poster paint"; and when used incorrectly as a pretentious synonym for poster paint, "tempera". (Actually tempera is something else entirely.)
In other words, aquarelle and gouache are sub-categories of watercolor paint, both in terms of materials and techniques. None of this is made clear in the article as I see it now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.100.8 (talk) 19:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Categories: